I analysis the data of 100 subjects (one scan for each)
Is it making sense that the mean correlation of the DMN is 0.28 ? (Primary and
Secondary Visual are r=0.5)
From: Glasser, Matthew [glass...@wustl.edu]
Sent: Sunday, March 10, 2019 10:59 AM
To: Tali Weiss
/Schaefer2018_LocalGlobalhttps://github.com/ThomasYeoLab/CBIG/tree/master/stable_projects/brain_parcellation/Schaefer2018_LocalGlobal
Tali
From: Harms, Michael [mha...@wustl.edu]
Sent: Monday, March 04, 2019 9:08 PM
To: NEUROSCIENCE tim; Tali Weiss
Cc: hcp-users@humanconnectome.org
Subject: Re
: Glasser, Matthew [glass...@wustl.edu]
Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2019 5:12 PM
To: Tali Weiss; hcp-users@humanconnectome.org
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] rs-fMRI with-in subject comparison
1. The HCP-YA data were not variance normalized.
2. wb_command -cifti-parcellate
3. There isn’t a good sub-cortical
subcortical volume?
My analysis is “within subject” paradigm (comparing the scans in different
days).
From: Glasser, Matthew [glass...@wustl.edu]
Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2019 3:39 AM
To: Tali Weiss; hcp-users@humanconnectome.org
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] rs-fMRI
Dear Prof.Smith,
I really appreciate your help.
I like to compare the second rs-fmri scan (from two different days) of the same
subject.
1.when i open MSMAII_hp2000_clean.dtseries in WB, I get also a layer "dynconn",
for example: rfMRI_REST1_LR_Atlas_MSMAII_hp2000_clean.dynconn.nii
Are those
