-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Clark Morris
On 1 May 2009 07:52:30 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Phil Sidler
On Fri, 1 May 2009 08:38:59 -0500,
On 1 May 2009 07:52:30 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Phil Sidler
On Fri, 1 May 2009 08:38:59 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
Thanks for pointing out the benefit of TRUNC(OPT) to me.
But then there's
.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Rick Arellanes
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 12:29 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Enterprise COBOL code generation question
On Fri, 1 May 2009 08:38:59 -0500, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com
wrote
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Farley, Peter x23353
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Clark Morris
Snipped
On 30 Apr 2009 13:00:02 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
Try TRUNC(OPT). Trunc
On Fri, 1 May 2009 08:38:59 -0500, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com wrote:
Thanks for pointing out the benefit of TRUNC(OPT) to me.
But then there's this in the Notes for TRUNC in the Installation
Customization Guide:
2. TRUNC=BIN is the recommended option when interfacing with other
products
On 1 May 2009 06:41:19 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Farley, Peter x23353
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Clark Morris
Snipped
On 30 Apr 2009 13:00:02
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 9:39 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Enterprise COBOL code generation question
Snipped
But then there's this in the Notes for TRUNC
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Phil Sidler
On Fri, 1 May 2009 08:38:59 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
Thanks for pointing out the benefit of TRUNC(OPT) to me.
But then there's this in the Notes for TRUNC in the Installation
Customization Guide:
So, we're stuck with TRUNC(BIN) in CICS, where arguably we'd want the
best performance. :-(
Are you implying that CPU is your primary performance concern?
I've been a performance/capacity analys for almost 30 years, and rarely has CPU
been the problem.
IO paging (which should be rare) have
On Fri, 1 May 2009 08:38:59 -0500, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Farley, Peter x23353
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Clark Morris
Snipped
On 30 Apr 2009
...@eds.com
We deliver on our commitments
so you can deliver on yours.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Rick Arellanes
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 12:29 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Enterprise COBOL code generation
...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Rick Arellanes
Sent: Friday, May 01, 2009 12:29 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Enterprise COBOL code generation question
On Fri, 1 May 2009 08:38:59 -0500, Chase, John jch...@ussco.com
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
I will defer to Rick Arellanes (who has already replied) on this (and most
performance questions). HOWEVER, I do want to re-iterate that *if*
performance is of concern to you, the best general rule is to compile with
TRUNC(OPT)
and use
COMP-5
for specific fields that MAY have values larger
I am failing to understand something about the code generation that the
Enterprise COBOL compiler (V3.4.1) performs. For a WORKING-STORAGE
variable defined like this:
77 WORK-WORD9 PIC S9(09) BINARY.
with TRUNC(BIN) and OPTIMIZE(STD) in effect, this IF statement:
IF (WORK-WORD9 -1)
Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
I am failing to understand something about the code generation that the
Enterprise COBOL compiler (V3.4.1) performs. For a WORKING-STORAGE
variable defined like this:
77 WORK-WORD9 PIC S9(09) BINARY.
with TRUNC(BIN) and OPTIMIZE(STD) in effect, this IF
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Steve Comstock
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 3:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Enterprise COBOL code generation question
Snipped
Peter,
I can't speak with authority
On 30 Apr 2009 13:00:02 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Steve Comstock
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 3:30 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Enterprise COBOL code
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Clark Morris
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2009 7:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Enterprise COBOL code generation question
Snipped
On 30 Apr 2009 13:00:02 -0700
18 matches
Mail list logo
