Re: [HCP-Users] HCP behavioral data "Noise_Comp" with -99

ennifer Cc: hcp-users@humanconnectome.org; Hodge, Michael Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] HCP behavioral data "Noise_Comp" with -99 Hi Jenn, Except for Noise_Comp, we also found a weird number -15 (and -14.96) for Mar_Final because all the other values are around 1-2 in this behavior. So we ar

Re: [HCP-Users] HCP behavioral data "Noise_Comp" with -99

Hi Jenn, Except for Noise_Comp, we also found a weird number -15 (and -14.96) for Mar_Final because all the other values are around 1-2 in this behavior. So we are eager to know what is the coding system to mark "missing/erroneous data" for each behavior. Here is the list of behaviors we are

Re: [HCP-Users] HCP behavioral data "Noise_Comp" with -99

Hi Jennifer, thanks. --Jingwei > 在 2017年9月15日，上午1:45，Elam, Jennifer 写道： > > Hi Jingwei, > > The issue you found is limited to the "Noise_Comp" variable, which is the NIH > Toolbox Words in Noise (WIN) Computed score. NIH Toolbox changed the WIN test > from v1 to v2 during

Re: [HCP-Users] HCP behavioral data "Noise_Comp" with -99

Hi Jingwei, The issue you found is limited to the "Noise_Comp" variable, which is the NIH Toolbox Words in Noise (WIN) Computed score. NIH Toolbox changed the WIN test from v1 to v2 during the HCP data collection and only the v1 scores have been correctly released in ConnectomeDB. Those