Hello John,
(i'm moving thread to the ghc-users where this discussion continues in
ghc-related aspects)
Thursday, September 28, 2006, 3:30:09 AM, you wrote:
So, just to confirm in my mind what you are proposing:
Compiler/Version specific Core:
Yhc.Core, Hugs.Core, GHC.Core
With a
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 06:06:02PM +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
(i'm moving thread to the ghc-users where this discussion continues in
ghc-related aspects)
I don't see how compiler-independence is a GHC-specific topic.
___
Glasgow-haskell-users
Hello Ross,
Tuesday, October 3, 2006, 10:33:46 PM, you wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 06:06:02PM +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
(i'm moving thread to the ghc-users where this discussion continues in
ghc-related aspects)
I don't see how compiler-independence is a GHC-specific topic.
i mean
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 05:20:36PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
As it happens I was working on getting GHC to use cabal to build base
et al on the plane the other day, and I had a brief look at this.
See my comment in
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/710
for the results of my longer
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 05:12:34PM +0100, Neil Mitchell wrote:
So, just to confirm in my mind what you are proposing:
Compiler/Version specific Core:
Yhc.Core, Hugs.Core, GHC.Core
With a different version for each compiler version. Tied intimately to
the compiler.
A large issue
(more details about problem i try to solve and plan to do it)
during development of Haskell compilers, it was discovered that their
libraries has so much in common. as a result, common library for Haskell
compilers was born that hides differences between them and provides common API.
Hi Bulat,
Just a partial answer for now:
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 12:29:58PM +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Friday, September 8, 2006, 5:52:57 AM, you wrote:
what is a 'base' library now? it is the library that implements common set
of operations for latest versions of ghc, hugs and nhc.
[Moving to cafe for follow up discussions]
Hi Bulat,
So, just to confirm in my mind what you are proposing:
Compiler/Version specific Core:
Yhc.Core, Hugs.Core, GHC.Core
With a different version for each compiler version. Tied intimately to
the compiler.
The leveler:
Core - which
Hello Neil,
Friday, September 15, 2006, 8:12:34 PM, you wrote:
[Moving to cafe for follow up discussions]
i should be started this discussion in libraries... :(
Yhc.Core, Hugs.Core, GHC.Core
With a different version for each compiler version. Tied intimately to
the compiler.
The
