On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 10:20:35 -0400, Richards, Robert B.
robert.richa...@opm.gov wrote:
Does anyone have any experience or considerations with having a higher
CF Level at your primary site than at the disaster recovery site? Are
there any issues I should be aware of?
As others have given
Art,
Thank you for the pointer to that link. It is in my favorites now.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Arthur Gutowski
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 10:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CF Level Considerations
Does anyone have any experience or considerations with having a higher
CF Level at your primary site than at the disaster recovery site? Are
there any issues I should be aware of?
Due to implementing STP here, we are fairly current and may be at a
higher level than our DR provider has
@bama.ua.edu
Subject: CF Level Considerations at DR
Does anyone have any experience or considerations with having a higher
CF Level at your primary site than at the disaster recovery site? Are
there any issues I should be aware of?
Due to implementing STP here, we are fairly current and may
Thanks for that heads-up, Otto.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Schumacher, Otto
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 10:30 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: CF Level Considerations at DR
Depending on the level we
AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: CF Level Considerations at DR
Does anyone have any experience or considerations with having a higher
CF Level at your primary site than at the disaster recovery site? Are
there any issues I should be aware of?
Due to implementing STP here, we are fairly
6 matches
Mail list logo
