How many have complained here and not followed up with a call to IBM?
How many have called 1-800-543-3912 and tried to get a resolution?
First they insisted that I use www.ibm.com/ibmlink but I finally
convinced them that didn't work either.
So they tried it and have now opened a Sev 1. (15:14
Not only can you order a product in CBPDO format for internet delivery a
number of us have received a whole z/OS serverpac via the internet.
Alan
Dumb question: does IBM only distribute various fixes electronically, or
can
you get an entire newly-ordered product via the Internet?
Charles
Any one else having problems with IBMLink and ShopzSeries sites today?
Sometimes I get logged on sometimes I don't. Our proxy server times out
trying to get to ShopzSeries.
I ordered PUT0702 for internet delivery and trying to download it I get
connection reset by peer - every time I try and
NOT THE 3270 VERSION. It is usually up and working. They are trying to
get rid of it, but is much easier to use (for me) than the web based
stuff.
Mark House
I know. Then they have the audacity to tell us this when you log on:
Since ServiceLink VM is being removed, there will be no changes
If one needed a source control system that could be handled via TSO,
where could one find such?
We use software from these folks: http://www.dcmsi.com/
Alan
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
Since IBMLINK isn't too reliable maybe we should go back to
1-800-237-5511.
Does it even still work?
A sudden increase in call volumes (assume thay track that stuff) should
garner attention from someone.
Alan
--
For
I was hesitant to even go and ask our firewall guys but finally did.
You should see the length of the ETR I have open before I got that one
nugget from the support people to say it was broken!!
Is there a place in IBM that cares that you can address a complaint to?
My firewall guys will
An earlier post suggested changing the allocations in the HMC and
IPLing.
I believe you need to also deactivate the LPAR to get it to process the
image profile to pick up the changed memory allocations.
In Bob's case he might need to deactivate both LPARs to get the one to
give up the storage
Kirk,
A 2094-S18 could be many different models.
We have three S08 and two S28 processors.
The 0 represents one book, (1 represents 2 books) the 2 represents 3
books.
The S08s are 702 and 703 models, (2 and 3 cpus) the S28s are 706 and 707
(6 and 7 cpus).
So on our S28s the 6/7 cpus are
One of the application programmers asked: If I have program A doing a
dynamic call to Program B, is the working storage of program B preserved
between calls?
By observation he seems to recall in the past (years ago) it was, but
current program behaviour would suggest that the storage is reset.
Don't be too quick to congratulate IBM.
I just got this feedback from them after failing to lonon to
Resourcelink.
Did you change your password recently?
The IBM registration authentication system is having problems and they
estimate it will take hours to process/replicate all password change
gil:
It does the whole PDS on 1.6 and 1.8. I just tried.
How about: transmit host.user DA('sys1.macllib(splevel)')
For a test of something else, I ran the job step:
//TOJESEXEC PGM=IKJEFT01
//SYSTSPRT DD SYSOUT=(,)
//SYSTSIN DD *
transmit host.user ddname(INDD)
We have VIEW R11 running on our 1.8 system.
If I put an S beside the jobname I get it all in one file. If I put a ?
I get the individual pieces - just like SDSF does.
Alan
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent:
There is a Getmain/freemain storage trace process that might be easier
than the technique you propose. I have used it in the past but don't
know where it is documented.
My old doc says The GETMAIN/FREEMAIN storage trace is documented in IBM
manual Component Diagnosis and Logic: VSM LY28-1809
LISTSERV, my browser, cookies and passwords won't play together and I
can't search the archive.
Does ILR005E message automatically roll off the screen at IPL time?
Ours does - at some point I had a zap to change the descriptor code on
the message but it isn't applied now, I also have en entry
Thank you Jim.
Does ILR005E message automatically roll off the screen at IPL time?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
The archive search and I aren't getting along this morning.
Are there any recommendations for a MIH value for FICON CTCs?
We haven't got anything specified in IECIOSxx but are having some
difficulty getting VARY commands to them to complete.
We're wondering if there is a
The S/360 had a push button on the console labeled External Interrupt.
I don't recall ever using it (but that would have been in 1970-71).
When generating a SA DUMP IPL test you can list a series of addresses
For the console it is to use. In this case, providing an External
Interrupt by pressing
Check out the SVCTAB program in files 66 or 133 (same program if I
remember right) from www.cbttape.org
The unused SVCs all share the same dummy address.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ward, Mike S
Sent: Tuesday, January
We have a CICS program that builds the parameter list and then issues
the CA-7 SVC to
Demand jobs.
This worked on CA-7 Rel 3.3,
We have just tried (and had to fall back) to upgrade to CA-7 11.0
because this technique
No longer works.
CA's response id that the parameter list format
Alan said: Here's the source:
IOSTEMC CSECT 0001
IOSTEMC AMODE 31 00020002
IOSTEMC RMODE ANY 00030002
***
00040001
* IOSTEMC SOURCE CREATED AFTER DISASSEMBLING THE EMC PROVIDED MODULE *
00050001
* GOES IN
Varun,
I think you need the PSP (Prentative Service Plannning) information.
You can find it on IBMLINK.
You should also research and implelent the Enhanced PSP planning tool
that can be found on the IBM web site. Also search the IBM-MAIN archives
for information
about it
Alan
Varun
Jack,
I believe you can get an TCP/IP interface card for the LMU (where your
current
3270 CO-ax goes) so that the ICC becomes a viable option.
We;ve been trying to get our LMUs upgraded with it each budget cycle but
but it always seems to get pulled. I dont think they are very expensive .
Thanks for pointing this out Ed.
I agree with the other responders that Single Object Operations what is
implied here.
More interesting though is the recommendation to use this method. I
suppose a change
has been made in z/OS 1.8 as I've always seen it recommended that to CF
the CHP
Neither:
COBOL (Common Business Oriented Language)
CoBOL doesn't fit the standard acronym
My memory is failing me on this one.
I thought it was:
Common
Oriented
Business
Operating
Language
So, you're saying:
COmmon
Business
Operating
Language
Hal,
I think you are referring to the reserved lpar capability.
We just upgraded our processors and since we had to POR I defined a number
of lpars as reserved, name(*).
Now when we want a real lpar we will just unreserve one of them and o a
dynamic activate.
Haven't done that part yet to
One of our CF lpars is defined with 4096MB.
The OS messages display says 4029 allocatable.
4096 - 4029 = 67
This is CFCC level 14.04.05
What is size of memory occupiend by CFCC ?
I heard two very different answers: 8MB and 64MB.
Just curious.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
Accurate or approximate?
It depends on blocking factor, media type
For 3390s I use 56664 (bytes per track) * 15 (tracks per cylinder) for an
approximate value.
Hi,
Is there a formula for this ? Also Gb to cyl.
Thanks
Dean
Dean Montevago
Sr. Systems Specialist
Visiting Nurse Service of
ShopzSeries is no better - can;t get into it either.
Chase, John wrote:
It's been about 10 minutes since I submitted the sign-on, and no
response yet
This is getting ridiculous! I've been trying all morning to access my
ESC for a *real* hardware problem with no luck! Someone at
Ah - but do you have a member in PARMLIB named LNKLST00?
Even if it is a null member. I think that is what the message is telling
you.
You might have a list of datasets that will become your linklisted
datasets in PROG00
Alan
We lost an LPAR in the Parallel Sysplex because of the situation
described in HIPER APAR OA18015.
One of the LPARs couldn't access the couple dataset and we ended up in a
WAIT 0A2.
According to IBM this condition is more likely to occur on z9s (we just
upgraded the week before)
becuase of the
Judy,
It's in the SMF records 60-69 (I think).
I haven't used it myself but the usually recommended s/w is DAF from
www.cbttape.org.
I can't access CBTTAPE at the moment to verify whether my SMFSRCH program
is there too.
Alan
Judy Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe
Pat,
I forget where you started with this but could you have used the BUILDMCS
function to get all your stuff out of the
old CSI and populate the new one?
Patrick O'Keefe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
11/10/2006 10:36
Please respond to
IBM
Contact CA.
Here's the URL I use to get to the logon page (It'll probably wrap).
Howard,
We just upgraded to a z9 on Sunday and started getting 0C4s. We quickly
moved Easytrieve 6.4 0311
into production (had been running ain development) and no more 0C4s.
What level of EZT are you on? Have you checked with CA for mtce?
Alan
Howard Brazee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:
http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/leapsec.html
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Anne,
Assume R0 contained 4095.
After the ED instruction M1CC has X'F4F0F9F5'
Now you AND it and M1CC contains X'04050905'
and youTRanslate it back to X'F4F0F9F5'
If what you want printed is X'0FFF' you need code similar to the
following:
ST R0,IN
UNPK
Anne,
No POR necessary. Just DEACTIVATE the LPAR. When you reactivate it will
honour the specifications
in the image profile.
Alan
Anne Crabtree [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
10/19/2006 12:00
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
No. Three rows of 32. The cards are 3 1/4 by 2 3/4. I have some in my
archive.
Kirk Talman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
10/12/2006 10:50
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
I allocated a 3 volume zFS dataset and formatted it.
I attempted to format many more blocks than were alloacted.
The format step ended with:
IOEZ00326E Error 8 extending xxx
IOEZ00328E Errors encountered making xxx zFS aggregate.
Is the dataset usable?
I deleted it and reran the job with
I started the thread because I am setting up a zFS for z/OS 1.8.
I've got 3 mod nines with 450,045 tracks. Is this going to be big enough?
Alan
Brian Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
09/28/2006 13:26
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe
Big enough to download z/OS 1.8 from ShopzSeries.
McKown, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
09/28/2006 15:10
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: zFS Question
CPF macro?
In PARMLIB(IEFSSNxx) entry?
Internal to the program?
Specified in the PARMS for the program?
Chase, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
09/27/2006 15:25
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
Are you looking for the ADYUPDAT ISPF macro?
My doc says its described in MVS Diagnosis: Tools and Service Aids.
Alan
George D Dranes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
09/26/2006 06:42
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Mike,
I'd try disabling and then rebuilding the vtoc index before you go as far
as re initing.
Sounds like there is an entry in the index that isn't on the volume.
ICKDSF BUILDIX ...
Mike Szyszka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
09/22/2006
SETSSI command -
Daniel A. McLaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
07/18/2006 07:48
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Dynamic Stuff
We would like to activate OAM and
Bruno and Timothy:
We have TSM 5.x but when we went to order 5.3 we were told the licencsing
had been changed
from MLC to an one time charge equal to about 7 years of MLC.
Management said NO.
The storage admins would like to have 5.3 but with such an exhorbitant
cost I expect we'll be
What catalog is AUL1 going to? What about AUL1$?
Is the alias defined to a user catalog?
Does the user have the ability to update the catalog?
Alan
The job is failing with the following RACF errors:
ICH408I USER(TSOSDB ) GROUP(TSOUSR ) NAME() 176
AUL1$.SAS.FORMATS CL(DATASET )
I have 2 CHPIDs connected to the same switch and accessing like devices.
Does anyone know the difference between TYPE 4 and TYPE 5? I can't
figure out why one shows as a type 4 and the other as a type 5.
04 ESCON SWITCH OR POINT TO POINTCNC_?
05 ESCON SWITCHED POINT-TO-POINT CNC_S
Thanks Brian - I believe you are right (just tried it). It's been while
since I
had to use that command.
Either way I think my explanation is correct.
This looks like a cut/paste output from the MVS D M=CHP command.
Brian
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 13:32:07 -0500, Alan C. Field wrote:
04
So, any others care to tell about their Linux on Z POCs or
implementations? Did your projects stay on schedule and run
smoothly? Did you have to hire new people or were the existing
zOS or *nix people in your shop able to handle it? How much help
did you need / get from IBM or other
Thanks Matthew.
We tried the SET GRSRNL but the change won't complete as long
as there are TSO users logged on.
SYSIKJUA is the resource we're trying to change, hence the IPL (it's the
development
system) will be the easiest way.
Mark Z - thanks - I removed SYSIKJUA from the RNL because I
We have two separate parallel sysplexes. We logon to TSO on one image of
each sysplex.
We try to logon to a second image. On one sysplex we get this:
IKJ56425I LOGON rejected, UserId xxx already logged on to system SYS1
IKJ56400A ENTER LOGON OR LOGOFF-
On the other sysplex the logon
Thanks. We looked at the RNL before posting the question and two of us
decided they were
the same. One system had SYSIKJUA commented out in the RNL though.
Have to wait till all TSO users are off or IPL to make the change.
Check your GRS RNL list for SYSIKJUA.
Don Imbriale
Paula,
Not sure exactly what you want but SHOWZOS from www.cbttape.org displays
Registered and
unregistered products. Rel 712 is current. Roland just distributed 713 to
the Beta testers.
Rob was possibly alluding to the free version of MXI - I think it still
exists.
Thanks, Rob, but I
That is perfectly legal in my mind.
Vendors compile code on their system and ship you the modules you run on
yours.
This is no different.
Isn't it the z8xx you can RUN COBOL programs compiled elsewhere, but not
compile them?
Alan
Suppose we licensed a COBOL compiler for one system;
Howard,
In the message IEC030I
B37-04,IFG0554A,SHUUSR3X,STEP01,SYSUT1,0A95,WORK11,SYS06121.T
SYSUT! is the DD statement that is experiencing the B37. Since you don;t
have as SYUT1 in the JCL it must
be using the one defined in the DDDEFs.
Either add a SYSUT1 to the JCL with greater size or
Three options:
1 - Allocate a dataset with more directory blocks. Copy from the old one
to the new one, delete and rename.
2 - If you have PDSFAST from SEA it has an expand directory blocks
control statement.
3 - Check at www.cbttape.org for a progam named EXPDIR which does the same
thing.
Where in storage is the ACB? Below or above the line.
Is your program AMODE 31?
Good afternoon, IBM-MAIN
I am trying to dump several areas that are supposedly passed to a
subsystem
open routine. Basically, following the GPSAM logic:
DUMP$IT A=SSOB,L=SSOBHSIZ
L R2,SSOBINDV
Thanks for the help on and off the list. We're almost there.
After the TSS admins reloaded certificates and did whatever else they did,
I finally got to a point
where I got this message:
GIM69198S ** CERTIFICATE SMPCERT WAS NOT FOUND CONNECTED TO KEY RING
@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: SMP/E internet retrival
Alan C. Field wrote:
GIM69207S ** THE CONNECTION WITH THE SERVER FAILES.
FAILES? How embarrassing! Looks like it's time IBM implemented spell
checking for message text!
(I assume it's meant to be FAILED.)
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software
Has anyone got this working with Top Secret???
We got a cookbook from CA outlining the steps but so far we
haven't successfully managed to retrieve any service.
Infer what you want about our Top Secret admins.
Alan
--
For
I agree with Mark, but I think you are referring to reserved lpars - I
thing you have to
do a POR at least once to define them.
I tried to make a couple of ours that we no longer used reserved but it
meant taking
all the channel definitions away which seemed like a lot of work only to
have to
Are they asking about the overhead of collecting them, and/or the overhead
of processing them to
derive useful information - or hadn't they thought of that.
Please do not laugh.
My management is asking me how much overhead is consumed by z/OS for
processing the SMF records. I have no idea.
OS/MVT and OS/VS2 TSO Data Utilities: COPY, FORMAT, LIST,MERGE User's
Guide and Reference.
SC28-6765-4 - March 1974. 66 pages
Program Product 5734-UT1
Where's TSO COPY documented? I just got to wondering idly how hard it
would
be to write a clone or semi-clone (without the bugs, or at least
Yes - I finally get a PC at work that can read DVD's.
I can read the first documentation DVD, then IBM starts producing them on
the
higher density DVDs and I can't read them again, :(
Even two DVDs would be better than 8 CDs.
IBM also puts most of this information on CDs
Every (nearly
John,
Your issue is that the device type is stored in the catalog entry. 3490s
have X'78048081'
3480's have some thing similar, but I haven't got any now to look what it
is. So a request
without a UNIT specified will try and match the device with a now
undefined device type.
I do remember
You don't mention what processor you have. Is the OSA Integrated Console
Controller an
option?
I would vote for this option if you have it, secondly the VTAM SMCS
consoles. We are using
both options as well as 3174 attached consoles.
We'de get rid of the 3174's if we could get the $$$ to
Thanks, Ed,
I knew that - we looked at the Visara and ruled it out.
I think a couple of boards for the LMUs are really pretty cheap.
Alan C. Field wrote:
We'de get rid of the 3174's if we could get the $$$ to convert the STK
LMUs to TCP/IP
Visara console controllers provide support
Run ann EREP job and look at the output.
On our z/OS 1.6 system this is what it says: LEVEL = VERSION 3 RELEASE 5
I'm pretty sure your 2.10 system will be the same.
Here's the FMID EER3500
Where may I find out what version of EREP we are running(OS/390 V.210)
TIA
Eric,
Almost I think.
The Sysplex Timer is a big clunky box. It connects to a PC as it's
console
We have a modem plugged into the PC that dials out to NIST.
I think the CLO (CLOck?) card is the card in the processor that connects
to
the Sysplex timer.
On 17 Mar 2006 09:34:16 -0800,
in
What release of z/OS are you?
Either Keith Clapp's SNTP code or the SNTP server that is part of z/OS.
Have all the
other platforms synchronize to z/OS.
We have been doing that for about 4 years - seems to be working well once
we
overcame the political/idealogical problem that z/OS could
See SG24-2070 S/290 Time Management and IBM 9037 Sysplex Timer
300 plus pages.
My interpretation is that the Sysplex Timer IS the ETR.
You connect it to an ETS (External Time Source), modem dialing NIST (what
we do here),
GPS or WWV receiver and that gets the timer in sync with the rest of
Luis,
This sounds like a question based in Unix terms.
Access to resources (programs, TSO, datasets etc.) on a z/OS system is
controlled by one of three security products.
RACF from IBM, Top Secret from CA or ACF2 also from CA.
Rules are defined within these products. To determine which
This says for subsystem SLSP ( which I guess is the STK subsystem to run
the tape SILO, we
call ours SLS0) cut an SMF record every 30 minutes.
In the SLSP setup ypu define what SMF record number to use (in this case
the STK default
if I remember right) 255.
IBM reseres SMF record numbers 1
Here's what I have on our SYSPROG LPAR.
VSM CHECKREGIONLOSS(500K,10M)
We have one job that always seems to cause
IEF093I INITIATOR TERMINATED DUE TO REGION LOSS
since turning this on.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
Are you letting IBMLINK search all the libraries, MVS and Associated
products, Program PRoducts,
Technical Q A etc?
I got 4 hits on it:
ERROR DESCRIPTION:
IDA0192Y is trying to free the VEB twice causing an ABENDA78.
It should free the pointer to the VEB in the IOMB at the first
These are probably APPC Transactions.
When a D J,L command is issued, the response is message IEE114I, showing a
list of jobs and STCs. Those that are jobs have J next to them, and STCs
have S next to them. We have one that has an A next to it. According to
Messages and Codes, A
Heres the response off my z/OS 1.6 system to D UNI:
13.09.48 CUN3000I 13.09.47 UNI DISPLAY 820
ENVIRONMENT: CREATED 03/07/2006 AT 10.42.01
MODIFIED 03/07/2006 AT 10.42.09
IMAGE CREATED 06/24/2005 AT 09.55.40
Try D UNI,ALL - lots of infr
Have you got APPC and ASCH started tasks, possibly ASCHINIT tasks?
Richard Tsujimoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
03/07/2006 13:02
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re:
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 15:51:29 +0100, Vernooy, C.P. - SPLXM
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I supppose activate of an already active LPAR does effectively nothing.
Then Mark Z said No, it will activate the current definitions which
will include destroying the running LPAR.
I agree, but wasn't Kees
I've been surprised by the number of unique solutions to this problem.
I was trying to avoid jumping in, but I'm surprised no one has suggested
the
following:
//TSO EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01,REGION=4096K,DYNAMNBR=75
//SYSPRINT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSTSPRT DD SYSOUT=*
//SYSTSIN DD *
PROFILE
Have you tried the RESET CN(name) to force the console off?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Could you PUNCH out your deck using the panels and save the output.
Then you can simply edit the PUNCH file to make the changes and run the
batch program to migrate the deck back in?
Something like:
//MIGRATE EXEC PGM=CBDMGHCP,REGION=256M,
// PARM='MIGR,IP,SY1,2084-B16,LPAR'
Your PARMS work for me. Are you sure they are being applied to the COMPILE
step?
PP 5655-G53 IBM ENTERPRISE COBOL FOR Z/OS 3.4.0 XXX
DATE 02
00 XX DS0H PROGRAM:XX
USING *,15
00 47F0 F028
I just wrote a quick program to do the STOW with the initialize option.
We
have the APAR on our z/OS 1.4 system. Guess what, Mark - it only works
for
a PDSE, not a PDS. The return code for a PDS is x'1C', which states that
only PDSEs are supported. Please start beating.
I ran a similar
Jay,
DId you get the PL/I tape? I hope so as it was the only copy I had.
Did you find time to unload it yet?
Thanks,
Alan
Jay Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
01/18/2006 13:48
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Glen,
Jay's post:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 12:05:20PM -0600, Alan C. Field wrote:
DId you get the PL/I tape? I hope so as it was the only copy I had.
Yes, I have it, and had no problems reading it.
It's available at http://www.ibiblio.org/jmaynard/ssp-pl1.aws .
I'd never seen PL/I code
Thanks to the list for all the advice.
We have changed the JCL to use a separate precompile step and are making
progress.
PQ81622 (Thanks Rob) explains at least one of the problems.
Alan
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff /
Thanks for all the responses.
We tried 0M, we tried 64M, never considered 128M but we'll try.
As Roland suggested its looking for X'FA0' 4000dec below the line.
Available region below is about 10.5Mb
Here are the compiler options:
PP 5655-G53 IBM ENTERPRISE COBOL FOR Z/OS 3.3.1
We sent a bunch of COBOL source off-site to get it massaged.
Now we have it back and some of the source won't compile. Enterprose 3.3.1
compiler.
By that I mean the 140,000 source line program blows the compiler.
We've been juggling with the SIZE and BUF parameters and feel we've
squeezed
www.share.org and look for future conferences
http://www.share.org/Events/future_conf.cfm
Gene Muszak [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
01/10/2006 16:04
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
I did a search on GOOGLE for SC28-6830 and got this:
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg2d37db3ef98da032e85256e550073182caid=1
Kittendorf, Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
01/03/2006 15:46
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe
I looked at out XPAF JCL and this is what I see: Notice they are all
comments.
//* **
//* PSF LIBRARIES*
//* **
//*
//*IBMFONT DD
Bruce,
Someone else posted but VTUBES from MACRO4 should be on your list.
We've used it for 10+ years and it seems to do the job.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
We've run with AMRF(N) for years.
Health Checker says this is the preferred state.
One must presume the folks in CONSOLES know what they are doing
Don't you need to have AMRF=Y set in order to capture (and display)
outstanding action messages? (Not all sites run with AMRF=Y... my
current
What if you punched out the deck, you could then edit it and migrate it
back in?
Folks,
Some years ago I created a partition for our then test IFL to bring up
z/VM and Linux. I still can't remember the whys but it ended up being
defined as MVS. We've had no problems until now. We want
Mark
Its been a while but I think the SETR will show what you want - I haven;t
got a RACF system
to verify.
Alan
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
Thats intersting.
I took your source and my assemble step gets an S0C1 abend immediately.
I have up to PUT 0510 maintenance on the assembler.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
We have one lpar that the CPC screen of RMF reports the following:
Partition: P0D2084 Model 308
CPC Capacity: 448 Weight % of Max:
Image Capacity: 392 WLM Capping %:
All the other lpars report CPC and Image capacity are the same.
We can't find where this
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
