Am Montag, 18. Februar 2008 04:37 schrieb Tom Davies:
Are there generally accepted English language names for the arrow
combinators?
compose?
pair?
etc...
I call “sequence”.
Best wishes,
Wolfgang
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Am Montag, 18. Februar 2008 19:46 schrieb Carlos Gomez A.:
hi, my name is carlos
I need information for correct installor
what are dependencies on ghc ?
I have a Debian System.
Always use your distribution’s packages until they aren’t any or there is good
reason not to do so. Try
Am Sonntag, 17. Februar 2008 14:41 schrieb Neil Mitchell:
Hi
2) You would hope there is a quick way to search those symbols. But
most search engines do not treate symbols friendly, often just ignore
them. I typed ~ in Hoogle, it also returned nothing.
3) If the module defining the symbol
On Mon, 2008-02-18 at 20:05 -0600, Antoine Latter wrote:
Can I specify an equality constraint in the build-depends field of a
.cabal file? This would say that I want one specific version (because
all the rest of my packages are compiled against that version and I'm
getting type-checking
Am Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 03:05 schrieb Antoine Latter:
Can I specify an equality constraint in the build-depends field of a
.cabal file? This would say that I want one specific version (because
all the rest of my packages are compiled against that version and I'm
getting type-checking
Philip Armstrong wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 05:56:41PM +, Adrian Hey wrote:
Philip Armstrong wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 10:01:14PM +, Adrian Hey wrote:
BTW, I find this especially ironic as fromDistinctAscList is the
perfect
example what I was talking about in another thread
Am Sonntag, 17. Februar 2008 10:12 schrieb Colin Paul Adams:
The mnemonics is that Right x is right in the sense of
correct. So, the error case has to be Left err .
As I said, this is sinister (i.e. regarding left-handed people as
evil).
I hardly can believe that you mean this seriously. Do
Am Sonntag, 17. Februar 2008 14:32 schrieb Peter Verswyvelen:
I don't get why the name isn't arrow instead of arr... Arr reminds
me of pirates, arrrhh ;-)
I guess first was chosen because fst was already taken, but then it
would be logical to choose arrow instead of arr ;-)
arr has two
Simon Marlow wrote:
The point is, GHC has no such thing as the overall program memory
limit unless by that you mean the total amount of memory + swap in your
machine. You can set a limit with +RTS -M, but there isn't one by
default. So what happens when you write a program with a space leak
I'm trying to create a type called SmartArray. It is a type synonym for an
array. If the element type can be unboxed, then SmartArray is an unboxed
array. Otherwise, it is a boxed array.
For instance,
(SmartArray Int Double) is the same as (UArray Int Double)
(SmartArray Int String) is the
Ah, pure stands for pure arrow. I found this confusing since I consider all
functions in Haskell (except unsafeXXX and maybe IO) to be pure. So pureArrow
would be good but is so lng ;-)
Actually, if you look at the way OO programmers design code, they usually
choose long descriptive names,
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Peter Verswyvelen wrote:
But when I show typical Haskell code to object-oriented friends of mine,
they get scared because it looks like math, with all the symbols and
short names.
They will feel like a C programmer looking at C++ code, wondering how the
heck an output
Exactly. And that must be one of the reasons the Java designers said
no to operator overloading? That kind of programmers just don't like
operators I guess. But we do :-) Although I would prefer nice math
symbols and layout instead of the :~ ASCII art.
Thielemann wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008,
On Feb 19, 2008 8:04 AM, Peter Verswyvelen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, if you look at the way OO programmers design code, they usually
choose long descriptive names, like FindElementByName. Most Haskell people
seem more math oriented and use very short names, like fst and snd (which
I apologize if this has already been posted. I sent the following message
several hours ago and I haven't seen it post. So, I'm resending.
I'm trying to create a type called SmartArray. It is a type synonym for an
array. If the element type can be unboxed, then SmartArray is an unboxed
array.
On Feb 14, 2008 10:40 AM, Wolfgang Jeltsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So we should parameterized for the package name.
That's the packagename I've been using. I'm done with a basic
implementation but I'd like to test some other things before showing
the code.
On the other hand, I think that the
Hi,
I have a Haskell library that I want to make available via FFI to C
programmers on my project team. I read this thread
(http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.haskell.cafe/21447) which had
some interesting ideas, but they seemed unresolved. Or maybe it answers
my question but I don't
Am Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 18:26 schrieben Sie:
[…]
However, I was told this: ~ a b is a ~ b, but if I write c a b and
wish the effect of a `c` b. This would not work. ~ as an infix operator
has a special place in GHC. It is not just a type variable.
Sorry, but I don’t understand fully
On Tue, 2008-02-19 at 12:22 +, Adrian Hey wrote:
To be honest, in all my years of Haskelling I can't think of a single
occasion where I've had a program get stuck in an infinite loop. I've
had plenty of stack overflows, and they're reported on the mailing
lists pretty regularly, but on
Am Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 21:44 schrieben Sie:
* Support of type-level Booleans (Wolfgang?)
Attached is just a quickly hacked Boolean module. Nothing very special. I’d
be happy if you could prettify this (choose better names, add documentation,
etc.). Thanks for any effort.
Best
Am Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 17:04 schrieben Sie:
PS: Wolfgang also seems to use nice names in Grapefruit for his types, e.g.
act :: PlainCircuit (IO output) output
createPlainCircuit :: PlainCircuit input output - input - IO (output,IO ())
instead of
act :: PlainCircuit (IO a) a
Am Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 19:37 schrieb Peter Verswyvelen:
Exactly. And that must be one of the reasons the Java designers said
no to operator overloading? That kind of programmers just don't like
operators I guess. But we do :-) Although I would prefer nice math
symbols and layout
2008/2/19 Wolfgang Jeltsch [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Attached is just a quickly hacked Boolean module. Nothing very special. I'd
be happy if you could prettify this (choose better names, add documentation,
etc.). Thanks for any effort.
Thanks to you for the module. I have a few questions though.
Am Mittwoch, 20. Februar 2008 00:39 schrieben Sie:
Why are the value-level reflecting functionsimplemented as type-class
methods? It makes the code more verbose and I don't see any advantage
compared to simply defining a function per class. Let me show you an
example:
This is your
On Feb 19, 2008 4:15 PM, Wolfgang Jeltsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Dienstag, 19. Februar 2008 18:26 schrieben Sie:
[…]
However, I was told this: ~ a b is a ~ b, but if I write c a b and
wish the effect of a `c` b. This would not work. ~ as an infix operator
has a special place in
25 matches
Mail list logo
