In
d7d6aecb6747954693308258067007801b040d3...@exchange.calpers.ca.gov,
on 07/19/2011
at 05:59 PM, Starr, Alan alan_st...@calpers.ca.gov said:
I wonder how the initiator manages to invoke PGM=apfpgm
(APF-authorized) and then PGM=nonapf (not APF-authorized) for a
subsequent step or job.
The
Hi Alan,
It is possible that looking at the source code of some programs I wrote
recently to allow 3,000 character parameter fields, and to create
control cars with Symbolic Parameters inserted might be of interest.
The LONGPARM program uses the same ATTACH that the next generation of
JCL
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:59:07 -0700 Starr, Alan alan_st...@calpers.ca.gov
wrote:
:The subject of an APF-authorized program invoking a program that runs
non-APF-authorized has been discussed many times here. The admonishment not to
turn JSCBAUTH on, after having turned it off, has been repeated
--snip---
Please forgive me ... but I simply could not resist.
Do porcupines do 'it' ?? ... really ??.
---unsnip-
YES With great care!! :-)
Rick
; it is also irrelevant
to the initiator.
Thanks to those who provided input.
Alan
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Starr, Alan
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 5:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: APF and the initiator
Hi List,
The subject of an APF-authorized program invoking a program that runs
non-APF-authorized has been discussed many times here. The admonishment not to
turn JSCBAUTH on, after having turned it off, has been repeated many times.
I wonder how the initiator manages to invoke PGM=apfpgm
On 19 July 2011 20:59, Starr, Alan alan_st...@calpers.ca.gov wrote:
The subject of an APF-authorized program invoking a program that runs
non-APF-authorized has been discussed many times here. The admonishment not
to turn JSCBAUTH on, after having turned it off, has been repeated many times.
Subject: Re: APF and the initiator (IEFIIC)
On 19 July 2011 20:59, Starr, Alan alan_st...@calpers.ca.gov wrote:
The subject of an APF-authorized program invoking a program that runs
non-APF-authorized has been discussed many times here. The admonishment not
to turn JSCBAUTH on, after having
On Tue, 2011-07-19 at 17:59 -0700, Starr, Alan wrote:
Hi List,
The subject of an APF-authorized program invoking a program that runs
non-APF-authorized has been discussed many times here. The admonishment not
to turn JSCBAUTH on, after having turned it off, has been repeated many times.
On 7/19/2011 5:59 PM, Starr, Alan wrote:
I wonder how the initiator manages to invoke PGM=apfpgm (APF-authorized) and
then PGM=nonapf (not APF-authorized) for a subsequent step or job. Does it, for
example, turn on JSCBAUTH in the ATTACHed program's (job step) JSCB? Does
anybody know the
10 matches
Mail list logo
