-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Gould
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 2:21 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Simpless way to prevent arbitary HLQ's
--- On Mon, 10/6/08, R.S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED
, Robert B.
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 7:59 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: [OT] Heart Surgery
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
10/12/2008
at 09:41 PM, Ed Gould [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Not really. I am do for Heart surgery in 3 weeks.
Ed,
I hope your operation
++
| Cobol Job Market Heating Up|
| from the dress-the-part-at-the-interview dept. |
| posted by timothy on Thursday October 23, @14:12 (Businesses)|
|
--- On Sat, 10/25/08, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SNIP
My $0.02:
Sometimes the A.H. companies do change their
rules. It is necessary to
explain them that you really need their product on some
LPAR, not all
box and - last but definitely
Sorry to break in but just wanted every one to know that the surgery has been
delayed. The doctors want to see if it can be treated by medicine instead if it
can't then surgery will happen.
Ed
--
For IBM-MAIN
--- On Wed, 11/12/08, Anton Britz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Anton Britz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Mainframe Jobs Considered Recession Proof
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Date: Wednesday, November 12, 2008, 5:24 PM
Hi,
Depends where and for who, I suppose ?
I am not so sure this
Ancient IBM Drive Rescues Apollo Moon Data
A Sydney computer society supplied the 1960s magnetic tape drive to retrieve
archives for moon development plans.
Tom Jowitt, Techworld.com
Saturday, November 15, 2008 02:06 PM PST
Valuable mission data gathered by NASA's Apollo missions to the moon 40
I was astounded to see that Google now claims to sort 6 petabytes in a few
hours. This is astounding. I bet Frank Yeager would be interested in this, I
know we could never come close to this in the mainframe world. I am in complete
awe of this. It is not clear exactly what they are sorting
Jim,
30+ years ago it was reasonably easy to be on top of all the announcements
(although in all honesty 2-3 times I went to SHARE and found out about a TSO
product of some sort. Yes it was easy despite that to keep up with products as
the changes were not that lets say major in each release.
Who says COBOL doesn't get tweaks?
Track this topic Print story Post comment
IBM Power/AIX machines get 64-bit support - finally
By Timothy Prickett Morgan • Get more from this author
Posted in Enterprise, 7th January 2009 20:23 GMT
Business whitepaper - Virtualization: the four key cost savings
My first thought would be to look at a logrec report that lists software errors
as well as hardware errors. There can be a lot of good info in there.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
--- On Fri, 1/9/09, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote:
From: R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl
Subject: Re: AIX gets 64 bit COBOL but still none for Z/os ...
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Friday, January 9, 2009, 7:56 AM
Is there any reason to have 64-bit
COBOL on z/OS ?
Of
SNIP--
I resemble being called Extinct,
under any title. There's still a
place for usDinos who prize nice tight code that
accomplishes the
required purpose. :-)
Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
---SNIP-
OK I
http://boycottnovell.com/2009/01/10/edgi-continued-dumping-vs-gnu/
How Microsoft Beats GNU/Linux In Schools
from the doing-battle-like-an-insider dept.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Yes thanks bit as others have mentions C isn't licensed at the installation and
the number of COBOL programmers who do know c is less than the number of
Assembler types out there. I have found that the senior COBOL types have over
the years have picked up assembler (little bits) as it is
I never produce a new master cat
with a new release install unless there is
some compelling reason to do so. My sandbox system
has its own master cat
so catalog compatibility can be checked there before
deploying elsewhere.
If you use indirect cataloging for the system resident data
Barbara,
I was looking at your reply and after a few hours this company rang a small
bell in my head. I couldn't get rid of and I started to vaguely remember a
product we got in house about 13 years ago. I think (I really could be off in
this) that it was a product from Europe and I couldn't
SNIP
Your request probably just went to Smith Bucklin, and while
they are
great at managing day to day admin stuff, they probably
aren't in a
position to even think about copyright issues.
Why not contact one of the board members; a fair number of
them
--- On Sat, 1/17/09, Jim Marshall jim.marsh...@opm.gov wrote:
SNIP--
As a footnote it does all present some interesting
challenges as far as Key
Management, exchanging files with our Windows/Unix/Linux
Brethren, and
espically the Translation
Barry:
Excellent response. I am somewhat perturbed though by IBM's response as being
OCO. IBM, I believe (for a large $$ donation) will give out certain non
disclosure items. Yet I am somewhat mystified as to why IBM needs to classify a
catalog record layout as OCO. We know of at least one
--- On Sat, 1/31/09, Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca wrote:
From: Ted MacNEIL eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Subject: Re: SYS1.UADS Format
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date: Saturday, January 31, 2009, 9:41 AM
I think you missed the
forest for the trees.
Do you have to editorialise, when somebody
--- On Fri, 1/30/09, Mark Zelden mark.zel...@zurichna.com wrote:
Date: Friday, January 30, 2009, 2:29 PM
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:18:25 -0600,
Lupher, Fred fred.lup...@nebraska.gov
wrote:
We are a long time Syncsort customer. Our
contract with them will be up
for renewal soon, so this is a
_SNIP__
(Frank Yaeger) wrote:
I have done a couple of conversions but that was
more than 10 years
ago so anything I write could be out of date so
take it for what its
worth.
Things have, of course, changed a lot for both products
in 10 years.
I never understand
---SNIP-.
Things have, of course, changed a lot for both products in
10 years.
I never understand why you think what happened 10 years ago
is relevant
today.
A lot of my experience stands. I still talk to other sysprogs and they are
fighting the same battles we
On Jul 20, 2007, at 5:28 PM, Ken Brick wrote:
I seem to recall that EASYTREV/PLUS come with a set of sample SMF
programs at one stage.
Ken,
I had access to EASYTREV ala 1979 and yes I did a lot of reporting
with SMF data. However I could not (successfully) access all the new
types of
that Ed Gould, alone among
contributors to this thread, did identify this problem.
John Gilmore
Ashland, MA 01721-1817
USA
John,
Thanks for the authoritative answer.
Ed
_
http://newlivehotmail.com
Just change one or two points
And it fits every Email group or list!
How many group members does it take
To change a lightbulb?
One to change the light bulb and to post
That the light bulb has been changed.
Fourteen to share similar experiences
Of changing light bulbs and how the light bulb
Go with a Mac Pro.
Mac's OSX OS is superior to win (anything) and you can also run XP.
Ed
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
On Jul 22, 2007, at 6:30 PM, Rich Smrcina wrote:
I wiped all that Vista nonsense off my new T60 and installed
Opensuse 10.2.
Ed Gould wrote:
Go with a Mac Pro.
Mac's OSX OS is superior to win (anything) and you can also run XP.
Ed
On Jul 23, 2007, at 12:33 PM, Howard Brazee wrote:
On 23 Jul 2007 08:20:21 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Todd Burch) wrote:
Ah, you are confusing a cross platform application with internet
browser
support. Cross platform should not imply cross browser. The app
I do cross
platform
On Jul 23, 2007, at 2:30 PM, Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Danielle Duarte
Are an expert with MVS Diagnostic tools? Love to program in
Assembler? Work with DFSMS family of products? Then CTG is
looking for you!
Computer Task
Today I was at another doctors office waiting for my appointment and
was surprised when I saw that Xephon was now apart of Z/Journal.
So now if you have a complaint you can complain to IBM (not sure if
this is good or not).
Also, in Pete Clarks column there is a interesting discussion about
On Jul 24, 2007, at 7:44 AM, McKown, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carroll, William
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 7:40 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Secure clist
Is there any way to secure certain clist
On Jul 24, 2007, at 8:10 PM, Lindy Mayfield wrote:
If it seems I'm picking nits then just ignore me. (-: But I've
been following this and trying to understand it and to be honest it
doesn't always make sense.
May I ask, do you mean that IBM is being a jerk about FLEX because
of the FSI
On Jul 24, 2007, at 10:04 PM, Kenneth E Tomiak wrote:
Not interested. There are many solutions out there that can effect
a change
to every member in a PDS and most are FREE.
Yea but are they supported 24x7 ? Or do you get a response well maybe
in the next few weeks I will get a
On Jul 24, 2007, at 11:25 PM, Bill Seubert wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 07:30:36 -0500, William Richter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Timothy,
Internal customers do not ask your question, How do you measure
the total
performance of the whole IT organization?
They are really only interested in
On Jul 24, 2007, at 10:36 PM, Wayne Driscoll wrote:
All programs in the linklist are accessible directly, what is the
possible value of protecting (from read, update protection is
mandatory)
a linklist dataset? I mean if I can execute tso iefbr14, what is the
drawback of me executing tso
Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Gould
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 7:36 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Z/Journal issue June/July 2007
Today I was at another doctors office waiting for my appointment
and was
surprised when I saw that Xephon was now apart of Z
On Jul 25, 2007, at 9:56 AM, Wayne Driscoll wrote:
But what was purpose of this? Was there a security exposure
identified?
If so, what was it? Or was it a case of well, it's always been done
this way.
Wayne Driscoll
Product Developer
JME Software LLC
NOTE: All opinions are strictly my
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070725/tc_nm/
quantum_computing_dc_1;_ylt=Ap_vjcqDm0wY6_fhbxqMXcEE1vAI
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
On Jul 25, 2007, at 2:01 PM, Mark H. Young wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 08:40:09 -0400, Carroll, William
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way to secure certain clist from unauthorized use?
For example if I don't want applications to get into the wlm,
Application, how would I do it? If it
On Jul 26, 2007, at 7:56 AM, Pinnacle wrote:
They just don't get it.
Does SHARE get monies from the vendors for the mailing lists? Or
for other
participation opportunities? Is it possible that vendor
advertising is
necessary in order to be able to continue SHARE and keep the costs
to
it was a host of other no-no
programs that were in sys1.linklib. It was amaspzap and others.
Ed
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Gould
Sent: 25 July 2007 19:00
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Secure clist
On Jul 25
On Jul 26, 2007, at 9:05 AM, Eric Bielefeld wrote:
I know that in Wisconsin, for the few jobs that came up lately, there
seems to be no shortage of people applying for them. Also, management
seems to want to eliminate the positions, and make do with the rest of
the staff instead of replacing
On Jul 26, 2007, at 3:03 PM, Bob Shannon wrote:
As much as I didn't care for it. IBM (when it co-hosted SHARE)
never pulled this type of crap (excuse my english). The DEFAULT
for any mailing should be NO unless I say YES
IBM never co-hosted SHARE. Check your facts once in a while.
bob,
On Jul 26, 2007, at 3:44 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:55:32 -0500, Ed Gould wrote:
Sigh... This was BEFORE that option was available. Please just
remember it JUST WASNT ICKDSF it was a host of other no-no
programs that were in sys1.linklib. It was amaspzap and others
On Jul 26, 2007, at 7:32 AM, Jeffrey Deaver wrote:
They just don't get it.
Does SHARE get monies from the vendors for the mailing lists? Or
for other
participation opportunities? Is it possible that vendor
advertising is
necessary in order to be able to continue SHARE and keep the costs
On Jul 26, 2007, at 5:42 AM, David Boyes wrote:
---SNIP-
On the other hand, an organization that purports to provide IT
education
*ought* to know what is acceptable and not acceptable as good practice
in a well-run IT organization. SHARE's IT decisions are just
On Jul 25, 2007, at 5:37 PM, Kenneth E Tomiak wrote:
--SNIP---
Consider what the requirement is. Someone trying to mass edit a
bunch of
members has a hard time convincing me an outage from using a free
method
to make multiple changes requires a
. They also work in
an extremely politicized environment where VP's scream and curse at
each other and the name of the game is to screw your co-worker .
Ed
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf
Of Ed Gould
Sent: Thursday, July 26
On Jul 26, 2007, at 2:34 AM, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
Doesn't VTAM OWN Kex x'0a ?
Ed
While I don't condone it, I don't see the exposure (unless the
standard zOS
problem state key mask includes key 10).
--
Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen
On Jul 26, 2007, at 7:11 AM, Lizette Koehler wrote:
Listers -
I must now put my two cents in.
How much corporate sponsorship do you think Share gets? I would
think most
of their funding comes from the vendors. And the only reason the
vendors
provide sponsorship is so they can get at
unauthorised users rather than execs?
without writing exit code it was impossible, AFAIK.
Phil.
z/OS Systems Programming Consultant
Website www.zostek.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ed Gould
Sent: 25 July 2007 18:21
On Jul 25, 2007, at 12:42 PM, Anthony Saul Babonas wrote:
DASDVOL profiles can help here..
This was before that option.
Ed
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf
Of Ed Gould
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 12:21 PM
On Jul 27, 2007, at 9:57 AM, Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Jon Brock
Maybe I'm a bit unusual, but I have always wanted to visit Poland.
Russia, too.
I've been close. When I was an Army Brat during the Cold War we
were
On Jul 27, 2007, at 1:48 PM, Thomas Conley wrote:
SNIP--
Let me know if you've had problems like this in IDCAMS, so I can
flesh out the
requirement. War stories, comments, etc. also appreciated.
Regards,
Tom Conley
Tom,
I have done 2 or 3 repromergecats in
On Jul 30, 2007, at 12:55 PM, Fletcher, Kevin wrote:
Liz,
how do I get elected to be President and CEO? :-) I can feel the money
rolling in already.
Thanks,
Fletch
Fletch:
Consider yourself elected.
(signed)
honorary signer
On Jul 30, 2007, at 11:40 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
Tom
In the early days of my using the list I quickly encountered the
problem of the rejection of a post so carefully and painstakingly
constructed. I was informed by some kind person - trying to give
credit on the basis of feeble memory it
On Jul 30, 2007, at 2:50 PM, Ed Finnell wrote:
SNIP-
Oh, I had a tossing and turning moment... Where does HONE live
these days?
Surely if the CE's are having these connectivity issues somebody's
gotta be
locked and loaded on fixing the darn thing.
Probably
On Jul 30, 2007, at 3:18 PM, Darren Evans-Young wrote:
Oh give me a freaking break! Yeah, like I sit here and enforce the
rules
on Joe and not Bob, Harry, or Bill. That's just ludicrous, stupid, and
insulting. Whatever rules (documented or not) are all automated.
If my software sees
On Jul 30, 2007, at 4:06 PM, Darren Evans-Young wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007, Ed Gould wrote:
Correction: I sent you a rejected item saying I was not a member and
asked why. I never heard back.
I have no record of an email from you about being rejected...I save
everything. The last personal
On Jul 30, 2007, at 8:11 PM, Chris Mason wrote:
Ed
As others have mentioned, I think we should accept the decision of
the umpire as final - particularly since he performs the task on
the same basis that an honorary consul performs his/her duties.
Scrolling to the end of a quoted post in
On Jul 31, 2007, at 9:48 AM, Thompson, Steve wrote:
-
SNIP---
Meanwhile, if you contact Mr. Palmisano's office as I have, you might
get more satisfaction. You might get a phone call from his people
asking
just what is the
On Aug 1, 2007, at 8:42 AM, George Bly wrote:
Hi All
We do have lnklst libs in the right spot.
No steplibs in the utility jobs.
But I did not link the svc because we have SMF=NO.
IBMLINK is down and we just set another dump but we can't update
the PMR.
This is why it is important that
On Aug 1, 2007, at 11:16 AM, David Betten wrote:
I don't want to circumvent the PMR process but thought I'd offer
some a
thought based on this information. Double check the storage class
that the
sortwork datasets are being assigned to and make sure the default unit
count is 1. Sortwork
On Aug 1, 2007, at 3:51 PM, CICS Guy wrote:
Am I late?
IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux servers on to mainframes
http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/17998
Interesting thanks. I hope the IBMLINK issues aren't in anyway
connected with this. If they are it will be a major
On Aug 2, 2007, at 11:32 AM, Eric Bielefeld wrote:
I don't have any real answers, just some comments. One bank I worked
for had as their disaster recovery a 370/158 computer left in the
basement of the bank after the datacenter moved 4 blocks away. No I/O
equipment. My last full time job, we
On Aug 3, 2007, at 7:21 AM, Mark Jacobs wrote:
Transmission time from the earth to the moon might be a problem
however. :-)
Dr WHo got around the issue with no problem :)
Ed
--
Mark Jacobs
Technical Services
Time Customer Service - Tampa, FL
--
The secret of life is honesty and
On Aug 6, 2007, at 6:32 AM, Mark Jacobs wrote:
Yes, but its really not practical to send data via the Tardis
however. :-)
--
--snip--
Sure it is the inside of he TARDIS is infinitely large, so the bit
rate is larger than anything that is currently available:)
Ed
On Aug 7, 2007, at 12:29 PM, GAVIN Darren * OPS EAS wrote:
There is no legal precedent preventing someone from Bookmaking a
website
in their web browser. IBM can ask that all they want but it is
completely unenforceable.
They were probably meaning that they didn't want other websites
http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2007/08/
ibm_lost_his_da.html
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
Dell to stuff hypervisors in flash memory
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/08/07/dell_hypervisor_flash/
Sounds to be that this might be doable in IBM's version of Linux...
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
On Aug 8, 2007, at 3:10 AM, Harry Williams wrote:
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007 23:22:46 -0500, Ed Gould
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dell to stuff hypervisors in flash memory
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/08/07/dell_hypervisor_flash/
Sounds to be that this might be doable in IBM's version of Linux
On Aug 8, 2007, at 4:08 PM, McKown, John wrote:
--SNIP-
However, if CA in all good faith truly believes (for whatever reason)
that Rocket Software has improperly acquired their source code, then
they must do something. For all we know, CA __may__ have
On Aug 8, 2007, at 8:11 AM, Ken Gunther wrote:
Plus if I take my personal automobile to a DR test I get paid for
mileage.
Ken G.
Ken:
Not all the time. At one place I worked they would only give you the
money *IF* you had a checking account at the bank that had the DR
On Aug 8, 2007, at 8:49 PM, Robert Justice wrote:
A few executives spending 20+ years in the slammer will bring a
screeching
halt to such crookedness.
John P Baker
agreed, but a few executives need to spend 20+ years in prison for
other things too, might also stop some of this corporate
On Aug 7, 2007, at 9:40 PM, Timothy Sipples wrote:
This is a big announcement with a long name to go with it: IBM
Integrated
Removable Media Manager for the Enterprise on System z V1.1. Call
it IRMM
for short, and it's yet another expansion of the mainframe software
portfolio.
IRMM helps
On Aug 9, 2007, at 10:09 AM, Schramm, Rob wrote:
IBMLINK for ETR is down. Can't open ETRs or view any ETRs.
When I called the support number the queue for help is 13 minutes
long.
I am glad someone else could actually report the issue.
IBMLINK Users Anonymous .. IUA new self-help group
Former CA chief reports to prison Tuesday
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?
command=viewArticleBasicarticleId=9030118source=NLT_PMnlid=8
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
On Aug 11, 2007, at 5:08 AM, Shane wrote:
---SNIP--
Must say I'm surprised this hasn't elicited even one response.
For as long as I've been in the business, it has not embraced new
talent
- getting a start was always hard. People prefer to pay for knowledge
rather than train
http://www.nwi.com/articles/2007/08/12//business/business/
doccf453a582e31d2d38625733300612318.txt
Out with outsourcing?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
On Aug 13, 2007, at 8:38 AM, Kelman, Tom wrote:
-SNIP-
I agree that techies for the most part don't make good managers. I
was
one of those techies that moved into management. I was actually moved
from the position of lead capacity planner to the director of
On Aug 13, 2007, at 9:30 AM, Craddock, Chris wrote:
--SNIP---
This is pretty much exactly what happened across the industry in the
late '70s through the mid '80s. Even to peons like me. I got a metric
boatload of formal classroom training, for which I was (and am) very
grateful.
On Aug 13, 2007, at 1:50 PM, Mark Jacobs wrote:
From the IBMLINK News page;
Because of the recent problems with the IBM Web Authentication
system and their affect on IBMLink/ServiceLink availability, we
have conducted additional investigations into the stability of the
IBM Web
On Aug 14, 2007, at 7:32 AM, Veilleux, Jon L wrote:
From Ed Gould:
http://www.nwi.com/articles/2007/08/12//business/business/
doccf453a582e31d2d38625733300612318.txt
Out with outsourcing?
Someone should tell the IBMLINK folks!!!
I am not a fan of outsourcing and to psuedo threaten
On Aug 14, 2007, at 7:32 AM, Veilleux, Jon L wrote:
From Ed Gould:
http://www.nwi.com/articles/2007/08/12//business/business/
doccf453a582e31d2d38625733300612318.txt
Out with outsourcing?
Someone should tell the IBMLINK folks!!!
I am not a fan of outsourcing
On Aug 14, 2007, at 8:47 AM, Veilleux, Jon L wrote:
Dave O'Brian said:
Ed,
Recently IBM had announced the transitioning of some 10K programmer
jobs from Europe and the US to India.
Perhaps the problems that we are seeing with IBMLINK is an
outgrowth of
that decision. Perhaps that is
On Aug 14, 2007, at 12:53 PM, esmie moo wrote:
Just to add my 2 cents. Who is running the computer systems for
LAX? My flight was delayed 15 hours. Do they have heavy accents?
Not to add to much fuel to the fire. There was an article about
hospitals and CAT_SCANS. Some (most?)
Howard,
Of course there is... but you must know what you are doing:)
//zap exec amaspzap
//sysprint dd sysout=*
//syslib dd dsn=format4.dscb,disp=old,unit=sysallda,vol=ser=volser
//sysin dd *
The superzap statements are up to you:)
Ed
On Aug 14, 2007, at 2:22 PM, Howard Rifkind wrote:
I
On Aug 16, 2007, at 9:29 AM, Steve Runtsch wrote:
I'm looking for something much easier.either using IBMLINK or
ShopzSeries to just get a list of HIPERS without having to pull
maintenance, etc. Thanks.
Rgrds, Joseph Sumi
This does not require downloading maintenance, only ENHANCED
On Aug 16, 2007, at 10:28 AM, Tergerson, John wrote:
SNIP__
Ed, if you really have nothing better to do than look every half hour
for additional HIPER maintenance, you really need a life :) Yesterday
is current enough for me.
John
If that is what is good
On Aug 16, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Craddock, Chris wrote:
Bob Shannon said
I had the opposite experience. As a rookie I went to classes all the
time.
Ah, the good old days ;-)
Me too. My boss used to bring the IBM education catalog around every
quarter and I'd have to pick something relevant.
On Aug 16, 2007, at 2:05 PM, Tergerson, John wrote:
Ed,
Joseph's question was about how to monitor HIPER fixes, not about how
and when to apply maintenance. I try to always go through a current
round of RSU maintenance before a product goes into production to keep
it as current as possible
On Aug 17, 2007, at 2:13 PM, Katie Thorpe wrote:
Hello! We are considering the viability of switching our
Compuware products
(Fileaid, Abendaid/XLS, Abendaid/CICS) to IBM replacements. We are
a very
straightforward mainframe installation with no database involved.
Has anyone done that,
On Aug 17, 2007, at 2:26 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 08/05/2007
at 08:42 AM, Binyamin Dissen [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I take it that you have not considered the possibility of a
supernova.
The Sun is a yellow dwarf; going supernova is not an option.
The list of withdrawn products at
http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/FLASH10451
was a pleasant surprise to me.
I do not want to disagree with IBM (at all) in their announcement.
I think that this list was a long time in coming. I just wish there
was a better way to
On Aug 19, 2007, at 10:12 AM, Bob Shannon wrote:
Is the SHARE MVS group getting this type of information out?
Given that the TechDoc was written by Bette Brody, and given that
Bette attends every SHARE, it's a given that the information was
disseminated.
If it makes you feel better,
On Aug 19, 2007, at 3:29 PM, Eric Bielefeld wrote:
At the last full time job I had, I always got a letter from IBM at
least a year before any product that we had was going to be withdrawn.
I'm not sure what the problem is. If the product is withdrawn from
marketing, you shouldn't be able to
* Identity attack spreads; 1.6M records stolen from Monster.com
http://cwflyris.computerworld.com/t/1971713/20890881/75597/2/
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 20, 2007, at 6:29 PM, Ulrich Krueger wrote:
Oh, that chaps my hide!
I'm currently a customer of Monster myself, while looking for a
job as
z/OS sysprog in the San Jose, CA area.
So now my personal information is probably in the hands of some bad
guys ...
and you know what? I
1 - 100 of 2266 matches
Mail list logo
