Most existing Haskell books and similar teaching material is aimed at
programmers who are new to Haskell. This survey is to assess the community
interest in teaching material covering advanced topics beyond the commonly
taught introductory material.
Something to consider is that it's not so much whether the material is
basic, advanced, or intermediate; it's that the way it's being presented is
boring and ineffective.
Take the Head First Java book, which was deliberately engineered to
overcome precisely this hitherto neglected aspect of
On 4 October 2012 18:04, Kim-Ee Yeoh k...@atamo.com wrote:
Something to consider is that it's not so much whether the material is
basic, advanced, or intermediate; it's that the way it's being presented is
boring and ineffective.
I'd suggest there is enough range in the Haskell books now
2012/10/4 Stephen Tetley stephen.tet...@gmail.com:
On 4 October 2012 18:04, Kim-Ee Yeoh k...@atamo.com wrote:
Something to consider is that it's not so much whether the material is
basic, advanced, or intermediate; it's that the way it's being presented is
boring and ineffective.
I'd suggest
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Stephen Tetley stephen.tet...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 October 2012 18:04, Kim-Ee Yeoh k...@atamo.com wrote:
Something to consider is that it's not so much whether the material is
basic, advanced, or intermediate; it's that the way it's being presented is
boring
Kristopher Micinski krismicin...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Stephen Tetley stephen.tet...@gmail.com
wrote:
As for an advanced book, maybe limiting the subject to one domain
(concurrency / DSLs for graphics / pick a favourite ...) might
make a better book than one targeting a
