On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 12:50:48AM +0200, Daniel Fischer wrote:
On Friday 21 October 2011, 23:49:45, Magnus Therning wrote:
Would love to get some help on making Haddock accept ConfigFile[1]. The
error message is about as far from helpful as you can get ;)
On 20 October 2011 22:16, thomas burt thedwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps I will try and force `stuffToDo` not to leave any partially
evaluated thunks behind and compare the cost then.
What happens when you switch to a strict StateT?
Bas
___
Recently I was looking for an A-star search algorithm. I've found a package
but I couldn't understand the code. Then I saw some blogposts but they
were difficult to understand too. I thought about some easier solution that
relies on laziness. And I've come to this:
Heuristic search is like
That's a great idea!
On Oct 21, 2011, at 5:34 PM, Vincent Hanquez wrote:
On 10/20/2011 08:27 PM, Bas van Dijk wrote:
Hello,
I've a small patch[1] that updates the rss package to the latest
versions of its dependencies. (I'm trying to get the new
hackage-server to build on ghc-7.2.1)
I released a new rss:
http://hackage.haskell.org//package/rss-3000.2.0
It no longer requires old-time and is tested with the latest versions
of its dependencies.
On 21 October 2011 17:34, Vincent Hanquez t...@snarc.org wrote:
Perhaps, unless someone step up, it would be nice to move packages
How do you mean effective?
While I am not sure they mention A* search, you might like to look at
the paper
Modular Lazy Search for Constraint Satisfaction Problems by Nordin
Tolmach.
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.34.4704
RS
On 22/10/11 13:28, Anton Kholomiov
Sorry for my English.
I mean can be used in practice, no only for toy examples
2011/10/22 Richard Senington sc06...@leeds.ac.uk
**
How do you mean effective?
While I am not sure they mention A* search, you might like to look at the
paper
Modular Lazy Search for Constraint Satisfaction
I've just been updating my code to take advantage of the test support in Cabal.
I have it so that
cabal configure --enable-tests
cabal build
cabal test
works. However, when I try to upload to hackage, I get
cabal upload -c dist/swish-0.6.2.0.tar.gz
Checking
The world needs programmers to accept and take seriously Greg
Wilson's extensible programming, and stop laughing it off as lolwut
wysiwyg msword for programming, and start implementing it.
http://third-bit.com/blog/archives/4302.html
Who is the world? For starters, I don't think it is Greg
Maybe the issue is that the test modules are missing from the
distribution file, which is a known bug.
(http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/792)
JP
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Doug Burke doug_j_bu...@yahoo.com wrote:
I've just been updating my code to take advantage of the test
Aha, I'd missed that; thanks - I'll try the fix after going pumpkin hunting
with the kids!
Doug
From: JP Moresmau jpmores...@gmail.com
To: Doug Burke doug_j_bu...@yahoo.com
Cc: Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2011
Yeah, I was going to mention Smalltalk too, as one of the languages NOT using
plain text to store programs — which led to a very strong boundary between ST
and other world, not doing any favors to the first.
The idea of using some non-plaintext-based format to store programs appeared
lots of
Sorry, thought I had replied to this with my result!
I added `seq` and $! inside `stuffToDo` to ensure that there weren't any
thunks left around after it was called.
The measured times were only a few hundredths of a second apart after that.
So, apparently even with a strict StateT, partially
On Saturday 22 October 2011, 23:07:44, thomas burt wrote:
Sorry, thought I had replied to this with my result!
I added `seq` and $! inside `stuffToDo` to ensure that there weren't any
thunks left around after it was called.
The measured times were only a few hundredths of a second apart
Actually, it seems to be more related
to http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/811 since if I remove the
conditional elements within the test stanzas it looks like hackage is happy
again.
Doug
From: Doug Burke doug_j_bu...@yahoo.com
To: JP Moresmau
The title might be a bit more provocative than necessary.
I'm starting to suspect that there are very useful aspects of the
parametricity of System F(C) which can't be taken advantage of by
Haskell in its current state. To put it briefly, case-matching on a
value of type (forall n . T n)
16 matches
Mail list logo
