In <4e3ee8fa.6080...@bcs.org.uk>, on 08/07/2011 at 08:35 PM, CM Poncelet <ponce...@bcs.org.uk> said:
>But you seem to be saying that, unless I can cite from your book the >chapter and verse that supports my argument, my argument is false. No, neither I nor the others have said that. What we said was that you were wrong, period, and that in the case of software it is the documentation that determines how things are supposed to work. The fact that you were also wrong about how it actually works was gravy. >As far as credibility is concerned, do you remember saying that my >proof that 0.999...<recurring ad infinitum> is equal to 1 was false >- and that, when I pointed out that this was not my proof but that >taught by my university, you said my university was wrong (or words >to that effect)? No, but it's common for the mathematically naĆve to make errors when attempting to construct a proof. >The University of Liverpool is renowned worldwide as a leading >authority in mathematics. Sturgeon's law. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html