Even if SYSSTATE ARCHLVL=2?
It has code to recognize 64 bit, but does not use the SYSALVL to use OILH
instead of O? How annoying!
--
Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package
+1 for DEFERW. But understand it defers the writes :-) ...
Once took a job down from 2M EXCPs to 0.5M with BLSR and then on down to
850 by adding DEFERW. 500 Control Intervals or so in the VSAM data set all
the I/O was to.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
Mainframe Performance Consultant,
So, your files are still in ASCII on z/OS? You may need Gil to help with
that :-)
Try unwinding the tarball into EBCDIC files:
pax -o from=iso8859-1 -rzvf openssl-1.0.1.tar.gz
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Shaffer, Terri E
terri.e.shaf...@jpmchase.com wrote:
Sorry about that, here is
Be very cautious using DEFERW with BLSR unless you already have a good backup
of the KSDS immediately before the program starts. Recovery after a crash
(program or system) will require a restore of the file, since DEFERW with a
crash can leave the KSDS corrupted and sometimes unreadable, in
Hi Kirk,
Okay that changed the world for the better, I now have the file in the right
format. Onto the next issue now..
W012108:SDEV(DEV):/u/w012108/temp/openssl-1.0.1 ./config --prefix=/u/w012108/o
penssl --openssldir=/u/w012108/openssl $MAKE
Operating
It looked good when I sent it!
Let me try this...
Before BLSR:
- -TIMINGS
(MINS.)-- -PAGING COUNTS
-STEPNAME PROCSTEP RC EXCP CONN TCB SRB CLOCK
SERV WORKLOAD PAGE SWAP VIO SWAPS
We have an application like this, that is multiple record types in the
same KSDS. We found that if we had a FD for the type '4' records and a FD
for the type '5' records (that is two DDs pointing to the same file), that
each kept a separate sequence set in storage and it ran faster. You might
That was our original thought, but since we have to open it as I-O it wouldn't
work for us. Well, not without shareoptions 4.
Thanks!
Frank
- Original Message -
From: Chip Grantham cgrant...@ameritas.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, April 4, 2012 9:37 AM
Hello everybody,
I have the NFS server on z/os LPAR B, and NFS client on z/os LPAR A
On the server side, I export some MVS files and a unix directory :
*/mvs/udmz.a500.testnfsnosaf -access=192.168.1.2,ro *
*/hfs/u/nfstestnosaf -access=192.168.1.2,ro *
On the client side, I can mount
Tested with DEFERW=YES (that is the proper syntax, by the way. Commas are
optional.)
It didn't gain me much, as I am only updating 32 of 61459 records, so I'm not
going to worry about it at this time.
With BLSR DEFERW=YES:
CSR020I BUFSI=1024, BUFSD=20480, BUFNI=10, BUFND=256, HBUFNI=0,
Alan,
I write sockets all the time the sys1.samplib examples are excellent and work
with just a tiny bit of tweaking..
Hth
Regards,
Sent from my iPad
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
www.identityforge.com
On Apr 4, 2012, at 12:35 AM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com wrote:
On Tue, 3
Micheal,
Without seeing your code, it's not really possible to know what your real
problem(s) is(are). The scenario you outlined seems reasonable, but that's
because it doesn't include sufficient detail to say otherwise.
I think you may be placing too much importance on port numbers and
All,
I am considering the usage of IBM's SCLM to manage software products.
Since we are 'pure' development ,I thought we might be a good candidate for the
Product. I have downloaded the IBM Redbook and i am reviewing it.
My question is does anyone have exposure to SCLM and are there any
Regarding the Client id Structure is its value important or as long as The
Clientid of the GiveSocket matches the takesocket I should be OK
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Scott Ford
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012
G'day mates,
I would like to know if anyone has been successful in using a
COBOL program to create a report that contains a UPC based '3 of 9' barcode. I
am using COBOL on a MVS system and sending the print data to RMDS and Infopac
where AFP is used to define the barcode
Good Luck.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf
Of Scott Ford
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 1:10 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Sclm
All,
I am considering the usage of IBM's SCLM to manage software products.
Since we are
Should work fine as long as the printer has a 3 of 9 barcode font and you
select that font.
I print from a PC to a locally attached printer with a 3 of 9 barcode font
and the automated tape library reads them.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Hi Scott,
We converted from CA Endevor to SCLM back in July 2011. After the initial
learning, about a month or two, we have not seen any problems.
If this is your first source control system there will be a large learning
curve. However, in the end you will have less errors more free time to
We use the base (free) product for source only - we never could figure out how
to do C compiles.
I'd suggest the full product and some expert help in getting you going.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Scott Ford
We've been using it for two or three years. Our only issue is that it requires
PDSEs, which, until last month, broke frequently.
Tom
- Original Message -
From: Hal Merritt [mailto:hmerr...@jackhenry.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 01:56 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
You might want to join the SCLM newsgroup.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ford scott_j_f...@yahoo.com
Sent: Apr 4, 2012 10:10 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Sclm
All,
I am considering the usage of IBM's SCLM to manage software products.
Since we are 'pure' development
Thanks for reminding me!
Yes - we saw this trying to use SCLM on two LPAR's. Most all the issues went
away when we channeled everyone to one LPAR.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Tom Harper
Sent: Wednesday, April
On 04/04/2012 10:37 AM, Chip Grantham wrote:
We have an application like this, that is multiple record types in the
same KSDS. We found that if we had a FD for the type '4' records and a FD
for the type '5' records (that is two DDs pointing to the same file), that
each kept a separate sequence
Tom Harper wrote: Our only issue is that it requires PDSEs, which, until last
month, broke frequently.
I was actually trying to break a PDSE last week, so that I could get an example
of the IEBPDSE utility run against a hosed PDSE, and I couldn't seem to break
one. I have two sysplexes so I
We have done it. In the Cobol program we set up a data definition like;
01 WSP1-PRINT-LINE-1.
12 WSP1-CC PIC X VALUE '1'.
12 WSP1-BARCODE-INV-NO.
16 FILLER
On 4 April 2012 13:13, Goldsby, Gary gary.gold...@fredmeyer.com wrote:
G'day mates,
I would like to know if anyone has been successful in using a
COBOL program to create a report that contains a UPC based '3 of 9' barcode.
I am using COBOL on a MVS system and sending the print
On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 12:37:12 -0400 Mark Brooks mabr...@us.ibm.com wrote:
:Hi,
: The recovery for the various XCF stubs that call the application exit
:routines will in general always retry if permitted to do so. If you can
:get your exit routine to fail in a way that causes the system to
We use the h*ll out of SCLM. Unfortunately I'm no expert on it, but we
do have a very good one in-house.
We even used it for distributed stuff (java, etc.) w/ BREEZE CLOUD9
and our change control system (for things besides software updates).
We do have a C language environment on the
Not to suggest YOU should've done this but you can get useful statistics
out of SMF 62 and 64 that would've told you how much write activity you
had - and a lot else besides.
Cheers, Martin
Martin Packer,
Mainframe Performance Consultant, zChampion
Worldwide Banking Center of Excellence, IBM
Thanks one and all. We run on several z/Pdt systems, which are great and mainly
remote.
So I am always looking to make my job, sysprog, developer and qa'er easier.
Your input did just thank and I am appreciate of that...
Sent from my iPad
Scott Ford
Senior Systems Engineer
www.identityforge.com
I possibly could if I had the slightest idea how to do that. Is that something
an applications developer might have access to, or only a sysprog?
Thanks,
Frank
- Original Message -
From: Martin Packer martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, April 4,
VSAM keeps up with this stuff too. Wouldn't hurt to do a reorg every once
in blue moon too!
In a message dated 4/4/2012 6:12:16 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com writes:
out of SMF 62 and 64 that would've told you how much write activity you
had - and a lot else
At 16:33 -0700 on 04/03/2012, Frank Swarbrick wrote about Re: VSAM
help wanted for random reads:
The idea of putting the record type at the end rather than the
beginning is an interesting idea.Ý Unless there's some way of doing
that without having to change any programs I don't think we'd
33 matches
Mail list logo
