Am Mittwoch, 18. März 2009 13:31 schrieben Sie:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 04:36, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 18. März 2009 10:03 schrieb Benjamin L.Russell:
Just go through the list, choose your top favorite, and assign rank 1
to it;
Is rank 1 the best or the worst?
The
Am Donnerstag, 19. März 2009 03:53 schrieb Benjamin L.Russell:
Therefore, rank 1 is the best.
This is quite the opposite of what Denis Bueno said. :-(
Best wishes,
Wolfgang
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
Wolfgang == Wolfgang Jeltsch g9ks1...@acme.softbase.org writes:
Wolfgang Am Mittwoch, 18. März 2009 13:31 schrieben Sie:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 04:36, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 18. März 2009 10:03 schrieb Benjamin L.Russell:
Just go through the list, choose your
On 19 mrt 2009, at 11:39, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 18. März 2009 13:31 schrieben Sie:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 04:36, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 18. März 2009 10:03 schrieb Benjamin L.Russell:
Just go through the list, choose your top favorite, and assign
rank 1
to it;
On 19 Mar 2009, at 11:39, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 18. März 2009 13:31 schrieben Sie:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 04:36, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 18. März 2009 10:03 schrieb Benjamin L.Russell:
Just go through the list, choose your top favorite, and assign
rank 1
to
37Lenny222
Just noticed that this logo is way too similar to the logo of Techsmith:
http://www.techsmith.com/
Regards,
CS
2009/3/19 Eelco Lempsink ee...@lempsink.nl
On 19 mrt 2009, at 11:39, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 18. März 2009 13:31 schrieben Sie:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at
IANAL, so would this a problem if this logo won?
Deniz
2009/3/19 Cetin Sert cetin.s...@gmail.com:
37Lenny222
Just noticed that this logo is way too similar to the logo of Techsmith:
http://www.techsmith.com/
Regards,
CS
2009/3/19 Eelco Lempsink ee...@lempsink.nl
On 19 mrt 2009, at
On 2009 Mar 19, at 13:12, Deniz Dogan wrote:
IANAL, so would this a problem if this logo won?
Legally, only if Techsmith complained. Practically, I would wonder
about the possibility of confusion.
--
brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] allb...@kf8nh.com
system
Deniz Dogan wrote:
IANAL, so would this a problem if this logo won?
Not necessarily. The Lenny222 entry is distinctly multicoloured
unlike TechSmith's which might distinguish it. Trademarks may only
apply to a particular industrial sector or geographical region.
TechSmith is in computer
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 04:42, Wolfgang Jeltsch
g9ks1...@acme.softbase.org wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 19. März 2009 03:53 schrieb Benjamin L.Russell:
Therefore, rank 1 is the best.
This is quite the opposite of what Denis Bueno said. :-(
Ugh, I'm sorry about this. I've participated in several
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:24:28 +0100, Heinrich Apfelmus
apfel...@quantentunnel.de wrote:
[...]
Thanks for organizing this, finally I can choose ... Oh my god! How am I
supposed to make a vote?
Actually, I found the voting process to be fairly straightforward and
trivial.
Just go through the
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:58:12 +0100, Karel Gardas
karel.gar...@centrum.cz wrote:
Sorry for newcomer silly question, but where is the voting page located?
Each voter is assigned a private URL encoding a key for voting. You
should have receive a vote in a message entitled CIVS Poll now
available
Am Dienstag, 17. März 2009 16:55 schrieb Eelco Lempsink:
We'll see. Worst case: nobody votes (with 123 votes at this moment, I
don't think that will be the problem). Second worst case: most people
don't have/take the time to order a bit, so it turns into a majority
vote.
Or there are many
Am Mittwoch, 18. März 2009 10:03 schrieb Benjamin L.Russell:
Just go through the list, choose your top favorite, and assign rank 1
to it;
Is rank 1 the best or the worst?
I thought it would be the worst so I would probably have voted exactly the
opposite way than I wanted to. :-(
Best
Am Dienstag, 17. März 2009 21:08 schrieb Robin Green:
However, I am now hacking together a quick-and-dirty utility for
ranking things which I will put on hackage. I'm not sure that anyone
other than myself will use it, but it's fun hacking it up.
If you announce it on the mailing list, I might
Am Mittwoch, 18. März 2009 03:22 schrieb Robin Green:
I'm afraid it is entirely terminal-based (i.e. text only), so it doesn't
show the pictures.
Hmm, this doesn’t help me since I’ve already written a terminal-based app. See
attachement. However, no guarantees that this app works as intended.
Firstly, apologies to everyone for sending the same message to the list
five times, yesterday! The mailserver I use kept timing out, and I had
thought that my mail client would handle attempts to resend an email
appropriately, but apparently not. Time to put a paper bag over my head!
On Wed, 18
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 11:36:15 +0100, Wolfgang Jeltsch
g9ks1...@acme.softbase.org wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 18. Marz 2009 10:03 schrieb Benjamin L.Russell:
Just go through the list, choose your top favorite, and assign rank 1
to it;
Is rank 1 the best or the worst?
On your voting page referenced in a
Eelco Lempsink wrote:
Hi there!
I updated a couple of logo versions and ungrouped and regrouped the
(former) number 31. Other than that, there was nothing standing in the
way of the voting to begin imho, so I started up the competition.
By now, I suppose everybody should have received
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 15:24:28 +0100
Heinrich Apfelmus apfel...@quantentunnel.de wrote:
A simple majority vote is clearly inadequate for this vote, but I'm
afraid that without assisting technology (instant and visual
feedback), the voting process will more or less deteriorate to that
due to the
On 17 Mar 2009, at 15:24, Heinrich Apfelmus wrote:
Eelco Lempsink wrote:
Hi there!
I updated a couple of logo versions and ungrouped and regrouped the
(former) number 31. Other than that, there was nothing standing in
the
way of the voting to begin imho, so I started up the competition.
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:11:54 +0100
Thomas Davie tom.da...@gmail.com wrote:
I have to agree that the UI for voting is not the best I've ever
seen. On the other hand, it's pretty easy to select the few logos
that you like, and push them all to the top, select the ones you'd
accept, and
I am also concerned that the default behaviour of the buttons will
lead to arbitrary preference rankings favouring those with entries
that start more towards the top or bottom of the list. You shouldn't
have to go to a lot of extra effort to create a tie between several
entries, if you can't
And we thought butterfly ballots were bad.
I just went through the logo page and wrote down my favorite 20 logos in one
column, and gave them a rank in the other. Then translated that into the
voting list using the combo boxes (not the buttons). The total process took
20 minutes.
I am on FF3 on
On 17 mrt 2009, at 15:24, Heinrich Apfelmus wrote:
Eelco Lempsink wrote:
I updated a couple of logo versions and ungrouped and regrouped the
(former) number 31. Other than that, there was nothing standing in
the
way of the voting to begin imho, so I started up the competition.
Thanks for
On 17 mrt 2009, at 16:33, Rick R wrote:
I just went through the logo page and wrote down my favorite 20
logos in one column, and gave them a rank in the other. Then
translated that into the voting list using the combo boxes (not the
buttons). The total process took 20 minutes.
Yeah, the
Hi,
Even worse, the buttons for moving items up and down are buggy - at
least on my browser (Firefox 3.1 beta 2 on Linux). They sometimes
reorder my other votes! Even assuming that the list box code is not
buggy (which I now doubt), not being able to use the buttons makes this
form almost
(correction of the example)
(105: ) (106: A) (107: X,B) (108: C,D) (109: E ) (110: )
moving down X will result in either
(105: A) (106: B) (107: X ) (108: C,D) (109: E ) (110: )
or equivalently
(105: ) (106: A) (107: B ) (108: X ) (109: C,D) (110: E)
QED
2009/3/17 Daniel Schüssler anotheraddr...@gmx.de
(correction of the example)
(105: ) (106: A) (107: X,B) (108: C,D) (109: E ) (110: )
moving down X will result in either
(105: A) (106: B) (107: X ) (108: C,D) (109: E ) (110: )
or equivalently
(105: ) (106: A) (107: B )
On Tuesday 17 March 2009 21:03:21 Rick R wrote:
QED
Hmm? Maybe if confusingness was to be demonstrated, but not bugginess. Both
possibilities will result in the same total preordering (defined by (x
`betterThanOrEq` y) iff (numberInCombobox x = numberInCombobox y)), and
(AFAIK) only this
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 04:03:21PM -0400, Rick R wrote:
QED
Only relative ordering matters for condorcet, not the absolute rank.
e.g., ranking A, B and C rank 1, and
D, E and F rank 6
is exactly the same as ranking
e.g., ranking A, B and C rank 2, and
D, E and F rank
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:34:12 +0100
Daniel Schüssler anotheraddr...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
Even worse, the buttons for moving items up and down are buggy - at
least on my browser (Firefox 3.1 beta 2 on Linux). They sometimes
reorder my other votes! Even assuming that the list box code is not
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:34:12 +0100
Daniel Schüssler anotheraddr...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
Even worse, the buttons for moving items up and down are buggy - at
least on my browser (Firefox 3.1 beta 2 on Linux). They sometimes
reorder my other votes! Even assuming that the list box code is not
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:34:12 +0100
Daniel Schüssler anotheraddr...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
Even worse, the buttons for moving items up and down are buggy - at
least on my browser (Firefox 3.1 beta 2 on Linux). They sometimes
reorder my other votes! Even assuming that the list box code is not
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:34:12 +0100
Daniel Schüssler anotheraddr...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
Even worse, the buttons for moving items up and down are buggy - at
least on my browser (Firefox 3.1 beta 2 on Linux). They sometimes
reorder my other votes! Even assuming that the list box code is not
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Heinrich Apfelmus
apfel...@quantentunnel.de wrote:
Eelco Lempsink wrote:
Hi there!
I updated a couple of logo versions and ungrouped and regrouped the
(former) number 31. Other than that, there was nothing standing in the
way of the voting to begin
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:34:12 +0100
Daniel Schüssler anotheraddr...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
Even worse, the buttons for moving items up and down are buggy - at
least on my browser (Firefox 3.1 beta 2 on Linux). They sometimes
reorder my other votes! Even assuming that the list box code is not
The main problems I had with the voting system were
(1) In order to choose a rank, I had to scroll *up* over
100+ unwanted ranks. If only the scrolling started
at the *top* -- for the simple reason that few people
will want to rank all 113 choices, so almost all of
the ranks
There are larger versions of most of them here:
http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Haskell_logos/New_logo_ideas
30 should probably have been split up by typeface.
My votes: 68, 58, 59, 30, 6, 61, 3, 37, 34, 36, rest.
I had trouble choosing between my top four.
Note that votes cannot be
39 matches
Mail list logo
