On 11/25/11 9:10 AM, Twan van Laarhoven wrote:
IMO, a book author should expect that an URL like
http://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/ could change to point to a new
version, since it doesn't mention a version number or date anywhere.
The most sensible directory structure would be:
On 23/11/11 23:02, Tom Murphy wrote:
Is there a reason that the Haskell 2010 report is in a subdirectory of
haskell.org/onlinereport http://haskell.org/onlinereport (which
currently points to the Haskell98 standard)?
http://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/ -- Haskell98
Is there a reason that the Haskell 2010 report is in a subdirectory of
haskell.org/onlinereport (which currently points to the Haskell98 standard)?
http://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/ -- Haskell98
http://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/haskell2010/ -- Haskell2010
If it's for historical
On 23 November 2011 22:02, Tom Murphy amin...@gmail.com wrote:
The current impression that we give is that Haskell98 is the current
standard, and Haskell2010 isn't compiler-supported.
Indeed, but yesterday there was a post on beginners where the OP said they
didn't want to use extensions,
