On 09/04/2013 05:39 PM, Adam Bergmark wrote:
Here are some points I'd like to emphasize in addition to the threads
above, with the disclaimer that I'm the maintainer of Fay.
Fay tries to be very simple, the code base is small (~4800 LoC). This
really lowers the entry barrier for contributions
Hi, I'm also interested in that.
Have you already evaluated haste?
It does not seem to have any of your cons, but maybe others.
What I particularly miss from all solutions is the ability to simply
call parts written in Haskell from Javascript, e.g. to write `fib` and
then integrate it into an
I haven't looked at Haste too much, I'll give it a try.
My main problem is that I would like to find a solution that will continue
working in years (somehow, that will became the solution for generating
JS from Haskell code). That's why I see GHCJS (which just includes some
patches to mainstream
In my opinion haste is somewhere between Fay and ghcjs. It supports more
than Fay, but in difference to ghcjs some PrimOps are not supported
(weak pointers for example).
It is a little bit more direct than ghcjs, in the sense that it does
not need such a big rts written in js.
I like haste
You might be interested in these two comment threads (and maybe the rest of
the comments as well):
http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/1ldqav/thoughts_on_uhc_vs_haste_vs_fay/cbyrhwz
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 04.09.2013, 14:46 +0200 schrieb Adam Bergmark:
You might be interested in these two comment threads (and maybe the
rest of the comments as well):
http://www.reddit.com/r/haskell/comments/1ldqav/thoughts_on_uhc_vs_haste_vs_fay/cbyrhwz
Hi!
On Sep 4, 2013, at 13:02, Niklas Hambüchen m...@nh2.me wrote:
Hi, I'm also interested in that.
Have you already evaluated haste?
It does not seem to have any of your cons, but maybe others.
What I particularly miss from all solutions is the ability to simply
call parts written in
Here are some points I'd like to emphasize in addition to the threads
above, with the disclaimer that I'm the maintainer of Fay.
Fay tries to be very simple, the code base is small (~4800 LoC). This
really lowers the entry barrier for contributions which I think is very
important for open source
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Daniil Frumin difru...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it's nice that you've raised that question, I will think about
implementing a finer API for calling Haskell from JS.
It sounds like something like h$runSyncWithResult (name open for
bikeshedding) that takes an
I second the recommendation to look at Haste. It's what I would pick for a
project like this today.
In the big picture, Haste and GHCJS are fairly similar. But when it comes
to the ugly details of the runtime system, GHCJS adopts the perspective
that it's basically an emulator, where
Niklas: I missed your note about calling Haskell from JS, see this for Fay:
https://github.com/faylang/fay/wiki/Fay-Status-Update-September-2013%3A-ZuriHac%2C-typeclasses%2C-haskell-suite%2C-and-strictness-wrappers#javascript-fay-communication
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Luite Stegeman
11 matches
Mail list logo
