On Thu, 31 May 2012 19:31:04 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote:
Something has to specify the UNIT. Does LIKE establish the
UNIT but not the VOL? Strange.
LIKE establishes neither; UNIT comes from the system default
unit, usually SYSALLDA; VOL is chosen from available storage
volumes.
Humph! I
In 4fc7e1b0.6070...@trainersfriend.com, on 05/31/2012
at 03:25 PM, Steve Comstock st...@trainersfriend.com said:
I'm finding an unexpected allocation situation
that maybe someone can explain.
Are all of your datasets supposed to be SMS managed? If so, there is
an ACS issue. If not, it has
On Thu, 31 May 2012 15:25:04 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote:
I run a job that creates a new data set using
this DD statement:
//NEWMASTDD DISP=(NEW,CATLG),DSN=SYSUID..WORK.NEW.ZINPUTA,
// LIKE=STNT329.TRAIN.ZINPUTA
Job runs fine and creates the new file.
Is the data set SMS managed?
Washington State University
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Tom Marchant
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2012 2:38 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Allocation mystery
On Thu, 31 May 2012 15:25:04 -0600, Steve Comstock
On 5/31/2012 5:26 PM, Steve Comstock wrote:
I'm finding an unexpected allocation situation
that maybe someone can explain.
I run a job that creates a new data set using
this DD statement:
//NEWMAST DD DISP=(NEW,CATLG),DSN=SYSUID..WORK.NEW.ZINPUTA,
// LIKE=STNT329.TRAIN.ZINPUTA
Job runs fine
On Thu, 31 May 2012 21:45:54 +, Gibney, Dave wrote:
There is a parmlib option to abend NOT CATLG 2. I recommend using it.
Would this cause the ABEND at the beginning or at the end of the job step?
The latter would be suboptimal.
IMO, SMS should be set up for all allocations and the
On 5/31/2012 4:59 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Thu, 31 May 2012 21:45:54 +, Gibney, Dave wrote:
There is a parmlib option to abend NOT CATLG 2. I recommend using it.
Would this cause the ABEND at the beginning or at the end of the job step?
The latter would be suboptimal.
IMO, SMS
On 5/31/2012 4:13 PM, Thomas Conley wrote:
On 5/31/2012 5:26 PM, Steve Comstock wrote:
I'm finding an unexpected allocation situation
that maybe someone can explain.
I run a job that creates a new data set using
this DD statement:
//NEWMAST DD DISP=(NEW,CATLG),DSN=SYSUID..WORK.NEW.ZINPUTA,
//
8 matches
Mail list logo