Hello all,
I was asked to give a one-hour 'introductory' seminar on Haskell. The
audience is a bunch of very clever people with a wider than usual
perspective on programming and mathematics, and my talk should be rather
informational than evangelistic. Which topics do you think I should
touch by
On 14 Jul 2009, at 15:30, Patai Gergely wrote:
Hello all,
I was asked to give a one-hour 'introductory' seminar on Haskell. The
audience is a bunch of very clever people with a wider than usual
perspective on programming and mathematics, and my talk should be
rather
informational than
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 2:42 PM, Thomas Davietom.da...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 Jul 2009, at 15:30, Patai Gergely wrote:
Hello all,
I was asked to give a one-hour 'introductory' seminar on Haskell. The
audience is a bunch of very clever people with a wider than usual
perspective on
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:42 PM, Thomas Davietom.da...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 Jul 2009, at 15:30, Patai Gergely wrote:
Hello all,
I was asked to give a one-hour 'introductory' seminar on Haskell. The
audience is a bunch of very clever people with a wider than usual
perspective on
2009/7/14 Patai Gergely patai_gerg...@fastmail.fm:
Hello all,
I was asked to give a one-hour 'introductory' seminar on Haskell. The
audience is a bunch of very clever people with a wider than usual
perspective on programming and mathematics, and my talk should be rather
informational than
http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Tying_the_Knot would seem to be relevant.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Cristiano Paris fr...@theshire.org wrote:
I would like to know them.
I'm looking for small snippets of code that are elegant when written
in Haskell (which is lazy by default) but
Domain theory semantics, I guess.
I know, that if I (or rather a younger copy of me, not knowing a thing
about Haskell) would be one of your students, and you tell me that there
is such a clean and nice semantics for what we are doing, I'd be excited.
Patai Gergely wrote:
Hello all,
I was
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Cristiano Parisfr...@theshire.org wrote:
2009/7/14 Patai Gergely patai_gerg...@fastmail.fm:
Hello all,
I was asked to give a one-hour 'introductory' seminar on Haskell. The
audience is a bunch of very clever people with a wider than usual
perspective on
Hello Cristiano,
Tuesday, July 14, 2009, 6:01:14 PM, you wrote:
When you create the presentation, please consider the big picture of
Haskell, not only its technological features like laziness,
curryfication, HOF, monadic syntax, type inference, type classes and
so on.
I would concentrate
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Bulat
Ziganshinbulat.zigans...@gmail.com wrote:
...
the question is how to justify this in 1 hour. technical people don't
buy such arguments with justification. but if it will be done, it
would be best presentation possible
I think it's important to elaborate
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Cristiano Parisfr...@theshire.org wrote:
...
Why don't we create a specific Wiki page about Haskell advocation,
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Advocation
Cristiano
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Any chance of renaming it to Advocacy?
On Jul 14, 2009, at 11:42 PM, Cristiano Paris wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Cristiano Parisfr...@theshire.org
wrote:
...
Why don't we create a specific Wiki page about Haskell advocation,
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Advocation
Cristiano
patai_gergely:
Hello all,
I was asked to give a one-hour 'introductory' seminar on Haskell. The
audience is a bunch of very clever people with a wider than usual
perspective on programming and mathematics, and my talk should be rather
informational than evangelistic. Which topics do you
I would concentrate on the fact that when you use Haskell, you write
code that is less prone to errors and bugs. When you write a program
in Haskell and it finally compiles, chances are that there are far
less bugs than in a program written in another language
the question is how to
Dear Gergely,
Okasaki's Purely Functional Data Structures is a treasure trove of
interesting things to demonstrate Haskell on. Especially the data
structures based on numerical representations (skew binary numbers and
so on) appealed to my mathematical side.
Matthias.
patai_gergely:
I would concentrate on the fact that when you use Haskell, you write
code that is less prone to errors and bugs. When you write a program
in Haskell and it finally compiles, chances are that there are far
less bugs than in a program written in another language
the
16 matches
Mail list logo
