Richard O'Keefe o...@cs.otago.ac.nz wrote:
I thought X is a mirror of Y meant X would be a read-only replica of Y,
with some sort of protocol between X and Y to keep X up to date.
As long as the material from Y replicated at X is *supposed* to be
publicly available, I don't see a security
Ozgur Akgun ozgurak...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a very generous offer. However, I must say I like the following idea
more:
http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/efw38/
reminder_hackagehaskellorg_outage_tomorrow_due_to/c17u7nk
I'd support this, but I'm strongly in favor of the use of
Edward Z. Yang ezy...@mit.edu wrote:
There are many setuid binaries to non-root users, so getuid() != geteuid()
would probably make more sense, though I'm not 100% it has all the correct
security properties.
Might as well throw in getegid() != getgid() for good measure.
Another issue with
wren ng thornton w...@freegeek.org wrote:
Semantic Parse Fail: did you mean the latter or strongly opposed to?
s/former/latter/
:)
-=rsw
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
