s
>>>>> is to be expected to some degree because of differences in the
>>>>> correction algorithms or what else might be the reason for this. Could
>>>>> it be the case, for example, that the wrong center is being used for
>>>>>
gt;> > Have you moved table? If you moved the table, you should manually
>> > subtract it from qform, sform, and/or affine matrix in the nifty
>> > header.
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Joo-won
>> >
>> &g
s successfully
>>> cancelled. I apologize if you are receiving this twice now.
>>>
>>>
>>> Quoting "Kim, Joo-won" <joo-won....@mssm.edu
>>> <mailto:joo-won@mssm.edu>>:
>>>
>>>> Hi Kristian,
>>>>
>>&
Institute
> > Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
> >
> >
> > From: <hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org> on behalf of Keith
> > Jamison <kjami...@umn.edu>
> > Date: Monday, April 9, 2018 at 10:36 AM
>
;>> Hi Kristian,
>>>
>>> Have you moved table? If you moved the table, you should manually
>>> subtract it from qform, sform, and/or affine matrix in the nifty
>>> header.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Joo-won
>>>
>>>
t from qform, sform, and/or affine matrix in the nifty
>> header.
>>
>> Best,
>> Joo-won
>>
>> ---
>> Joo-won Kim, Ph.D.
>> Postdoctoral Fellow
>> Translational and Molecular Imaging Institute
>> Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
>>
>>
>
> To: Kristian Loewe <k...@kristianloewe.com>
> Cc: HCP Users <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] gradient nonlinearity correction question
>
> First make sure you're using the right coefficient file, copied
> directly
umn.edu>
> Date: Monday, April 9, 2018 at 10:36 AM
> To: Kristian Loewe <k...@kristianloewe.com>
> Cc: HCP Users <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] gradient nonlinearity correction question
>
> First make sure you're using the right coefficien
From: <hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org> on behalf of Keith Jamison
<kjami...@umn.edu>
Date: Monday, April 9, 2018 at 10:36 AM
To: Kristian Loewe <k...@kristianloewe.com>
Cc: HCP Users <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] gradient nonlinearity co
> Distortion [Correction]".. .A very confusing choice of acronym. You
>>> can
>>> > then compare the online corrected (not _ND) and offline using
>>> gradunwarp.
>>> >
>>> > -Keith
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On W
at 4:44 PM, Glasser, Matthew <glass...@wustl.edu>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Some do for some sequences, but because it is not uniformly applied and
>> >> because they are likely not to use optimal interpolation algorithms, we
>> >> prefer to
4:44 PM, Glasser, Matthew <glass...@wustl.edu>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Some do for some sequences, but because it is not uniformly applied and
> >> because they are likely not to use optimal interpolation algorithms, we
> >> prefer to do offline correction.
> >&
because they are likely not to use optimal interpolation algorithms, we
>> prefer to do offline correction.
>>
>> Peace,
>>
>> Matt.
>>
>> From: <hcp-users-boun...@humanconnectome.org> on behalf of Antonin Skoch <
>> a...@ikem.cz>
>>
nesday, October 19, 2016 at 4:27 PM
> To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org" <hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>
> Subject: [HCP-Users] gradient nonlinearity correction question
>
> Dear experts,
>
> during the set-up of gradunwarp scripts, it came to my mind, why scanner
&
;
on behalf of Antonin Skoch <a...@ikem.cz<mailto:a...@ikem.cz>>
Date: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 at 4:27 PM
To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>"
<hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>>
S
Dear experts,
during the set-up of gradunwarp scripts, it came to my mind, why scanner
vendors standardly do not perform gradient nonlinearity correction directly on
the scanner as part of on-line image reconstruction system (i.e. ICE in
Siemens)?
Regards,
Antonin Skoch
16 matches
Mail list logo
