Re: STK-SUN-Brocade switch--2032 IOdef

2008-06-09 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
I had assumed this was an activation issue. Did this configuration ever work? If not I would definitely revisit your switch and port values. I would also make sure things are really plugged in, etc. It would be easier if I could see your configuration, but below is a brief example... The

Re: FICON CTC

2008-03-03 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
I would guess your logical addresses are not right. Can you share your IOCP? Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Pace Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 11:32 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: FICON CTC Is a

Re: FICON CTC

2008-03-03 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
I believe this is what you want your control units to look like. CNTLUNIT CUNUMBR=3C00,PATH=((CSS(0),3C)),UNITADD=((00,008)), * CUADD=4,UNIT=FCTC CNTLUNIT CUNUMBR=4C00,PATH=((CSS(0),4C)),UNITADD=((00,008)), * CUADD=5,UNIT=FCTC Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM

Re: ISPF Action Bar Menus

2007-12-26 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
Your recall correctly, one way is SET, INTERFACE then Activate Action Bars Y/N. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Rowe Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2007 7:47 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: ISPF

Re: FICON vs ESCON CTC's

2007-12-20 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
From a management perspective FICON is simpler if your configuration requires numerous pairs of ESCON channels to get around ESCON limits (i.e., implementing interesting candidate lists to avoid message CBDG089I) and not to mention allowing you the flexibility to implement a true any-to-any scheme

Re: Defining alternate path to a tape drive

2007-09-13 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
I don't know the specifics of your tape drive. Are there two ports? If so your IOCP looks good to me. Depending on your hardware this might also be an option: CNTLUNIT CUNUMBR=7100,PATH=(50,54),UNITADD=((00,016)), LINK=(87,97),CUADD=0,UNIT=3490 IODEVICE ADDRESS=(7100,016),UNITADD=00,CUNUMBR=

Re: Using gskkyman to utilize a real CA

2007-09-11 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
Double check the certificate and key data base path you are specifying. Are you able to display the certificate with gskkyman? If so, open your key data base, check what labels are already in use and try the import again. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion

Re: Dynamically Disabling ISV Products

2007-06-27 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
I don't believe SEA's PDSFAST has been mentioned. It's NPDSFAST. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Schwartz Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2007 7:13 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Dynamically Disabling ISV

Re: problem with TSO receive

2007-06-20 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
It appears you are mixing TRANSMIT operands with the RECEIVE command, but I don't believe omitting the operands will change your outcome. Based on your error message does the output from the MVS Command D IKJTSO,TRANSREC and JES2 Command D MASDEF,XCFGRPNM agree? Regards, Kevin -Original

Re: problem with TSO receive

2007-06-20 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
I apologize for any confusion. I didn't want to assume the CONCHAR so I prefaced it with JES2 Command instead. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 9:02 AM To:

Re: TSO LOGON Issue (resend with subject)

2007-06-05 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
Just a guess... Determine the variable in question then remove it via ISPEXEC VERASE. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George, William (DHS-ITSD) Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 2:26 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU

Re: VTAM question (***)

2007-05-23 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
I don't mean to detract from Debbie's problem, but in case there is merit... Q: Does the effect you are seeing apply only when using the ISPF Productivity Toll (IPT)? A: No. No prior to OA20772 the problem could be duplicated with and without IPT. Q: APAR OA20772 applies only to users of IPT?

Re: VTAM question (***)

2007-05-21 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
Going from z/OS 1.6 to 1.8 I have noticed similar behavior. Is it more pronounced on terminals such as Mod 3 (32X80) versus Mod 5 (27X132)? If you use IPT I found some relief with OA20772. Otherwise I opened TSO and ISPF ETRs to no avail and still have a VTAM ETR outstanding. Regards, Kevin

Re: IPLINFO Question

2007-05-21 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
You could look at the user directory for the primary address space size, but this can change-#CP DEFINE STORAGE size. From the guest representing your system #CP QUERY VIRTUAL STORAGE or from another guest #CP INDICATE USER userid. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe

Re: Shared ICP between 2 SYSPLEXES

2007-05-16 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
If you have peer mode capable links you could certainly do what you propose, but it would not be adhering to high availability connectivity design. It really depends on you comfort level, your CF structures, if you're exploiting system-managed CF structure duplexing, etc., but you might be able

Re: 359S vs 3590 (HCD)

2007-05-02 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
This is not anything I have ever seen in HCD. I am not familiar with a true 3590, but it sounds more like the setup of the drives themselves to me. For example I know an STK 9840 drive can be setup to emulate a 3490E, 3590, etc. Does the DEVSERV QTAPE command display anything interesting?

Re: Deleting console UCB's

2007-04-19 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
Offhand all I can think of is IEARELCN, but that does not sound like your problem. What is the specific message? Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hal Merritt Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 9:35 AM To:

Re: ISPF not productive

2007-03-28 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
I don't know if this is much news, but WebSphere Host On-Demand Version 10 has Mouse wheel support for Java 2 JVM 1.4 and higher clients... http://www-304.ibm.com/jct03002c/software/webservers/hostondemand/featur esv10.html Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe

Re: Removing unused 3286 from IODF

2007-01-17 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
I'm not certain about z890/z990 and beyond, but if the device does not support dynamic capability it certainly appears a power-on reset will be necessary. Regards, Kevin -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access

Re: Dynamically Activate additional CUs on Shark

2007-01-05 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
Except for older CF stuff like TYPE=CFR, adding/deleting partitions and devices not defined with the dynamic feature I don't recall having to perform many PORs... Paths to the control unit should be unique. See CUADD, etc. What do your CNTLUNIT and IODEVICE statements look like? What is the

Re: Setting Slip Traps with MSGID

2006-12-20 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
If you have multiple systems, was the SLIP SET issued on the appropriate system(s)? Regards Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2006 5:31 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject:

Re: HCD EDT's Generics

2006-12-19 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
I don't believe generics are that flexible. As already mentioned I believe you want to use esoterics. For example, I use two esoterics to differentiate between my Sun StorageTek 9840 A and B drives which are all part of my 3590-1 generic device group. Regards, Kevin -Original Message-

Re: All Boxed Up

2006-11-09 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
...varied with various forms of vary... Including VARY device(s),ONLINE,UNCOND? Regards, Kevin -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN

Re: LOOKAT

2006-11-02 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/eserver/zseries/zos/bkserv/lookat/ Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 2:13 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: LOOKAT I'm having a bad

Re: HCD problem with CFR-CFS pair

2006-08-24 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
I don't know what hardware you have available... If you have peer mode capability you need to use ICP for the channel path type otherwise for compatibility mode if I recall correctly you need to use ICR/ICS. Unless you want to override the values the control unit and device numbers are suggested

Re: Help With 2074

2006-07-12 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
I do not understand the differences between your IOCDS and IODF. Could you build the IOCP input data set (HCD 2.3) for the 2064-215 in question and resubmit the pertinent parts? Otherwise in reviewing just the aspects of device 398 it appears the following should be MODEL=X: TUBE380 IODEVICE

Re: GTF Woes

2006-06-13 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
It looks good to me. Perhaps there is something wrong with your SYS1.GTFTRACE. Do you get the same results allocating a new data set? Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase, John Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006

Re: Console Names

2006-05-25 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
...except for the system console. From MVS Initialization and Tuning Reference (SA22-7592-10): Summary of changes for SA22-7592-06 z/OS Version 1 Release 4 as updated December 2003 CONSOLxx is changed to reflect the requirement that all consoles be named, except for the system console.

Re: HMC : Dynamic I/O

2006-05-10 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
I believe the I/O configuration display command mentioned should be D IOS,CONFIG(HSA). Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL Sent: Tuesday, May 09, 2006 5:00 PM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: HMC :

Re: HMC : Dynamic I/O

2006-05-10 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
It really depends on how big the IOCDS is, how much is being reserved for dynamic expansion, etc. The Processor Resource/Systems Manager Planning Guide and Support Element Operations Guide have good information on this. As mentioned previously the support element has an HSA Estimation Tool. As

Re: SYS1.PARMLIB(PROG00) vs. RACF DSMON Report

2006-05-02 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
In regards to ... not listed in the SYS1.PARMLIB(PROG00)... Are you sure you're looking at the appropriate PROGxx member(s) of parmlib as specified by the PROG parameter in IEASYSxx and/or are you sure you're looking at the entire parmlib concatenation as specified by the PARMLIB statement(s) in

Re: Securing consoles

2006-05-02 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
Additionally, depending on the current authority of the console in question have you taken a look at the other possibilities of the AUTH parameter within the CONSOLE statement? Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of

Re: Help : FTP A PDS

2006-05-02 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
Something like this should get you started: //INPUTDD * ip address user password cd etc. ascii etc. mput 'xxx.yyy.zzz(*)' quit /* Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Dawes Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2006 3:34

Re: Adding LPARs without POR

2006-04-25 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
I believe what you're referring to, adding LPARs dynamically, began with the z890/z990 and z/OS 1.6. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hal Merritt Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 9:59 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU

Re: LOADxx IEASYM parms

2006-04-24 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
I would have to try it to be sure, but I don't believe it matters in regards to your concern for totally messing things up. If IEASYMXY is specified in LOADxx, but not present in parmlib I would expect the following: IEA013E ERROR DETECTED PROCESSING IEASYMxx:... IEA011A RESPECIFY ENTIRE

Re: Assigning Device Numbers to an Esoteric

2006-04-20 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
It can be done when the devices are added if the esoteric(s) is(are) defined. Following the addition on the Define Device to Operating System Configuration panel select the appropriate Config. On the Actions on selected operating systems popup Select (connect, change). Go past the Define Device

Re: DASD Only Plex

2006-04-17 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
If the CHPIDs are shared, except for CTC CUs and Devices, why add new CUs and Devices? Via the HCD panels you should be able to get by with the following: Define, modify, or view configuration data, Processors, Work with partitions, Add, Enter Partition name, etc. and Update CHPID Access and

Re: DASD Only Plex

2006-04-14 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
I do not really understand the question, but it sounds like the new system should have identical access to the channels, etc. I would research the Channel Path Access/Candidate Lists for any problems. You should be able to obtain a Channel Path Summary Report by selecting the following from the

Re: IODF and IOCDS out of sync

2006-04-04 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
Regarding what's different about the IPL process... Nothing if you still had the IODF that corresponds to the IOCDS. To make a change the hardware and software need to be in sync. The active IODF per D IOS,CONFIG is what you are running with. Regards, Kevin

Re: Systems Programmer Levels Justification

2006-03-29 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
This might be a worthwhile visit: http://www.bls.gov/oco/home.htm. Specifically: http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos110.htm. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Desi de la Garza Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 12:43 PM To:

Re: Problem copying VM volumes under z/OS

2006-03-20 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
Should your COPY have PURGE? At this time I don't have access to any DASD to try what you're doing, but the following using tape works for me: //SYSINDD * DUMP TRKS(0,0,3338,14) - INDDNAME(DISKIN) - OUTDDNAME(TAPEOUT) - CPVOL - ADMIN //SYSINDD * RESTORE

Re: 64-bit question

2006-03-13 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
Regarding an accidental CPC deactivate... If you deactivate a CPC with active systems you should be receiving a warning message identifying active systems by name along with a message stating the action being performed is disruptive before you can proceed. Regarding accidental object

Re: Need help with msg IEE114I

2006-03-07 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
Attached transaction programs. Regards, Kevin -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at

Re: CF usage at DR location

2006-03-06 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
Though not recovering in the exact manner you are planning your PREFLIST proposal looks good to me. With a PREFLIST consisting of ICFXXA, ICFXXB and ICFXXD here are some syslog messages for your review. ICFXXD does not exist at home. At home: IXC517I SYSTEM ABLE TO USE COUPLING

Re: SMPE Question

2006-03-01 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
By PTF. For example, APAR PQ92344 for FMID EDU1H01 is UQ91568. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Howard Rifkind Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 10:52 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: SMPE Question I'm

Re: Changing an IODF in batch

2006-02-27 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
Is it possible for you to create another LOADxx member for use at disaster recovery and IPL accordingly? If you're recovering under z/VM I don't believe dynamic i/o changes will be permitted. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: Defining CFP in HCD

2006-02-22 Thread Neubert, Kevin (DIS)
I've included them in mine without any problems. The only downside I can think of offhand would be if you were adding another ICF to CPUH as only one ICF per CFP is allowed in the access list. Regards, Kevin -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL