At 22.23 24/06/2003 +1000, Lachlan Andrew wrote:
I agree with Geoff. I don't know though if at this time it is
better to wait for 3.2.0b5 to be out.
Hear, hear! :)
Hi there,
I gave a look at autotools stuff (autoconf, autoheader, autoscan,
automake ...) and I must confess that now life is
Hi friends!
But IMHO, we should be pushing people towards newer compilers with
newer releases. It's pretty clear that new GCC releases will stop
compiling non-ISO C++, so we'll either need to do a lot of conditional
compilation or clean up the code and get people to use newer compilers.
I
On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 21:06, Gabriele Bartolini wrote:
do a lot of conditional compilation or clean up the code and get
people to use newer compilers.
I agree with Geoff. I don't know though if at this time it is
better to wait for 3.2.0b5 to be out.
Hear, hear! :)
Lachlan
--
[EMAIL
I don't think Geoff was saying we *shouldn't* use 2.7.
It's just that we haven't actually *tested* it under 2.7.
If (when :) you can confirm that it still works under 2.8,
Right. Sorry for the confusion. If it works under gcc-2.7, so much the
better!
But IMHO, we should be pushing people towards
Greetings Jesse,
I don't think Geoff was saying we *shouldn't* use 2.7.
It's just that we haven't actually *tested* it under 2.7.
If (when :) you can confirm that it still works under 2.8,
that's great!
Cheers,
Lachlan
On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 00:45, J. op den Brouw wrote:
Hmmm, i'm still compiling
Thanks for the tip about the address -- I was forgetting that these
pages are intended for the BBB (Big Bad WeB).
We don't claim that we compile under gcc-2.7. The old systems are
commented out. (Just my fear of deleting...)
Cheers,
Lachlan
On Thu, 19 Jun 2003 15:30, Geoff Hutchison wrote:
Greetings all,
Are people happy with the tentative timetable I mailed a week ago? If
so, the Unix code should be essentially complete now, and 3.2.0b5
will be released in one week's time. Neal and Jess, do you still
plan to make any changes?
Geoff, could you please post a to-do list for the
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Lachlan Andrew wrote:
Greetings all,
Are people happy with the tentative timetable I mailed a week ago? If
so, the Unix code should be essentially complete now, and 3.2.0b5
will be released in one week's time. Neal and Jess, do you still
plan to make any changes?
