Hi all,
WE are running z/OS 1.6 with no plans to upgrade because we aren't going
to fork out any more for Tivoli 8.3. We also have Enterprise COBOL.
This is the problem...
The file was allocated Cyl,(15,5) and 16 records written to it by
the COBOL program, it thus expanded to 3 volumes and
I really like this list. :)
_
Thomas Berg Specialist IT Utveckling Swedbank AB (Publ)
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Craddock, Chris
Skickat: den 22
Van Dalsen, Herbie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
Hi all,
WE are running z/OS 1.6 with no plans to upgrade because we aren't
going
to fork out any more for Tivoli 8.3. We also have Enterprise COBOL.
This is the problem...
The file was allocated Cyl,(15,5)
Kees,
That is actually that happens...
Step1 creates the file,
Step2 Makes a backup, using IDCAMS, and the backup does have 16000
records, and step3 does the sort...
very weird...
//DEL005 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14
//DD3 DD DSN=HUBRECHT.SORTINOUT,
// DISP=(MOD,DELETE,DELETE),
//
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 01:31:45 -0500, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
At 1:38 PM -0600 on 1/21/08, Paul Gilmartin wrote about Re: How does
ATTACH pass address of ECB to child?:
When the mother needs the daughter's assistance, it WAITs on the
second ECB, clears it, and POSTS the first.
ONLY IF the
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/21/2008
at 11:10 AM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I have believed, and other updates to this thread appear to concur, that
WAIT/POST are older than CS. At some time, then, WAIT/POST code must
have used some other locking mechanism.
That much is true.
Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
t...
Van Dalsen, Herbie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
Kees,
That is actually that happens...
Step1 creates the file,
Step2 Makes a backup, using IDCAMS, and the backup
Kees,
What bugs me is the following...
Whether we have 90,000 of 160,000 records, the final number remains
Display from COBOL PGM... T735 WRITTEN = 050634
Display from DFSORT...RECORDS - IN: 45900, OUT: 45900
Display from COBOL PGM... T735 WRITTEN = 052687
Display from DFSORT...
Van Dalsen, Herbie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
Kees,
That is actually that happens...
Step1 creates the file,
Step2 Makes a backup, using IDCAMS, and the backup does have 16000
records, and step3 does the sort...
very weird...
//DEL005 EXEC
I don't quite understand the confusion either between BC and EC. I always kept
them straight by remembering that B is before E in the alphabet, so therefore
the BC is the smaller one. Also, you can think B for Basic.
Eric
Timothy Sipples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ted, what are the
Mark,
I think the word is scalability... If you have a business that is
growing at the pace of 26 MIPS per year, the BC is for you, which means
you can go up with smaller increments not having the ISV's crippling
your cash flow because you was forced to go to a MSU100 from the MSU50
you had, even
You can be certain that POST will always support the CS quick-post protocol
and the LOCAL LOCK.
I'm curious, as nothing pops to mind: has there been any case where the
serialization of a documented programming interface has changed? Maybe I
should limit my question to z/OS BCP where compatibility
I told you: you can rely on the DFSort team to react promptly.
Great service!
Kees.
David Betten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
om...
Herbie,
Send the sysout from your job directly to me ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
and
I'll take a look. We may need you to open an ETR
That was my initial thinking, but I did not want to cloud anyone else's
thinking...
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Shedlock, George
Sent: 22 Januarie 2008 01:05 nm
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DFSORT anomaly?
Is it
Thanks Kees,
We came up with a similar idea about the same time you sent the previous
email about the separate in/out, although I did not want to bite on it
as a cause because I have seen sort inside COBOL programs using the same
in/out.
Will be interesting to see where this is going...
Regards
Herbie,
Send the sysout from your job directly to me ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and
I'll take a look. We may need you to open an ETR on this but let me take a
look first.
Have a nice day,
Dave Betten
DFSORT Development, Performance Lead
IBM Corporation
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DFSORT/MVSontheweb
Is it possible that the COBOL program is not closing the file and
therefore any additional extents are not reflected in the VTOC / Catalog
entry?
George Shedlock Jr
AEGON Information Technology
AEGON USA
502-560-3541
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:00:52 -0500, Peter Relson wrote:
You can be certain that POST will always support the CS quick-post protocol
and the LOCAL LOCK.
OK. I'll be confident. But why is this not documented in the
Assembler Services Reference? Interestingly, there, I see for POST:
#
What confused me though was why could IDCAMS copy the whole file to a
backup?
Regards
Herbie
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Van Dalsen, Herbie
Sent: 22 Januarie 2008 01:20 nm
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DFSORT
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Peter Relson) writes:
You can be certain that POST will always support the CS quick-post protocol
and the LOCAL LOCK.
re:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/21/2008
at 04:12 PM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Whose trademark is Firewire?
I believe that it's an Apple® trademark for an IEEE standard that Apples
does not own.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
Does anyone have a url for the above that contains the bookshelf for DB2
Version 9 for z/OS. I've got the following one but it only goes up to DB2
Version 8 -
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/handheld/Connected/library
Jim McAlpine
I haven't seen any job output yet but I wanted to share this information
from DFSORT Application Programming Guide
***
For a copy application, the SORTIN data set should not be the same as the
SORTOUT data set or any OUTFIL data set because this can cause lost or
incorrect data or unpredictable
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:46:17 +, Jim McAlpine
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have a url for the above that contains the bookshelf for DB2
Version 9 for z/OS. I've got the following one but it only goes up to DB2
Version 8 -
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-
Sorry for the slightly off-topic question, but how come this persons posts
are always so complicated to work through with all of the pieces and URL
links? Is it the function of how they are posting (i.e. perhaps online with
certain options), or is this a manual effort?
I'm hoping to not spark a
Here it is again !!!
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr/Shelves/dsnshka1
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
You can look at the FSR record (type 5) in SMF and it'll have the info.
Also you should look at the archive because there was a lot of discussion
about corrupted restores, not recall, as best as I can remember. Sometimes
users mix up restore and recall..
Jack Kelly
202-502-2390 (Office)
David,
I was under the impression that Anne Lynn Wheeler is in fact some sort of
Turing machine inspired effort and not a real person at all.
It seems to get triggered every once in a while on certain keywords and then
inserts a load of ancient history into the related post.but then again
Thanks for that, The only problem that I have is the fact that 45900
seems to be some sort of a threshold, and that if you have less than
45900 records to sort/copy it does not happen.
Regards
Herbie
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
David Logan wrote:
Sorry for the slightly off-topic question, but how come this persons posts
are always so complicated to work through with all of the pieces and URL
links? Is it the function of how they are posting (i.e. perhaps online with
certain options), or is this a manual effort?
When I installed my new z/OS 1.9 system I specified that I wanted to use zFS
for OMVS. root, sibmroot, and var were created as zFS, but .etc was created
as HFS. Is anyone aware of a reason that .etc is still HFS? Should I be
able to convert it to a zFS?
Thanks
--
Mark Pace
Mainline
Hello all,
here is some Wiki news.
1. The first old CICS website has been adopted into the Wiki. Check it out
at http://cicswiki.org/cicswiki1/index.php?title=CICSCentral
2. I added the Yellow brick moment where Bob Yelavich will entertain us
with CICS trivia.
Your problem is OPTION COPY.
With OPTION COPY you are not really sorting.
In a real sort you would read ALL of the input and then write the
output. In that case the input and output can be the same file.
What is happening in your case is you are reading and writing to the
same file at the
David Betten wrote on 01/22/2008 06:53:52 AM:
I haven't seen any job output yet but I wanted to share this information
from DFSORT Application Programming Guide
***
For a copy application, the SORTIN data set should not be the same as the
SORTOUT data set or any OUTFIL data set because this
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/19/2008
at 09:26 PM, Tony Harminc [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I imagine it's more a case of running a batch TMP. You should be able to
send and receive command input and output, but I would guess that a
command trying to prompt would get a nasty RC from GETLINE or
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:22:19 -0500, Mark Pace [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
When I installed my new z/OS 1.9 system I specified that I wanted to use zFS
for OMVS. root, sibmroot, and var were created as zFS, but .etc was created
as HFS. Is anyone aware of a reason that .etc is still HFS? Should I
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (David Logan) writes:
Sorry for the slightly off-topic question, but how come this persons posts
are always so complicated to work through with
Edward,
It may be better asked off list, but I have been wondering the same
thing for a long time as well. Frankly, I'm glad the question was asked.
Can anyone offer a definitive answer? Or just speculation?
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL
I should not ask the question, but do they exist or is it a 'virus'
inside IBM-MAIN?
Herbie
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Hardee, Charles H
Sent: 22 Januarie 2008 04:08 nm
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Wheeler
Thanks to everyone for replying to this. I am definitely going to get
the apps guys to change the JCL. I just haven't whether it would be to
change it to a sort, or create a second dataset. Will read the
recommendations between the lines of the DFSORT manual...
Regards
Herbie
-Original
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
Anne Lynn Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
for another reference there was this article in ibm systems mag. 3 years
ago although some of the details are
Corneel - I've just created myself an ID on the CICS Wiki - how do I
become a member of the Team?
--
Regards - Grant
Grant Ward Able
Senior Systems Architect
DTCC
Corneel Booysen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM
Hi,
I need some help to understand what will happen with GDG data sets under
control following GDG index:
//MYJOB JOB (1234),'BODRA'
//STEP1 EXEC PGM=IDCAMS
//SYSIN DD *
DEFINE GDG(NAME(MYLIB.LIB.TEST)-
LIMIT(02)
Excellent, thank you.
Jim McAlpine
On 1/22/08, Ramiro Camposagrado [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here it is again !!!
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr/Shelves/dsnshka1
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
---snip-
I need some help to understand what will happen with GDG data sets
under control following GDG index:
//MYJOB JOB (1234),'BODRA'
//STEP1 EXEC PGM=IDCAMS//SYSIN DD *
DEFINE GDG(NAME(MYLIB.LIB.TEST)
Lynn has answered that question a while ago. Check the archives. (His or
ibm-main's)
--
Tom Schmidt
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom Schmidt
Sent: 22 Januarie 2008 04:51 nm
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Wheeler Postings (Was: How does ATTACH pass address of ECB
to child?)
Lynn has answered that question a
In [EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 01/22/2008
at 10:00 AM, Rob Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
but then again that could describe quite a few board members :-)
There are none; this is not a boars.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
Thanks, This way I will not have to impact the jobs lower down the
stream...
Regards
Herbie
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Betten
Sent: 22 Januarie 2008 04:36 nm
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: DFSORT anomaly?
I would change the dataset names instead of changing the copy to a sort.
Today, probably not much difference but if the file size grows over time,
the copy is going to be faster and require less resources than a sort. I'd
change the following
Add a DD5 to your initial DEL005 step with a new data
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
(I did say clear the ECB before POSTing the other task, didn't I?)
That's should, not must. And why not? It can't really matter,
because even if the code is the minimal:
WAIT
L R1,ECBPreserve condition code
XCECB,ECB
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:33:16 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 01/19/2008
at 09:26 PM, Tony Harminc [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I imagine it's more a case of running a batch TMP. You should be able to
send and receive command input and output, but I
Thanks for the information and suggestions. DAE doesn't show anything
recent for the LPAR in question.
We're going for the simple minded plan, too! We already stop and restart
our production initiators freqently, for other reasons, and we will now
do the same for the applications development
One little glitch remains. The mother needs to know when the daugnter
is ready to accept more work. Either of the following works:
o The daughter can simply clear the ECB to zeroes and the mother
can use this as an indication that the daughter is ready to be
POSTed. But in some
And you can try VSM CHECKREGIONLOSS parameter of DIAGxx
Atenciosamente / Regards / Saludos
Ituriel do Nascimento Neto
Banco Bradesco S/A
4254/DPCD Alphaville
Engenharia de Software - Sistemas Operacionais Mainframes
Tel: 55 11 4197-2021 Fax: 55 11 4197-2814
|-Mensagem
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 08:00:52 -0500, Peter Relson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can be certain that POST will always support the CS quick-post protocol
and the LOCAL LOCK.
I've never understood why, after all these years, IBM hasn't put the
quick-post code right into the POST macro. Of course
(I did say clear the ECB before POSTing the other task, didn't I?)
That's should, not must. And why not? It can't really matter,
because even if the code is the minimal:
WAIT
L R1,ECBPreserve condition code
XCECB,ECB Clear ECB
Craddock, Chris wrote:
More typically you also need to develop a robust queuing mechanism for
passing work requests and responses between requesters and servers. That
is because, if you look dispassionately at the ECB as an interface,
there is no way to avoid the potential of missing an
Here, for instance:
http://groups.google.com/group/bit.listserv.ibm-main/msg/7941aee482af5b4
8?
Jon
snip
Lynn has answered that question a while ago. Check the archives. (His
or ibm-main's)
/snip
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
Just to clarify this from my experimenting, SDB does not do the trick;
IEBGENER hurks up a hairball if you try this.
Thanks,
Jon
//STEP1 EXEC PGM=IEBGENER
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSIN DD DUMMY
//SYSUT1 DD PATH='/path/to/file.tar',FILEDATA=BINARY,
// DCB=(RECFM=FB,LRECL=1,BLKSIZE=8000)
We have been running etc as a zFS since 1.6
Actually, we were running zFS on all OMVS files except for root since 1.6
at 1.8, I did zFS for the root as well.
No more HFS
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
Thanks for the tips, folks. I think I'm going to switch to pax for now,
and I have downloaded omvstape to look at later.
By the way, there is a slight misprint in the 1.8 Unix commands manual.
To add parameters to dictate space allocation and such, the format is
something like this:
pax -W
zFolks,
What are specific concerns in the field for IBM mainframe
education or knowledge requirements:
1. When a IBM z/OS (zLinux) or mainframe Sales Rep., IT Architect,
FTSS (field technical support) or ITS (IT Specialist) comes to your site
to: market,
explain integration,
I'm sorry for this late reply but as of z/OS V1R8, msys for Setup is no longer
used.
Debbie Noll
z/OS UNIX ID planner
John Mattson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is msys for Setup widely used? Is it useful to some of you?
It looks like it could have potential, but maybe someone hear has
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 12:37:34 -0500, Gerhard Postpischil wrote:
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
(I did say clear the ECB before POSTing the other task, didn't I?)
That's should, not must. And why not? It can't really matter,
because even if the code is the minimal:
WAIT
L
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:40:10 -0500, Jon Brock wrote:
Thanks for the tips, folks. I think I'm going to switch to pax for now,
and I have downloaded omvstape to look at later.
OK, since this came back, I wrote earlier off-list to whoever suggested
pax that both tar and pax can use Classic data
They need to realize that System z z/OS.
John H Kettner wrote:
zFolks,
What are specific concerns in the field for IBM mainframe
education or knowledge requirements:
1. When a IBM z/OS (zLinux) or mainframe Sales Rep., IT Architect,
FTSS (field technical support) or ITS (IT
I had sent an earlier post that got lost in the ether
You could simply change the input of the COPY step to use the GDG
generation you created in the BACKUP step.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Betten
Sent:
I'm not sure why the Dialogs created it as HFS, and everything else as zFS.
I went ahead and converted it to zFS and I now I'm totally zFS.
Thanks for the information.
--
Mark Pace
Mainline Information Systems
--
For IBM-MAIN
John H Kettner wrote:
zFolks,
What are specific concerns in the field for IBM mainframe
education or knowledge requirements:
1. When a IBM z/OS (zLinux) or mainframe Sales Rep., IT Architect,
FTSS (field technical support) or ITS (IT Specialist) comes to your
site to: market, explain
Hi all... we converted over the weekend from z/OS 1.4 and CA TCPIP to z/OS
1.7 with both IBM and CA stacks. The IBM stack is running all sockets, etc.
The CA stack only does telnet and ftp. My problem...
We use the old EPS product to send prints from the mainframe to network
printers and it is
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:51:29 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote:
Craddock, Chris wrote:
More typically you also need to develop a robust queuing mechanism for
passing work requests and responses between requesters and servers. That
is because, if you look dispassionately at the ECB as an interface,
Or, if you absolutely, positively want/need to keep the output in the
dataset you initially created, simply change the JCL to use the GDG you
created in the IDCAMS step as the input dataset to the COPY.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL
Thank you
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 13:22 -0500, Craddock, Chris wrote:
Did I mention it was a crap mechanism?
I must have missed that nuance - could you explain a little what you
mean ???
.
.
.
g,d,r
Shane ...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:51:29 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote:
Rather, to request that a service task perform some function, one should
put the request on a queue and then POST the ECB on which the service
task WAITs for work. (Note: In a design involving multiple requesters,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Craddock, Chris
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 1:29 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: How does ATTACH pass address of ECB to child? (1
Snipped
In anything but the most trivial case
They need to know and understand that not everyone runs just z/OS, DB2 and
Websphere. Some of us (non-team-players) run z/VM and Linux and have real
non-Websphere workloads on both z/VM and Linux.
/Tom Kern
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:59:19 -0500, John H Kettner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
zFolks,
Hi,
'Comes to the site ?
a) They need to know :
1) What the customer is licensed for
2) Who the audience is
3) What their Claim to fame is
4) What to indentify the Customers needs
5) When to say I do not know, but i will get back to you
b) They should not have to
1) Have the latest bells and
I want to thank everyone who responded to my question. I have passed
this information on to our development staff. They are going to
evaluate each suggestion and see which one best fits our needs.
Thanks,
Ray
Phone: (502) 564-8952
e-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From:
On Tue, 2008-01-22 at 13:31 -0600, Johnston, Robert E wrote:
In times of busy printing (like today) messages come from EPS
say no local ports available.
LPR (the printer client) is historically defined to use one of ports
721-731. If you have more than 11 simultaneous LPRs going on a single
I am trying to write out a Unix System Services file --
a tar archive -- to tape. For simplicity's sake, I was
planning on using IEBGENER, but I'm a bit confused as to
what file characteristics to use for this.
Anybody out there have any sample JCL?
Unix tar files have a length that is a
On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 22:29:39 -0600, Darren Evans-Young
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
It's amazing how a post degenerates into
a wild rumour. (not your post Shmuel)
...
Actually, this thread started in a pretty degenerate state - asking
about rehosting IBM-Main. Our own FUD added UA dropping
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Farley, Peter x23353) writes:
Granted, but the converse is also true: A posix-style semaphore or
queuing mechanism is way overkill for the
Glen,
Thanks for this information. I don't think I have seen this any
place else.
Jon
snip
Unix tar files have a length that is a multiple
of 512. I would expect either RECFM=FB LRECL=512,
or RECFM=U and a block size some multiple of 512.
Each file stored in a tar file has a 512
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:49:34 -0800, Edward Jaffe wrote:
Rather, to request that a service task perform some function, one should
put the request on a queue and then POST the ECB on which the service
task WAITs for work. (Note: In a design involving multiple requesters,
many such requests
Would you mind, Paul, giving a couple of examples of real life programs
that you are thinking about?
I know personally that I couldn't get my head around this stuff unless I
imagined some sort of application and how it would work using threads.
Three things came to mind: How does DB2 do it?
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
Aha! At last I see. That answers my question to Peter R. But I
was envisioning a technique in which only one task at a time updates
the queue, handing it back and forth with two ECBs. Now there's
still need to manage concurrent accesses to the queue. I suppose
CS can
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 17:00:07 -0600, Paul Gilmartin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Whenever the queue is empty, the queue emptier WAITs. But if the
queue is storage constrained, it can fill up. What does the
queue filler do then?
...
I don't think there can be a general answer to that question.
On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:28:42 +0100, Lindy Mayfield wrote:
Would you mind, Paul, giving a couple of examples of real life programs
that you are thinking about?
With apologies: It's been decades since I did it; the language was
not Assembler but Pascal; it would be difficult or impossible to
find
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 18:28:02 -0600, Patrick O'Keefe wrote:
I don't think there can be a general answer to that question. If the
queue is full the queue filler has to stop putting stuff on the queue.
That means it has to stop accepting (or generating) its input, or has
to throw that input away.
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jon Brock) writes:
Here, for instance:
http://groups.google.com/group/bit.listserv.ibm-main/msg/7941aee482af5b48?
i.e. also archived here
Craddock, Chris wrote:
Nope! After a normal post the compare value is going to be X'4000'
and the swap value is going to be 0. If another post intervenes and
stores another X'4000' in place of the first, then the compare is
going to succeed and you'll miss a valid post. There's no way
Whenever the queue is empty, the queue emptier WAITs. But if the
queue is storage constrained, it can fill up. What does the
queue filler do then?
There are at least two types of queues; static queues, where all of the
elements are pre-allocated/formatted by the queue owner and dynamic
Lindy Mayfield wrote:
I know personally that I couldn't get my head around this stuff unless I
imagined some sort of application and how it would work using threads.
Assume you have a start task that is designed to service
requests from VTAM terminals. With the current VTAM design, one
task
Gerhard wrote:
Craddock, Chris wrote:
Nope! After a normal post the compare value is going to be
X'4000'
and the swap value is going to be 0. If another post intervenes and
stores another X'4000' in place of the first, then the compare
is
going to succeed and you'll miss a valid
I don't understand the reams of discussion about how to handle multiple
threads working on a single ECB, or even a single thread spuriously posting
an ECB. It isn't what it was designed for.
To me, saying that ECB is a poor design is like saying a bicycle is poor
design because you can't use it
I agree that having a virtual printer feature may not be very useful.
I wonder, though, if a feature to create virtual tape in AWSTAPE format,
either on a remote PC or on the mainframe itself as a file, would be useful.
When we ran z/OS under FLEX-ES, we had the capability to run z/OS jobs
On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 21:36:02 -0500, Craddock, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
...
I've been using it a little while myself :-) and so I do agree that when
used entirely within it's most tightly constrained boundaries it
works. But as I pointed out earlier there are many unobvious traps for
the
I don't understand the reams of discussion about how to handle
multiple
threads working on a single ECB, or even a single thread spuriously
posting an ECB. It isn't what it was designed for.
Given it was the only mechanism provided, by definition it was intended
for all synchronization
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo