Thanks a lot, now i know it is a normal behaviour.
See you,
Enrique Montero
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
I am out of the office until 29.08.2011.
No Mail access - in urgent cases call me on my mobile phone.
You may also contact my colleague Werner Bauer or Peter Kimmel.
Note: This is an automated response to your message IBM-MAIN Digest - 6
Aug 2011 to 7 Aug 2011 (#2011-219) sent on 8/8/2011
-- Forwarded message --
From: Shai Hess mfnetd...@mfnetdisk.com
Date: Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:49 AM
Subject: MFNetDisk what I see after you download my code using CODE_REQ.
To: shai.h...@gmail.com
**
HI,
Many new and return MFNetDisk users are download MFNetDisk code.
I attach
Hi,
I was able to migrate it successfully. Thanks all for your valuable
suggestion.
Regards,
Jags
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 8:13 AM, jagadishan perumal jagadish...@gmail.comwrote:
Thanks I will definetly take your Inputs and read accordingly.
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 8:03 AM, john gilmore
I need to update common storage from my IEFU85 SMF exit. I am currently using a
compare and swap loop to serialize on this update but I think there is a
problem with this approach and looking at using SETLOCK. My question is...
IEFU85 is in cross memory mode. I need the CMS lock. To get the
Just out of curiosity, what is your problem with CS? Perhaps PLO would be
better? It has more functions.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone *
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011 07:06:45 -0500 Donald Likens dlik...@infosecinc.com
wrote:
:I need to update common storage from my IEFU85 SMF exit. I am currently using
a compare and swap loop to serialize on this update but I think there is a
problem with this approach and looking at using SETLOCK. My
I prefer MicroSnotG
snip
I spell it M$ or Micro$oft.
/snip
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
I will be out of the office starting 08/08/2011 and will not return until
08/09/2011.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
In 20110808044727.2e36a7d...@mail.ase.com.au, on 08/08/2011
at 01:19 PM, Graeme Gibson gra...@ase.com.au said:
yes, it was immediately obvious from the multiple atrocities
committed in the Subject:
How was it worse than other forgeries?
As for the body text, where to start, where to end!
In AANLkTinDc1=m+5dkw2expgmgz+hrviotbm3mwzro5...@mail.gmail.com, on
08/12/2010
at 09:06 AM, zMan zedgarhoo...@gmail.com said:
I remember some old IBM code (EXEC 2 source on VM) that had comments
like do this while R2 settles; that surely held true when the code
was written,
Shirley knott.
It is highly unlikely that you would need a CMS lock. If you are in a properly
established cross memory environment then PASN is going to stay put. There are
multiple ways of serializing storage modifications w/o resorting to a lock.
FWIW to get a CMS lock (there's more than one) you must
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
What are you using to do tracing, if I may ask, please?
I'm using a modified version of BWwhois[1] to do lookups. I've also got a RYO
utility[2] that scans the entire e-mail and looks up all of the relevant names
and addresses for use in reporting the spam.
[1]
Staller, Allan wrote:
I prefer MicroSnotG
Well, don't blow it! :-D
:-D :-D :-D
Groete / Greetings
Elardus Engelbrecht
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu
On Sat, 6 Aug 2011 20:16:30 -0700, Edward Jaffe edja...@phoenixsoftware.com
wrote:
Wow! SHARE sold out its room allocation at the Dolphin. Overflow at the Swan
also sold out. Some people are staying at an off-site hotel. Yikes! Glad I
booked when I did...
That's a good problem to have! Things
Iris isn't going to be at SHARE encouraging everyone to do a survey?? That
will make it all just a little less fun...
Greg
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Iris
Rivera [iriv...@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, August
I have successfully created the multi-volume LDS;
DEFINE CLUSTER (NAME(ZFS.Z112S.CPAC) -
VOLUMES(ZFS001 ZFS002-
ZFS003 ZFS004 )-
DATACLAS(DCZFS) -
LINEAR CYL(10014 5) SHAREOPTIONS(3))
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011 21:40:11 +0800, Lim Ming Liang limm...@unifi.my wrote:
I have successfully created the multi-volume LDS;
DEFINE CLUSTER (NAME(ZFS.Z112S.CPAC) -
VOLUMES(ZFS001 ZFS002-
ZFS003 ZFS004 )-
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011 09:00:44 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote:
2000,2000 ? Multiple extents don't hurt and DFSMS has been
combining multiple (new) adjacent extents into a single extent
for a while now.
How can that happen? Aren't extents allocated one-by-one, so
only one can be new? Or does the
I have a job with four steps:
Step 1 IEFBR14 - allocate a specific dataset = (MOD,DELETE) - to make sure it
is not there
Step 2 allocate it (NW,CATALOG,DELETE) - this step does not open the dataset
Step 3 Use Connect Direct to write to this dataset from the LAN - the dataset
name is in the CD
I am doing this the first time without in-depth understanding of it.
I am following the zFS Administration Guide, Chapter 4 as an example.
I will define VVDS on those volumes first, see any changes affected.
Regards Lim ML
On 08/08/11 10:00 PM, Mark Zelden wrote:
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011 21:40:11
How can that happen? Aren't extents allocated one-by-one, so only one can be
new? Or does the specification require only one, not both, to be new?
I believe it started with 1.7.
If the extents are side by side, they are consolidated into one.
Originally, it was only on secondary volumes.
SMS, when it extends, looks to see the new extent starts where the old extent
ends. If it does, then instead of creating a new extent entry in the VTOC,
simply updated the current end-of-extent entry for the current extent. Just a
little more logic to automatically coalesce the extent entry
I had my gmail account hijacked a year ago. They did it by getting access to my
session cookies. What I have learned is that you should ALWAYS log-out, use pop
or imap if possible and try and avoid public hotspots and public computers.
Also do not select the Remember Me option.
If you are
I defined VVDS for the rest of the volumes.
Now I get this;
IOEZ4I Formatting to 8K block number 169020 for primary extent of 734
ZFS.Z112S.CPAC.
IOEZ5I Primary extent loaded successfully for ZFS.Z112S.CPAC.
IOEZ00323I Attempting to extend ZFS.Z112S.CPAC to 1070280 8K blocks.
IGD17272I
I assume Step 3 actually scheduled the C:D process to be run by the C:D
started task using the DMBATCH program. It doesn't actually perform the
copy. So when you run Step 4, how do you know the C:D process has
finished?
Have you considered running the 'Step 4' program as a step in the C:D
Hello everyone,
Does CA-FAVER support LBI (large block) when writing to tape?
Thanks in advance,
Yifat Oren
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the
Bart,
I wondered about that - yes we (I say we - I'm the sysprog trying to sort out
his allocation problem - I know virtually nothing about C:D) are using DMBATCH
-
so that means the CD address space is doing the transfer ? However it is the
DMBATCH step (step 3 in my scenario) that is
Yes, from the manual:
quote
The FAVER2 Transparency uses the Large Block Interface (LBI) to read the
| CA-FAVER2 tapes. LBI was introduced in OS/390 2.10 and is available in all
levels
| of z/OS. CA-FAVER2 is capable of writing tape blocks with a BLKSIZE of 64K, so
| the DEVSUPxx member of your
Your job will continue to enq the dataset until the last step that allocates it
in the JCL. When you remove step 4, the dataset is no longer enqueued by your
job after step 2. That being said, I don't see why that would stop step 3 from
executing.
Step 3 is basically scheduling your C:D
Thanks for the suggestion.
The real step 4 will be an APL program running under IKJEFT01 that analyses the
data create an APL Matrix and save it in an APL workspace - I will suggest
trying to run it as a task.
Nigel
Nigel Wolfendale
From: van der Grijn,
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011 10:42:24 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
Yes, from the manual:
quote
The FAVER2 Transparency uses the Large Block Interface (LBI) to read the
| CA-FAVER2 tapes. LBI was introduced in OS/390 2.10 and is available in all
levels
| of z/OS. CA-FAVER2 is capable of writing tape blocks
Accurate observation always trumps the book! Manuals can be wrong. Or maybe
they meant for it to use LBI and messed up.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone *
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011 22:52:01 +0800, Lim Ming Liang limm...@unifi.my wrote:
I defined VVDS for the rest of the volumes.
Now I get this;
IOEZ4I Formatting to 8K block number 169020 for primary extent of 734
ZFS.Z112S.CPAC.
IOEZ5I Primary extent loaded successfully for ZFS.Z112S.CPAC.
You might try submitting a job with from the started task, or
submitting from Step4 after Step3 initates the task and completes. If
the allocation in Step3 occurs before Step4 tries to allocate it, it
will wait until Step3 completes. If the job with Step4 starts before
Step3 allocates it, it
Could you provide output for the following?
D SMS,STORGRP(ZFSCLASS),LISTVOL
LISTCAT ENTRIES('ZFS.Z112S.CPAC') ALL
Regards,
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Lim Ming Liang
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 7:52 AM
To:
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011 09:22:23 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
SMS, when it extends, looks to see the new extent starts where the old extent
ends. If it does, then instead of creating a new extent entry in the VTOC,
simply updated the current end-of-extent entry for the current extent. Just a
little
no cost for it. The reason, as I was told, for the max number of extents was
due to the number of F3 DSCBs in the VTOC for an extent. So if you consolidate
two extents into a single extent, then it is one extent from that point on. And
only counts as 1 extent.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer
We have a number of VSAM clusters whose catalog statistics are totally garbage.
Now, this does not affect proper processing. But I dislike not having accurate
or at least semi-accurate record counts. Is there any way to reset the catalog
statistics other than unload/delete/define/reload? I
Perhaps a call to the vendor is in order. Or go online to their support
site and research the issue.
- Don Imbriale
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Yifat Oren yi...@tmachine.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
Does CA-FAVER support LBI (large block) when writing to tape?
Thanks in advance,
VERIFY?
ISTR an apar a while back about this. A quick search was unable to
locate the apar.
snip
We have a number of VSAM clusters whose catalog statistics are totally
garbage. Now, this does not affect proper processing. But I dislike not
having accurate or at least semi-accurate record
VERIFY doesn't seem to make the record counts correct. I want to use them
because I'm doing some VSAM dataset moves and the record count is what I use to
guess how long an individual dataset may take. On z/OS 1.10.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
Gil,
It does indeed allow the job to have more space than originally intended. I
just copied a PS dataset into a sequential VSAM dataset defined as primary and
secondary extents of 3 tracks long. The final VSAM dataset ended up at 11172
tracks, and 42 extents. The extents were anywhere from
Take the high used RBA and divide by the record size. That is the
maximum number of records you could have, could be significantly less.
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 12:54 PM, McKown, John
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote:
VERIFY doesn't seem to make the record counts correct. I want to use them
Thanks. I hadn't thought of that.
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone *
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message
List,
I have been searching and searching. We running CSP370 AD V4R1 and I have
been trying to locate some softcopy manuals. Does anyone happen to know
where I might be able to find some?
Thanks,
Craig
**
This
On 19 Jul 2011 16:33:35 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main Ed Gould
wrote:
John:
Thanks for the good information. I steered my client away from BDT when it was
first announced as being to expensive and did not meet all our needs as not
all the shops we talked to were IBM /or/ they were not likely
I don't know CSP. By chance are these them?
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/Shelves/EZESET03
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
HealthMarkets(r)
9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone *
Thank you John!
Thanks,
Craig
McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
08/08/2011 02:13 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
To
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
cc
Subject
Re: CSP/370 AD Manuals
Last time I had to do this I did an export/import of the file to get the
numbers correct. But I would do a little investigation to see what caused the
incorrect information.
Ed
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
From what I can tell as a pure guess: program abends which cause CLOSE to not
update the statistics and we did have an entire system crash (z/OS died but I
don't remember why - weird hardware problem, I think).
--
John McKown
Systems Engineer IV
IT
Administrative Services Group
Nigel Wolfendale wrote:
I have a job with four steps:
Step 1 IEFBR14 - allocate a specific dataset = (MOD,DELETE) - to make sure it
is not there
Step 2 allocate it (NW,CATALOG,DELETE) - this step does not open the dataset
Step 3 Use Connect Direct to write to this dataset from the LAN - the
Cancelling a CICS region that has the file open is known to cause this, since,
like a program abend, the statistics are not updated.
David Mueller | Systems Programmer
SSRC (Southwood Shared Resource Center)
2002 Old St. Augustine, Bldg C, cubicle W-67
Mail: 2585 Shumard Oak Blvd,
Does the DCZFS data class specify a volume count?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Lim Ming Liang
Sent: Monday, August 08, 2011 6:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Creating a multi-volume compatibility mode
JCL would override that, or in this case the VOLUMES() input to IDCAMS. You
can
see all the candidate volumes were assigned in IDC0508I, so that is not the
problem.
BTW, as in the last example I posted, the candidate volumes can be defined
with just * in the IDCAMS VOL keyword.
Mark
--
Mark
Does this then allow the programmer more space than initially
requested/intended, or does it deduct 1 from the number of
extents allowed when it does this? 123...122...121...
Why would it deduct anything?
It's a single extent after consolidation.
Also, the extent limits have been raised, as of
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011 20:43:03 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
Does this then allow the programmer more space than initially
requested/intended, or does it deduct 1 from the number of
extents allowed when it does this? 123...122...121...
Why would it deduct anything?
It's a single extent after
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011 15:57:59 -0500, Paul Gilmartin paulgboul...@aim.com wrote:
I was thinking of the case where a programmer used SPACE() cautiously
to limit the space occupied by a data set -- he might prefer to endure a
Sx37 rather than have a single data set written by a runaway program
On 8 Aug 2011 13:58:44 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011 20:43:03 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
Does this then allow the programmer more space than initially
requested/intended, or does it deduct 1 from the number of
extents allowed when it does this? 123...122...121...
snip---
Q: How many personal injury attorneys does it take to change a light bulb?
A: Three–one to turn the bulb, one to shake him off the ladder, and the third
to sue the ladder company.
We have a number of VSAM clusters whose catalog statistics are totally
garbage. Now, this does not affect proper processing. But I dislike not having
accurate or at least semi-accurate record counts. Is there any way to reset
the catalog statistics other than unload/delete/define/reload
The
Yes, indeed.
Regards Lim ML
On 09/08/11 4:32 AM, Mark Zelden wrote:
JCL would override that, or in this case the VOLUMES() input to IDCAMS. You can
see all the candidate volumes were assigned in IDC0508I, so that is not the
problem.
BTW, as in the last example I posted, the candidate volumes
IGD002I 06:52:24 DISPLAY SMS 689
STORGRP TYPESYSTEM= 1
ZFSCLASS POOL+
VOLUME UNITSYSTEM= 1 STORGRP NAME
ZFS001 0A97+ ZFSCLASS
ZFS002 0A98+
VERIFY?
VERIFY just validates fields and closes the file.
It doesn't recover unrecoverable stats.
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
On 8 Aug 2011 15:23:57 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
---snip---
Long ago space allocation should have been changed to be initial,
increment, maximum rather than just initial and increment. One way to do
that might be
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011 17:23:18 -0500, Rick Fochtman wrote:
---snip---
Long ago space allocation should have been changed to be initial,
increment, maximum rather than just initial and increment. One way to do
that might be to honor the
Hi Mark,
I did as you suggested and getting somewhere now;
IGD17070I DATA SET ZFS.Z112S.CPAC
ALLOCATED SUCCESSFULLY WITH 1 STRIPE(S).
IGD17172I DATA SET ZFS.Z112S.CPAC
IS ELIGIBLE FOR EXTENDED ADDRESSABILITY
IDC0508I DATA ALLOCATION STATUS FOR VOLUME ZFS002 IS 0
IDC0508I DATA ALLOCATION STATUS
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:45:46 -0700, Sam Siegel wrote:
...
I've yet to see an open system person have even a vague understanding
of record oriented I/O or PDS processing.
OS/360 and its progeny have only a vague understanding of record oriented
I/O. Consider that QSAM is the record oriented
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 07:24:35 -0500, Mary Anne Matyaz wrote:
The new listserv. Fonts, layout, etc. Yuk. :(
And when I do an Archive Search, I'm presented with a hit list.
If I select a hit to view it, then exit back to the hit list, it appears
to re-drive the query. How wasteful! (I should
In a6b9336cdb62bb46b9f8708e686a7ea00afc0ed...@nrhmms8p02.uicnrh.dom,
on 08/08/2011
at 07:21 AM, McKown, John john.mck...@healthmarkets.com said:
Just out of curiosity, what is your problem with CS? Perhaps PLO
would be better? It has more functions.
The basic rule is that all parties must use
In 4e3f747b.2020...@valley.net, on 08/08/2011
at 01:30 AM, Gerhard Postpischil gerh...@valley.net said:
And I seem to recall that A0 was the opcode for loading emulator
instructions on the 360/165.
360/85? 370/165?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see
In p0624080cca64e1b9dff0@[192.168.1.11], on 08/07/2011
at 08:48 PM, Robert A. Rosenberg hal9...@panix.com said:
Thanks to the Wikipedia S/360 article I was able to download a copy
of the S/360 PoPs manual can confirm my impression that ALL the S/360
opcodes were one byte long
No; as I
In p06240808ca64d6fd5bb4@[192.168.1.11], on 08/07/2011
at 08:00 PM, Robert A. Rosenberg hal9...@panix.com said:
Are any of them S/360 opcodes or were the introduced with S/370+
architecture?
S/360, also S/370. AFAIK the emulator features were not available on
anything later than the 370/168.
In 00fc01cc5541$5889c1c0$099d4540$@us, on 08/07/2011
at 03:34 PM, Jim Thomas j...@thethomasresidence.us said:
That said, yes, I do not remember much from my Univ. days (as I've
said before .. I don't remember what I ate for dinner last night ...
:-) ), but .. mathematically written (and since
In 4e3ee8fa.6080...@bcs.org.uk, on 08/07/2011
at 08:35 PM, CM Poncelet ponce...@bcs.org.uk said:
But you seem to be saying that, unless I can cite from your book the
chapter and verse that supports my argument, my argument is false.
No, neither I nor the others have said that. What we said
In 80dad7d8-9d2c-42c1-aa35-6414e507e...@optonline.net, on 08/07/2011
at 06:54 PM, Micheal Butz michealb...@optonline.net said:
Think the B2 opcodes are all two bytes
The B2 opcodes came later. Some of the emulator features on the S/360
had longer opcodes.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz,
Gerhard,
The X'A0' opcode provided various VS APL Assist functions.
I don't believe that IBM ever documented it in any publication distributed to
customers.
John P. Baker
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
shmuel+ibm-m...@patriot.net (Shmuel Metz , Seymour J.) writes:
The B2 opcodes came later. Some of the emulator features on the S/360
had longer opcodes.
diagnose (x'83') is supervisor instruction defined as model
specific. common mechanism was the displacement field was used as
extended
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In 4e3ee8fa.6080...@bcs.org.uk, on 08/07/2011
at 08:35 PM, CM Poncelet ponce...@bcs.org.uk said:
But you seem to be saying that, unless I can cite from your book the
chapter and verse that supports my argument, my argument is false.
No, neither I
On 8/8/2011 11:05 PM, John Baker wrote:
The X'A0' opcode provided various VS APL Assist functions.
I don't believe that IBM ever documented it in any publication distributed to
customers.
In the sixties I wrote a little program to run through all
possible opcodes, which turned up some
We want to Hard Capped LPAR in an LPAR Capacity Group because we want to create
a consistent environment for stress test, if we use a defined capacity to cap,
during the initial run capacity available then the later stage when it's
capped hence a difference in results/response time etc. With a
I did see this number of times...answer reside in jcl reference with DISP
description.
When any step of a job requests exclusive control of a data set (through
DISP=NEW, DISP=MOD, or DISP=OLD), the system converts all requests for shared
control of that data set within that job (DISP=SHR) to
82 matches
Mail list logo
