Re: [Haskell-cafe] can Haskell do everyting as we want?

2010-08-05 Thread Thomas Schilling
On 4 August 2010 21:21, Jason Dagit da...@codersbase.com wrote: Is scion still being developed?  I have the impression it's dead now. Really a shame, I think it has a good solid design and just needs work/polish. It is: http://github.com/nominolo/scion/network I changed the architecture to

Re: [Haskell-cafe] can Haskell do everyting as we want?

2010-08-05 Thread mokus
David Leimbach wrote: On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:16 AM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.comwrote: Just to clarify, I mean: Haskell may be seriously addictive. Sounds like a joke, but it is not. I do not recommend it for coding something quick and dirty. I use it for quick and dirty

Re: [Haskell-cafe] can Haskell do everyting as we want?

2010-08-04 Thread Marc Weber
Hi Qi, have a look at brainfuck language. Its turing complete as Python, Haskell, etc are. Then you'll learn that the quesntion Can I do everything possible is not at all important. You have to ask instead: Can I complete my task in reasonable time and with reasonable runtime performance etc.

Re: [Haskell-cafe] can Haskell do everyting as we want?

2010-08-04 Thread Alberto G. Corona
Before entering haskell, please read our disclaimer: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-cafe/2010-June/079044.html You've been warned * * 2010/8/4 Zura_ x...@gol.ge As already noted here, Haskell is a general purpose language, but you should take it with a grain of salt. For

Re: [Haskell-cafe] can Haskell do everyting as we want?

2010-08-04 Thread Alberto G. Corona
Just to clarify, I mean: Haskell may be seriously addictive. Sounds like a joke, but it is not. I do not recommend it for coding something quick and dirty. 2010/8/4 Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com Before entering haskell, please read our disclaimer:

Re: [Haskell-cafe] can Haskell do everyting as we want?

2010-08-04 Thread Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
Marc Weber marco-owe...@gmx.de writes: Hi Qi, have a look at brainfuck language. Its turing complete as Python, Haskell, etc are. Then you'll learn that the quesntion Can I do everything possible is not at all important. You have to ask instead: Can I complete my task in reasonable time

Re: [Haskell-cafe] can Haskell do everyting as we want?

2010-08-04 Thread Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
Marc Weber marco-owe...@gmx.de writes: Excerpts from Ivan Lazar Miljenovic's message of Wed Aug 04 12:37:29 +0200 2010: functionality in Emacs. I know - I patched the py backend for scion. I'm talking about: node.getParent().getParent().tabAttributes[value] Or (let's talk about a

Re: [Haskell-cafe] can Haskell do everyting as we want?

2010-08-04 Thread Tillmann Rendel
Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:: My understanding of tab-completion in IDEs for Java, etc. is that it just displayed every single possible class method for a particular object value, and then did some kind of matching based upon what you typed to narrow down the list, not that it was type-based.

Re: [Haskell-cafe] can Haskell do everyting as we want?

2010-08-04 Thread Yitzchak Gale
Rogan Creswick wrote: Haskell has very limited support for high-level Natural Language Processing (tokenization, sentence splitting, Named-entity recognition, etc...). Since the role of a general purpose language is relatively new for Haskell, there are many areas where Haskell is still an

Re: [Haskell-cafe] can Haskell do everyting as we want?

2010-08-04 Thread Ivan Lazar Miljenovic
Tillmann Rendel ren...@informatik.uni-marburg.de writes: Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:: My understanding of tab-completion in IDEs for Java, etc. is that it just displayed every single possible class method for a particular object value, and then did some kind of matching based upon what you

Re: [Haskell-cafe] can Haskell do everyting as we want?

2010-08-04 Thread David Leimbach
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:16 AM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.comwrote: Just to clarify, I mean: Haskell may be seriously addictive. Sounds like a joke, but it is not. I do not recommend it for coding something quick and dirty. I use it for quick and dirty stuff all the time, mainly

Re: [Haskell-cafe] can Haskell do everyting as we want?

2010-08-04 Thread Jason Dagit
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:37 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com wrote: Marc Weber marco-owe...@gmx.de writes: Hi Qi, have a look at brainfuck language. Its turing complete as Python, Haskell, etc are. Then you'll learn that the quesntion Can I do everything possible

[Haskell-cafe] can Haskell do everyting as we want?

2010-08-03 Thread Qi Qi
As more I learn haskell, I am more interested in this function programming language. I am intended to more focus on haskell than other languages like python, Java, or C++. But I am still wonder whether haskell can do everyting as other languages do, such as python, perl, Java and C++. Is there

Re: [Haskell-cafe] can Haskell do everyting as we want?

2010-08-03 Thread Don Stewart
qiqi789: As more I learn haskell, I am more interested in this function programming language. I am intended to more focus on haskell than other languages like python, Java, or C++. But I am still wonder whether haskell can do everyting as other languages do, such as python, perl, Java and

Re: [Haskell-cafe] can Haskell do everyting as we want?

2010-08-03 Thread Jeremy Shaw
I use Haskell for everything. In fact, I will be approaching my 10 year anniversary of using Haskell as my primary development language soon. The only area I have had any trouble with Haskell is doing realtime music synthesis. And only because the garbage collector is not realtime friendly. That

Re: [Haskell-cafe] can Haskell do everyting as we want?

2010-08-03 Thread Rogan Creswick
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Qi Qi qiqi...@gmail.com wrote: Is there anyone happen to come into any tasks that haskell is not able to achieve? Haskell has very limited support for high-level Natural Language Processing (tokenization, sentence splitting, Named-entity recognition, etc...).

Re: [Haskell-cafe] can Haskell do everyting as we want?

2010-08-03 Thread Ivan Miljenovic
On 4 August 2010 10:42, Rogan Creswick cresw...@gmail.com wrote: Haskell has very limited support for high-level Natural Language Processing [snip] This isn't a fault of the language, it just I have some hope that jvm-bridge can be resurrected to bind to OpenNLP, but that's something I've