-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
[ snip ]
I had (mis)understood it to mean to bet in such manner as to
provide one's opponent with deliberately misleading information.
But:
Optimal bluffing also requires that the bluffs
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Scott Fagen
[ snip ]
1) Add your exit routine for the IEFJFRQ exit, specifying POS=FIRST.
2) Add an exit routine for the CSVDYNEX exit point. Watch
for instances of programs attempting to install _their_ exit
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jon Brock
I know some people think that C is the best programming language
in
history, but this is one reason --
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Hal Merritt
Agreed. But it does. There is a proposed stepwise procedure where
you
first change the name to '*', then
Hi, All,
Getting ready to transition from SADMP from/to tape to doing it
from/to DASD. After reading the SADUMP generation doc in z/OS 1.7 MVS
Diagnosis: Tools and Service Aids, it's still not clear whether the
residence volume for the SADUMP program should be a standalone
volume, or can be
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim Marshall
But z/VM costs real money. LPAR is free.
-jc-
Indeed both above are true statements. z/VM will cost about
$21K to give you many, many more Virtual Servers than the
available number of
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
On 12 Jan 2007 23:08:13 -0800, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
Assuming that everyone on the planet has exactly one
middle initial.
I remember a case where the program needed to accept NMI
(for No
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Scott Barry
Cross-post.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Barry
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Hello,
Regarding this reported symptom condition, CA now
acknowledges that the CICS/CMF transaction
record's
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Alan Schwartz
Perhaps I can save someone an outage. We ipled a lot of
preventative maintenance in our production lpars Sunday.
This morning we started getting severe enqueue conflicts for
a number of catalogs.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bill Seubert
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:26:44 -0800, Charles Mills
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pet peeve. Saying mainframes versus servers is like saying
Fords versus
cars. A mainframe typically IS a server (often
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Alan C. Field
We have a CICS program that builds the parameter list and
then issues the CA-7 SVC to Demand jobs.
This worked on CA-7 Rel 3.3,
We have just tried (and had to fall back) to upgrade to CA-7
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Rifkind
I understand that IBM support is being discontinued as of 2/2007.
Would anyone know if that would be the beginning of the month
or end of the month?
Last EOS date I saw published was March 31,
Hi, All,
During acceptance testing of z/OS 1.7 one of our testers said the
following:
We used to be able to say RESTART=PSTEP025 or whatever
step. I had to change that to RESTART=STEP001.PSTEP025
This is consistent with the JCL Reference manual. The old release on
which the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007 10:43:23 +1000, Shane Ginnane
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If this is in relation to the changes to /var and /etc in z/OS 1.7,
you'll have to manually deal with that. There's some
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Richard Tsujimoto
I was looking at the info that could be retrieved using the
Catalog Search Interface (CSI) and noticed that there wasn't
a bit setting that can be tested to see if the VSAM data set
is an ESDS
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jon Brock
Yeah, Computerworld reported that yesterday:
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArt
icleBasicarticleId=9008842
One of the ODF developers said, From now on we should take
the
Hi, All,
Just rolling out z/OS 1.7 and are looking to modernize some things,
including TSO storage allocations and limits. Currently using
XA-period limitations like REGION=6144K in the logon proc,
MAXSIZE=6144 in the TSO segment of the users' RACF profiles, etc.
What would be reasonable limits
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Schmidt
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 13:30:55 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom
Schmidt On Fri,
26 Jan 2007 10:40:55 -0600, Chase, John
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim Mulder
[ snip ]
If you are on z/OS 1.7 or higher, you can tell if the system
was quiesced for a particular dump using IPCS:
VERBX IEAVTSFS
System reset dispatchable 09/17/2042 23:53:47.370496
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Comstock
Jim Mulder wrote:
[snip]
No matter how many times I proofread before posting, I still can't
seem to find all the typos.
When we teach a class, we tell the students we will pay a
nickel
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim Mulder
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU wrote on
01/29/2007 09:08:47 AM:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim Mulder
[ snip ]
If
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jim McAlpine
Yes thanks, I'm aware of that but I'm also thinking that we
may need to switch the runtime options back again after
return from the Java program.
This is a long running batch job which sits and
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Brigitte Pruett
I have been assigned the task to research debug tool for our
shop. We are mostly an LE COBOL shop and do batch and CICS
processing equaly. I reviewed IBM debug tool, xpediter,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Frank Yaeger
[ snip ]
I have a question for you (or anyone else on the list if they
can shed some light on it) about something I'm curious about.
I noticed you said DFHSORT instead of DFSORT (Data
Facility
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Hal Merritt
[ snip ]
But your unenviable, thankless, daunting task could be to
inform management that they made a very expensive mistake.
That is *never* a good career move. Keep that in mind as you
raise
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Charles Mills
So many MVS utilities have vernacular names that consist of a
3-letter prefix followed by a functional name, they just seem
to roll off the tongue that way: I-E-B-copy, I-E-H-program,
I-E-B-gener,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Bruce Black
Perhaps some of us should move to India, to be sure that
there are at least a few competent z/OS people there
Would Australia be close enough? :-)
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
snip---
The short answer is Yes, you can do it. FICON is so fast that
you should not have trouble with 12 drives--assuming that
distance is not a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Staller, Allan
snip
I use search shelf. Don't need to know which book.
/snip
All of my site searches turnd up the original (non-working)
URL's for lookat and booksrv
The following URLs work for me:
z/OS
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Chris Mason
John
So we have a fancy new name for antediluvian frequency
division multiplexing
(FDM) - or am I missing something?
From the provided URL for DWDM: DWDM works by combining and
transmitting
Hi, All,
Having a problem getting into the SHARE Requirements area with MS IE7
and Firefox from home (DSL connection). Whenever I click on the Enter
New Requirements 4.1 button I get an immediate (instantaneous) session
timeout along with a page instructing me to log in to SHARE
requirements.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Our service provider missed on a critcal PTF (cross memory
services), because it was bundled, in an APAR, with 13
others, of which some were PE'd.
That is their explanation.
Since (and I admit it) I
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Skip Robinson
No answers, but I forwarded John's note to SHARE HQ. Their IT
person will look into it.
Thanks. Likely I'll need to configure something in the CA eTrust
Internet Security package, since both
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Individual PTFs, APARs, USERMODs, etc. can be selectively applied.
That's what I thought.
But, they claim it's a lot of work to sift through the APAR
and pick out the non-PE'd (and their associated
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour
J.)
on 01/21/2007 at 11:01 AM, Chase, John said:
During acceptance testing of z/OS 1.7 one of our testers said the
following:
We used to be able to say RESTART=PSTEP025
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of R.S.
Jacky Bright wrote:
Hi,
I have 2 TSO Users (ABC and XYZ)
ABC has high level access privileges.
XYZ do not have any such access.
I am trying to submit 1 job from XYZ userid which require
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jason Gately
For those of you not subscribed to the Red Alert service
Refer to:
https://www14.software.ibm.com/webapp/set2/sas/f/redAlerts/home.html
Yup Hit us two days after rolling out z/OS 1.7 in the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shane Ginnane
Had to happen I suppose - zIIP(s) as utility engines, rather than just
DB2 engines.
http://www3.ca.com/press/PressRelease.aspx?CID=99107
Hmmm Doesn't say one way or the other whether presence
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Craddock, Chris
[ snip ]
IBM says offload engines don't count for software MSUs and
the vendor community has a gentleman's agreement to follow
suit. As far as I know everyone is sticking by that.
The bottom
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
On 13 Feb 2007 10:49:55 -0800, pauls2272 wrote:
Or are you saying that mixed-case increases security
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Shane
On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 09:06 +, Phil Payne wrote:
http://www.isham-research.co.uk/T3Feb13.pdf
404 Phil ???.
The beaks got to you already ???.
It's visible from Chicago
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of J R
I can see it from Toronto!
Must have stopped snowing
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jeffrey Deaver
The temporary system has data that I cloned from the main system.
select only datasets with the changed flag set
Depending on the type of clone your temporary system was
created with, you may find
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Fred Hoffman
Greetings,
I know that this is not the racf-l list, however, can someone
tell me what parameter in racf controls the timeout for
ibmuser. I/we have an extremely large file we're working
with and
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
[ snip ]
The senior DBA is highly skilled.
I have no reason to distrust his statements.
Maybe I should dig a little?
Question everything. Especially if it sounds illogical.
-jc-
Hi, All,
I created an HFS with an allocation of 10 cylinders, to be mounted on
'/u' and contain only private user directory entries / mountpoints.
However, when I display the DSI from ISPF 3.4 using line command 'I', it
shows this:
Data Set Name . . . : OMVS.USER.DIRECT
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 09:40:35 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
Hi, All,
I created an HFS with an allocation of 10 cylinders, to be mounted on
'/u' and contain only private user directory entries
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Finnell
[ snip ]
The silver bullet would be a magic decoder ring on the HMC
that says this
can run and this can't. Doubt we'll see that anytime soon.
IFAPRDxx ?
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Doesn't anybody know what accountability is, anymore?
In the US it seems to be politically incorrect. Since we all are
products of our environments, it's obviously somebody else's fault
whenever we do
Hi, All,
Yesterday we rolled out z/OS 1.7 to a Production LPAR previously running
z/OS 1.5, and have noticed a change in the archiving of batch job output
in CA-View. With 1.5, all jcl-type output (JESMSGLG, JESJCL, JESYSMSG
together with SYSPRINT, SYSOUT, etc.) was archived in CA-View as a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 09:21:21 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
[ snip ]
We are at a loss to explain why this segregation of jcl stuff
into
separate CA-View members is occurring. We understand that z/OS
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tony Harminc
[ snip ]
Now as an ISV employee, I see many Fortune 500 companies that
have A-P departments who, as a matter of policy, push the
limits much further, and more often.
You could probably attribute
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
[ snip ]
Okay... another idea. Did someone change the JESLOG=NOSPIN
to SPIN for the execution class the job(s) ran in?
No; JESLOG= is not specified at all, and the manual says the default is
NOSPIN.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:56:39 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
[ snip ]
Okay... another idea. Did someone
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jon Brock
Yes, I would say it is. A dozen eggs, a dozen doughnuts, etc.
But those entities usually come in a single container, with no explicit
connection between the term dozen and the quantity 12.
Consider a box
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Harold Zbiegien
we have no problems, view 11.0 z/os 1.7 as of Jan 14 and we
migrated first to view 11.0 under z/os 1.4 then a month later to z/os
1.7
Just learned there may be another ISV product contributing to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jon Brock
We added Internet access just last year to our BRS contract
with IBM; software key access was one of the reasons.
Another reason was that it allowed me to access our home
system in case I was needed
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
snip
I, for one, have just about thrown in the towl with respect
to finding employment (either regular or contract) as
MVS/OS390/zOS product
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mullen, Patrick
Add CBC.SCLBDLL to your linklist.
Might not hurt to add these three to the linklist:
CBC.SCCNCMP
CBC.SCLBDLL
CBC.SCLBDLL2
We also have them APF-authorized. Java runs fine (FSVO fine); even
the
Since many of us were quick to complain
From: CICS List
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 1:53 PM
Since there was a lot of complaining about the IBMLink changes
that forced us to search in two different places, I thought
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
[ snip ]
Haven't heard from Mark Thomen in a while on this list.
Likewise Greg Dyck.
Perhaps they retired??
-jc-
--
For
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Tom Schmidt
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:06:08 -0600, Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Haven't heard from Mark Thomen in a while
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Support, DUNNIT
SYSTEMS LTD.
I posted this question on the FLEX-ES list and got back 1
reply, which included a suggestion to also ask for responses
here on IBM-MAIN.
For a bit of background, our applications
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Thompson, Steve
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steven Shore
I'm looking for information ( manuals, other resources) on
size limits on the mainframe Working on an
Background: Over the Thanksgiving holiday weekend (U.S.) we relocated
our datacenter. We moved the mainframes' DASD volumes via DFSMSdss DUMP
FULL at the old site, followed by RESTORE FULL at the new site. On the
day the DUMP FULL of every volume was taken, a TSO user had recalled a
migrated
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Betsy Jeffery
I've got a developer just starting to use JAVA 1.4 under USS
(z/OS 1.4 soon to be z/OS 1.7). I'm wondering what people
are using as a general rule for TSO initial region size for
JAVA developers.
Hi, All,
Reading thru the VSAM Demystified Redbook (Sept. 2003), I saw the
statement that (for batch, anyway) VSAM resource pools (i.e., control
blocks and buffers) _DEFAULT_ location is below the 16MB line.
Is that still true at z/OS 1.7?
TIA,
-jc-
_
Hi, All,
Reading thru the VSAM Demystified Redbook (Sept. 2003), I saw the
statement that (for batch, anyway) VSAM resource pools (i.e.,
control blocks and buffers) _DEFAULT_ location is below the 16MB line.
Is that still true at z/OS
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
--snip--
A good example of this is when politicians pass laws to do
something, whether or not that is a something that helps.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of David Day
The thing that has baffled me about outsourcing is how do
companies actually save money since now the outsourcer
includes in its costs marketing expenses and profits.
Salary for a programmer in
Hi, All,
A couple Sundays ago we deployed z/OS 1.7 to Production, and shortly
thereafter learned the hard way that we had omitted one loadlib from
the link list. We dynamically added the missing library, and I issued
an LLA REFRESH.
We also have a couple application loadlibs managed by LLA
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert Pelletier
Good Morning. This is what my page datasets look like:
TYPE FULL STAT DEV DATASET NAME
PLPA 77% OK 093B SYS1.PAGE.MVSDLB.PLPA
COMMON36% OK 0936
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ralph_Robison
Gil,
Just curious... Have you seen customer interest in the use
of RECEIVE FROMNETWORK for ISV software products? When it
was first introduced, we expected to eventually see customer
requests,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Charles Mills
Does anyone have an answer to the question what does IBM
mean by 'withdrawn from marketing'?
It generally means you can no longer order the product.
That said, everything is negotiable.
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Charles Mills
Dumb question: does IBM only distribute various fixes
electronically, or can you get an entire newly-ordered
product via the Internet?
I believe you can get any IBM software delivered
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Petersen, Jim
This has been an ongoing discussion in the company even before the
change in dates for DST. From what I am understanding, we are having
problems getting the Unix/AIX Servers to change time
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Thompson
If one needed a source control system that could be handled
via TSO, where could one find such?
I know about Panvalet, Endevor, SCLM, and Librarian. Are
there any others?
Changeman (Serena
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert Justice
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007 12:34:43 -0600, Bob_H wrote:
Might be why it is being removed.
Unfortunately however, they are getting rid of the version
(3270) that actually works and is the easiest to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
[ snip ]
BTW, is anyone else have problems with IBMLINK on the web? I
had to go into classic IBMLINK to pull up the APAR.
I just closed a PMR, updated another one and created a new one via the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jack Kelly
at least now when you call ibmlink, they (does sound like the
call went to
india) tell you it's down and customers won't be able to use
it. hopefully ibm will give us a rebate on our software
support
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert Justice
latest reponse from IBM:
Please be advised that we are currently undergoing scheduled
maintenance on some of our Web sites. Some abnormalities
are occurring due to this.
OK, let's all try to log on and see how fast we can crash it again.
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
-Original Message-
OK, let's all try to log on and see how fast we can crash it again.
Well, I got to the Sign in page, but I was there yesterday
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex R.
Must be sporadic, as I just logged in and updated an ETR.
Initial logon screen was slow compared to normal, but it went through.
My attempt has been clocking on the logon screen for about 20
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Gary Green
I came across this little ditty and chuckled a bit while
racking my brain trying to think of what type of mainframe
the article refers to.
I can't think of one, can you?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Finnell
In a message dated 3/12/2007 10:00:41 A.M. Central Daylight
Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm a little disappointed with Garmin. I'm sure all their
aircraft rated equipment was fixed.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
On 12 Mar 2007 08:28:56 -0700, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
Another US-Centric series of posts.
Only Canada and the US moved to DST, this weekend past.
And, only the US seems to think it mattered to the rest
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Eric N. Bielefeld
My Garmin GPS didn't reset the time either, but then it never
has. It doesn't take much to tap the clock icon and then tap
Daylight savings time.
Our hq building has several battery-powered
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Dave Kopischke
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 21:23:54 +1000, Shane wrote:
Any horror stories out there?
The rest of the world deals with this on a regular basis.
Enough of the Chicken Little syndrome from the yanks
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Clark Morris
The following is a reposting because of the possible
implications for other shops, The tax e-file application is
probably on a mainframe.
It has been down for over a week starting last Monday and
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Gould
[ snip ]
The second part of your interview is to figure out what type
of company you are interviewing with.
That should probably be in pre-interview preparation
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ray Mullins
Yes, but the DB2 on z/VM and z/VSE is not really DB2. :-)
There are 3 different code platforms for DB2 - I'm missing
some details, so someone please fill in the blanks...
- Non-mainframe
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of john gilmore
Chris Craddock writes:
I don't know that there's any particular rhyme or reason to the
numbering scheme.
and I should agree in general. There is, however, one ROT
that I have found very useful:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Thompson, Steve
SNIP
Some years ago with what today is called a SOHO, I used a
Seagate backup system (before it became Veritas) that wrote
to a tape cartridge where the cartridge unit was attached via
a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Knutson, Sam
[ snip ]
I think IBM is investing in z/VM but new work is mostly in
z/VM as a virtualization hypervisor not z/VM as an
application platform. I know that doesn't make old school VM
folk happy but
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Dave Salt
From: Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have written many applications, myself, for ISPF, and, I see no
need
for SPIFFY (or SIMPLIST -- especially since that one may have keys),
a
lot of it is too easy to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Richards.Bob
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 4:01 PM
No, and I just read it a few hours ago in an attempt to help
you. That DEFAULT behavior WAS NOT documented.
The subject DOC APAR closed today, 26 March.
I
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Barkow, Eileen
Actually, i am a bored CICS system's programmer ...
Delving into the intricacies of RACF can be an interesting and
constructive diversion when you're between CICS releases / projects.
:-)
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Steely
I have specified - I am using the SYS1.PARMLIB member and
those option are not defined. The parmlib member is correct
and does not have any offending options.
Other places to look:
For CICS, check
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Steely
Does any know when z/OS V1R9 will be available?
It should be available around the end of September, 2007.
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN
601 - 700 of 2492 matches
Mail list logo
