By unanimous opinion the text library is the man.
Thanks to all who answered.
titto
___
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com writes:
I agree with Don. Also, I don't think that a Unicode type should
mention what encoding it uses as it's an implementation detail.
Right. I see from the documentation that it uses Word16s (and presumably
the utf-16 encoding). Out of curiosity, why
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 10:48 +0200, Ketil Malde wrote:
Johan Tibell johan.tib...@gmail.com writes:
I agree with Don. Also, I don't think that a Unicode type should
mention what encoding it uses as it's an implementation detail.
Right. I see from the documentation that it uses Word16s
Hi,
I am looking for an unicode strings library, I found on hackage:
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/compact-string
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/text
They both look solid and functionally complete so ... I don't know which
one to use :-)
As I am sure I am not the first one facing
titto:
Hi,
I am looking for an unicode strings library, I found on hackage:
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/compact-string
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/text
They both look solid and functionally complete so ... I don't know which
one to use :-)
As I am sure I am not the
tittoassini:
2009/9/28 Don Stewart d...@galois.com:
titto:
Hi,
I am looking for an unicode strings library, I found on hackage:
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/compact-string
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/text
They both look solid and functionally complete so ... I
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Don Stewart d...@galois.com wrote:
tittoassini:
2009/9/28 Don Stewart d...@galois.com:
titto:
Hi,
I am looking for an unicode strings library, I found on hackage:
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/compact-string
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 14:16 +0100, Titto Assini wrote:
Hi,
I am looking for an unicode strings library, I found on hackage:
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/compact-string
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/text
They both look solid and functionally complete so ... I don't know
On Mon, 2009-09-28 at 18:32 +0200, Johan Tibell wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Don Stewart d...@galois.com wrote:
tittoassini:
2009/9/28 Don Stewart d...@galois.com:
titto:
Hi,
I am looking for an unicode strings library, I found on hackage:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Don Stewart d...@galois.com wrote:
tittoassini:
2009/9/28 Don Stewart d...@galois.com:
titto:
Hi,
I am looking for an unicode strings library, I found on hackage:
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/compact-string
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Alexander Dunlap
alexander.dun...@gmail.com wrote:
I just have a question out of curiosity - why was the decision made to
have Data.Text, uvector, and ByteString all separate data structures,
rather than defining the string types in terms of uvector?
Hi Bryan and others,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Bryan O'Sullivan b...@serpentine.com wrote:
bytestring predates the other two libraries by several years. The underlying
stream type for uvector and text are almost the same, so they could in
principle be merged. There's a fair amount of
12 matches
Mail list logo
