-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/8/10 12:57 , Andrew Coppin wrote:
inherited a knackered L-gulonolactone oxidase enzyme.
L-gluconolactone oxidase maybe?
(pedants-R-us...)
- --
brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] allb...@kf8nh.com
system administrator
Andrew Coppin andrewcop...@btinternet.com writes:
A change to a gene does not make you to have a extra bone. It can
make you to have your hand slighltly longer. or shorter.
Actually I suspect it does - or at least can do. It's just a rather
rare event.
Bodily development is regulated by a
Mitar mmi...@gmail.com writes:
Neither Haskell nor any conventional language has [evolved to evolve]
True.
Well - thinking about it, there's no fundamental difference between
genetic algorithms - where you have a genome in the form of a set of
parameters and genetic programming - where the
Hi Ketil,
2010/12/9 Ketil Malde ke...@malde.org
Mitar mmi...@gmail.com writes:
Neither Haskell nor any conventional language has [evolved to evolve]
True.
Well - thinking about it, there's no fundamental difference between
genetic algorithms - where you have a genome in the form of a
Hi!
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
assign rates of mutation for each statement,
This could be assigned by evolution itself. If if will have high
probability of mutation then resulting programs will not survive. So
those probabilities can be assigned
Hi!
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
wrote:
assign rates of mutation for each statement,
This could be assigned by evolution itself. If if will have high
probability of mutation then resulting programs will not survive. So
those probabilities can be
Off topic
I was deeply involved in genetic programming in the past (in fact I
discovered Haskell on looking for a functional language for genetic
programing with better syntax than LISP).
But I soon realized that GP was not the holy grial after all. The problem
with evolving arbitrary
Hi!
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
But programs are non lineal.
And DNK is? I doubt. ;-)
I think the approach is valid, it simulates what is happening in
nature (random insertions, deletions, changes, translations, copies,
etc, without any higher
DNK? I think you mean DNA.
the genotype program that develips the fenotype is much more smooth and
granular than a computer program. A chante un a gen does not make you to
have a extra bone. It can make you to have your hand slighltly longer. or
shorter.
In fact there are metalevels of
Hi ;)
2010/12/8 Mitar mmi...@gmail.com
Hi!
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
wrote:
DNK? I think you mean DNA.
Sorry. In my native language it is DNK. ;-)
the genotype program that develips the fenotype is much more smooth and
granular than a
Hi!
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course there are smooth zones in the fitness landscape of any code. what
is necessary is to direct the process by avoiding absurd replacements
(mutations that goes straight to dead zones) and rules for changing
On 08/12/2010 02:40 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
A change to a gene does not make you to have a extra bone. It can make
you to have your hand slighltly longer. or shorter.
Actually I suspect it does - or at least can do. It's just a rather rare
event.
In fact there are metalevels of
12 matches
Mail list logo
