Re: [HCP-Users] rs-fMRI with-in subject comparison

2019-03-11 Thread Tali Weiss
; Harms, Michael; NEUROSCIENCE tim Cc: hcp-users@humanconnectome.org Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] rs-fMRI with-in subject comparison 1. You would need to ask those authors about that parcellation. 2. That is not a cortical areal parcellation, but could be used for dimensionality reduction. Matt. From

Re: [HCP-Users] rs-fMRI with-in subject comparison

2019-03-10 Thread Glasser, Matthew
quot; mailto:mha...@wustl.edu>>, Timothy Coalson mailto:tsc...@mst.edu>>, Matt Glasser mailto:glass...@wustl.edu>> Cc: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>> Subject: RE: [HCP-Users] rs-fMRI

Re: [HCP-Users] rs-fMRI with-in subject comparison

2019-03-10 Thread Tali Weiss
: [HCP-Users] rs-fMRI with-in subject comparison As for a version of the parcellation with network assignments, see here: https://github.com/ColeLab/ColeAnticevicNetPartition cheers, -MH -- Michael Harms, Ph.D. --- Associate Professor

Re: [HCP-Users] rs-fMRI with-in subject comparison

2019-03-04 Thread Harms, Michael
e.org" Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] rs-fMRI with-in subject comparison There isn't a dedicated command to get the parcel names, but they are in the output of wb_command -file-information on the parcellated file, or you can take them from -cifti-label-export-table on the dlabel file. Tim On

Re: [HCP-Users] rs-fMRI with-in subject comparison

2019-03-04 Thread Timothy Coalson
-- > *From:* Glasser, Matthew [glass...@wustl.edu] > *Sent:* Sunday, March 03, 2019 5:12 PM > *To:* Tali Weiss; hcp-users@humanconnectome.org > *Subject:* Re: [HCP-Users] rs-fMRI with-in subject comparison > > 1. The HCP-YA data were not variance normalized. > 2. wb_command -

Re: [HCP-Users] rs-fMRI with-in subject comparison

2019-03-03 Thread Tali Weiss
: Glasser, Matthew [glass...@wustl.edu] Sent: Sunday, March 03, 2019 5:12 PM To: Tali Weiss; hcp-users@humanconnectome.org Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] rs-fMRI with-in subject comparison 1. The HCP-YA data were not variance normalized. 2. wb_command -cifti-parcellate 3. There isn’t a good sub-cortical

Re: [HCP-Users] rs-fMRI with-in subject comparison

2019-03-03 Thread Glasser, Matthew
February 28, 2019 3:39 AM To: Tali Weiss; hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org> Subject: Re: [HCP-Users] rs-fMRI with-in subject comparison 1. You would need to post the full path and filename. 2. This will be handled by multi-run sICA+FIX in the future. We wil

Re: [HCP-Users] rs-fMRI with-in subject comparison

2019-03-03 Thread Tali Weiss
gt;> Date: Wednesday, February 27, 2019 at 7:26 AM To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>> Subject: [HCP-Users] rs-fMRI with-in subject comparison Dear Prof.Smith, I really appreciate your help. I like

Re: [HCP-Users] rs-fMRI with-in subject comparison

2019-02-27 Thread Glasser, Matthew
ary 27, 2019 at 7:26 AM To: "hcp-users@humanconnectome.org<mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>" mailto:hcp-users@humanconnectome.org>> Subject: [HCP-Users] rs-fMRI with-in subject comparison Dear Prof.Smith, I really appreciate your help. I like to compare the second rs-

[HCP-Users] rs-fMRI with-in subject comparison

2019-02-27 Thread Tali Weiss
Dear Prof.Smith, I really appreciate your help. I like to compare the second rs-fmri scan (from two different days) of the same subject. 1.when i open MSMAII_hp2000_clean.dtseries in WB, I get also a layer "dynconn", for example: rfMRI_REST1_LR_Atlas_MSMAII_hp2000_clean.dynconn.nii Are those