Nichols
Cc: Krieger, Donald N.; hcp-users@humanconnectome.org
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] Same data / Multiple comparisons ?
Hi Tom
actually the MegaTrawl latest version is here:
https://db.humanconnectome.org/megatrawl/index.html
But yes indeed - early on within the HCP we discussed options for trying
hic measure in the HCP. See also the OHBM COBIDAS report
> <http://www.humanbrainmapping.org/cobidas/>, which implores authors to be
> completely transparent in variables and hypotheses considered but not
> necessarily highlighted in a publication.
>
> -Tom
>
>
>
&g
il.com [mailto:ten.pho...@gmail.com] *On Behalf Of
> *Thomas
> Nichols
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 13, 2016 10:53 AM
> *To:* Krieger, Donald N.
> *Cc:* hcp-users@humanconnectome.org
> *Subject:* Re: [HCP-Users] Same data / Multiple comparisons ?
>
>
>
> Dear Don,
&
Dear Don,
There are no simple answers to this question. Firstly, always be totally
transparent about the set of questions/contrasts you're investigating when
you write up your results. But, when it comes to decide over what set of
results to control multiple testing, I don't think you need to
Dear List,
When a lab analyzes their own data, they control for the degradation in
confidence due to multiple comparisons.
But how does that work when you have many labs analyzing the same data?
At the one end, several labs could do exactly the same analysis and get the
same results.
At the