-- stm-chans 1.2.0
The stm-chans package offers a collection of channel types, similar to
Control.Concurrent.STM.TChan but with additional features.
--
/usr/bin/ghc --make -package-name show-0.4.1.1 -hide-all-packages
-fbuilding-cabal-package -i -idist/build -i. -idist/build/autogen
-Idist/build/autogen -Idist/build -optP-include
-optPdist/build/autogen/cabal_macros.h -odir dist/build -hidir dist/build
-stubdir dist/build -package-id
Andrew Coppin wrote:
OK, so strictly this is unrelated to Haskell as such. However, there's
enough people doing webby stuff with Haskell that some of you must have
wanted to run your code on a real, Internet-accessible web server. So
does anybody have any suggestions on which companies offer
show is the failing package
A look on Hackage suggests that show had problems with its cabal
file at versions 0.4 0.4.1 and was fixed at 0.4.1.1.
Can you try installing show individually at 0.4.1.1 the try
installing the rest of lambdabot.
___
Linode. Can't recommend them highly enough.
G
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Andrew Coppin
andrewcop...@btinternet.com wrote:
OK, so strictly this is unrelated to Haskell as such. However, there's
enough people doing webby stuff with Haskell that some of you must have
wanted to run your code
On 07/05/2011 09:10 AM, Gregory Collins wrote:
Linode. Can't recommend them highly enough.
If Linode is really the cheapest that the Internet has to offer, I'm
going to need to find a job that pays /significantly/ more money...
(I'm also not sure whether being billed in USD is possibly a
On 06/05/2011 07:16 PM, JP Moresmau wrote:
I use Amazon EC2 Free Tier. You can install Yesod/Warp easily enough
and it's fine for small traffic.
My understanding is that EC2 is only free for 1 year, after which you
pay full price. ($0.02/hour = $15/month if it's running full-time.)
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 12:38, Andrew Coppin andrewcop...@btinternet.com wrote:
On 07/05/2011 09:10 AM, Gregory Collins wrote:
Linode. Can't recommend them highly enough.
If Linode is really the cheapest that the Internet has to offer, I'm going
to need to find a job that pays /significantly/
Hi all,
Manatee-0.2.1 release! (Detail see: http://goo.gl/MkVw
http://goo.gl/PnPbq http://goo.gl/OSpz8)
New features in new version:
* Show welcome page when you first time use Manatee, make manatee easier to use.
* Keymap helper, you just need hit Ctrl+/ or Ctrl+? if you don't know keymap.
*
Then again,
I haven't found many companies that list prices in GBP.)
I use rackhost.co.uk I've had no problems with them at all, and they
charge in GBP. A cheaper alternative is CheapVPS, I moved away from
them since they're not terribly reliable, but probably good enough for
personal websites.
On 7 May 2011 13:52, Nicolas Wu nicolas...@gmail.com wrote:
Then again,
I haven't found many companies that list prices in GBP.)
I use rackhost.co.uk
Oops, I mean rackspace.co.uk, who I believe are the people behind
slicehost.com which comes highly recommended.
Nick
I'm using tilaa.nl. It starts at ~10€/month and they are quite
friendly and competent.
--
Cp
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 13:53, Nicolas Wu nicolas...@gmail.com wrote:
On 7 May 2011 13:52, Nicolas Wu nicolas...@gmail.com wrote:
Then again,
I haven't found many companies that list prices in GBP.)
I've had good experiences with prgmr VPSes; I currently have a 1024MB VPS that
I'm paying $16 a month for (the month by month rate is $20, but I'm paying for
it yearly). You can also grab a 256MB VPS for $8 month by month or $6.40
yearly, if that'd be enough. In the last year I think there was
I am considering hetzner online in Germany -
http://www.hetzner.de/en/hosting/produkte_rootserver/eq4
Ralph Hodgson
@ralphtq
On May 7, 2011, at 6:27 AM, Charles-Pierre Astolfi c...@crans.org wrote:
I'm using tilaa.nl. It starts at ~10€/month and they are quite
friendly and competent.
--
Cp
Sönke Hahn wrote:
There is a related bug report in ghc's trac: [1]. According to that, you
could try to remove the -fvia-C flag to prevent ghc from using the C
backend. (I had no luck with that, so I guess there is still another bug
lurking.)
Just FYI:
I tried again and realised, why I had
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Andrew Coppin
andrewcop...@btinternet.com wrote:
On 07/05/2011 09:10 AM, Gregory Collins wrote:
Linode. Can't recommend them highly enough.
If Linode is really the cheapest that the Internet has to offer, I'm going
to need to find a job that pays
Do you mean O(1) complexity?
Don't you have to touch at least the multiples of 3 5 making it O(k)
where is the number of multiples of 3 and the number of multiples of
5?
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Lyndon Maydwell maydw...@gmail.com wrote:
If you're looking for efficiency, I believe you
One doesn't have to touch them to compute their sum.
2011/5/7 KC kc1...@gmail.com:
Do you mean O(1) complexity?
Don't you have to touch at least the multiples of 3 5 making it O(k)
where is the number of multiples of 3 and the number of multiples of
5?
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:10 PM,
Hi. I am kind of tired of all of the parentheses I have to put in places
and I'm trying to figure out what is the correct way to write code such
that I can leave out parentheses. For example, I have the following:
data Message = ... --leaving this out because it's not important
data Plane =
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/7/11 15:10 , Eitan Goldshtrom wrote:
I get the error Couldn't match expected type `[Char]' with actual type `a0
- c0'. The only way it seems to work is
f p = putStrLn $ (show (Main.id p)) ++ - message received
Interestingly enough, you have
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 2:10 PM, Eitan Goldshtrom thesource...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi. I am kind of tired of all of the parentheses I have to put in places and
I'm trying to figure out what is the correct way to write code such that I
can leave out parentheses. For example, I have the following:
I know about the $ symbol, that's why it's in there in the respective
places. I see that I can use it to fix my problem, but I was trying to
figure out function composition really. I guess that's just not the
place for it. I'll check out Control.Applicative. Also thanks for the
clarification
Got it.
You mean use the formula for summing an arithmetic progression twice
and take account of duplicates.
Sheer genius!
On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Eugene Kirpichov ekirpic...@gmail.com wrote:
One doesn't have to touch them to compute their sum.
2011/5/7 KC kc1...@gmail.com:
Do you
Sorry for third post but I wonder why the many instances are restricted
by Monad.
Both Functor and Applicative can by constructed without Monad:
instance (Functor m) = Functor (CtlArg t m) where
fmap f (CtlArg arg g c) = CtlArg arg (fmap f . g) c
instance (Functor m) = Functor (Iter t
At Sat, 07 May 2011 21:50:13 +0100,
Maciej Marcin Piechotka wrote:
Sorry for third post but I wonder why the many instances are restricted
by Monad.
It would be great if Functor were a superclass of Monad. However,
since it isn't, and since I can't think of anything particularly
useful to do
As another suggestion, you may try HLint [1]. It usually tells you if
you put unnecessary parenthesis. Among other nice suggestions.
[1] http://community.haskell.org/~ndm/hlint/ (or cabal-install hlint)
Cheers, =)
--
Felipe.
___
Haskell-Cafe
On 5/7/11 4:29 PM, Eitan Goldshtrom wrote:
I know about the $ symbol, that's why it's in there in the respective
places. I see that I can use it to fix my problem, but I was trying to
figure out function composition really. I guess that's just not the
place for it. I'll check out
On 5/7/11 5:15 PM, dm-list-haskell-c...@scs.stanford.edu wrote:
In general, I try to place as few requirements in the contexts of
functions as possible.
One counterargument to this philosophy is that there are many cases
where fmap can be defined more efficiently than the liftM derived from
Dear all,
I'd like to write a function maybeShow :: a - Maybe String, which
runs show if its argument is of class Show.
The context and motivation for this are as follows. I have a GADT type
which encapsulates abstract-value computation (or constants or error codes),
a snippet of which
29 matches
Mail list logo
