: RE: Thoughtless fixes considered harmful Was: [OT]
Automated
fixes considered harmful
On 21/10/06, Fedotov, Alexei A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex,
I see and accept your point. I believe that partial commits are a
must -
we should be a community.
My point is simple - the code under active
-Original Message-
From: Alex Blewitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 3:32 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: RE: Thoughtless fixes considered harmful Was: [OT]
Automated
fixes considered harmful
On 21/10/06, Fedotov, Alexei A [EMAIL PROTECTED
Alex,
This is a great letter! I cannot compete. I agree with the main point
that no change should be done until the proper understanding of
consequences is achieved.
Nevertheless, from my perspective automatic tools are pretty good for
locating problematic places, and each place usually worth
.
With best regards,
Alexei Fedotov,
Intel Java XML Engineering
-Original Message-
From: Alex Blewitt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2006 3:06 AM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Thoughtless fixes considered harmful Was: [OT] Automated
fixes
considered
On 21/10/06, Fedotov, Alexei A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alex,
I see and accept your point. I believe that partial commits are a must -
we should be a community.
My point is simple - the code under active development shouldn't be a
subject of beautification - it just should be safe for other
