Re: Transferring stuff from Mainframe to a RDz/UT clone of itself

2012-05-28 Thread Thomas Conley

On 5/28/2012 1:26 AM, melvinjac...@iinet.net.au wrote:

On Friday, 25 May 2012 22:13:55 UTC+10, Thomas Conley  wrote:

On 5/25/2012 2:03 AM, mpjac...@comcen.com.au wrote:

Hi all

Can't readily see how to search the group, so apologies if this info is in here 
somewhere

I'm just after opinion as to the best way to transfer files across from a normal MF Lpar , 
including some USS directories, to a copy of this Lpar running on RDz/UT under RedHat linux on a 
VM server. I'm told that shared DASD is not possible between the MF Lpar   the RDz 
instance,   we have FTP or NJE (don't know which is quicker). The basic scenario is to do 
regular incremental refreshes of the RDz/UT environment from it's big brother MF 
instance

I'm posting this last thing on a Fri arvo, so may not get back to it before 
Monday (it's just gone 4pm here in Sydney)

Thx

Melvyn Jacobs


Melvyn,

I would run DFDSS DUMP, TERSE, FTP binary, DETERSE, then DFDSS RESTORE.

Regards,
Tom Conley



dumb question - the plan that I was given just said basically DFDSS DUMP, FTP, 
RESTORE - what advantage does

On Friday, 25 May 2012 22:13:55 UTC+10, Thomas Conley  wrote:

On 5/25/2012 2:03 AM, mpjac...@comcen.com.au wrote:

Hi all

Can't readily see how to search the group, so apologies if this info is in here 
somewhere

I'm just after opinion as to the best way to transfer files across from a normal MF Lpar , 
including some USS directories, to a copy of this Lpar running on RDz/UT under RedHat linux on a 
VM server. I'm told that shared DASD is not possible between the MF Lpar   the RDz 
instance,   we have FTP or NJE (don't know which is quicker). The basic scenario is to do 
regular incremental refreshes of the RDz/UT environment from it's big brother MF 
instance

I'm posting this last thing on a Fri arvo, so may not get back to it before 
Monday (it's just gone 4pm here in Sydney)

Thx

Melvyn Jacobs


Melvyn,

I would run DFDSS DUMP, TERSE, FTP binary, DETERSE, then DFDSS RESTORE.

Regards,
Tom Conley

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Hi Tom

Thanks for that - any particular reason for including TERSE, over just DFDSS  
FTP ?

cheers

Melvyn


Melvyn,

The DFDSS dump dataset is a RECFM=U file.  I've had difficulty in 
transferring RECFM=U files with FTP, so TERSEing them creates a nice FB 
1024 format that can FTP cleanly in binary mode.  I also get the 
compression for a faster FTP.  Someone else in this thread recommended 
TSO XMIT which basically does the same thing without compression,  by 
creating an FB 80 format record.


Regards,
Tom Conley

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Transferring stuff from Mainframe to a RDz/UT clone of itself

2012-05-27 Thread Kirk Wolf
I believe that MFNetDisk could be used to replicate volumes to a PC.  I
wonder if you could convert the MFNetDisk volume file to the volume-file
format used by zPDT?

Kirk Wolf
Dovetailed Technologies
http://dovetail.com

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Transferring stuff from Mainframe to a RDz/UT clone of itself

2012-05-27 Thread Mike Schwab
http://www.mail-archive.com/ibm-main@bama.ua.edu/msg124717.html

On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Kirk Wolf k...@dovetail.com wrote:
 I believe that MFNetDisk could be used to replicate volumes to a PC.  I
 wonder if you could convert the MFNetDisk volume file to the volume-file
 format used by zPDT?

 Kirk Wolf
 Dovetailed Technologies
 http://dovetail.com

-- 
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Rangers go to get away from it all?

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Transferring stuff from Mainframe to a RDz/UT clone of itself

2012-05-26 Thread Timothy Sipples
To add a couple comments, NFS could be part of the loop. It's more
convenient than FTP, I think.

Moreover, SCLM (which is part of z/OS) with an appropriate exit seems like
a good idea, with better organization and control (and therefore better
mistake avoidance) for the sort of stuff you'd be doing with RDz.

For any network transmissions think about whether intercept is possible.
IPSec or a secure file transfer could be prudent, even on an internal
network.


Timothy Sipples
Resident Enterprise Architect (Based in Singapore)
E-Mail: timothy.sipp...@us.ibm.com
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Transferring stuff from Mainframe to a RDz/UT clone of itself

2012-05-25 Thread Thomas Conley

On 5/25/2012 2:03 AM, mpjac...@comcen.com.au wrote:

Hi all

Can't readily see how to search the group, so apologies if this info is in here 
somewhere

I'm just after opinion as to the best way to transfer files across from a normal MF Lpar , 
including some USS directories, to a copy of this Lpar running on RDz/UT under RedHat linux on a 
VM server. I'm told that shared DASD is not possible between the MF Lpar  the RDz 
instance,  we have FTP or NJE (don't know which is quicker). The basic scenario is to do 
regular incremental refreshes of the RDz/UT environment from it's big brother MF 
instance

I'm posting this last thing on a Fri arvo, so may not get back to it before 
Monday (it's just gone 4pm here in Sydney)

Thx

Melvyn Jacobs


Melvyn,

I would run DFDSS DUMP, TERSE, FTP binary, DETERSE, then DFDSS RESTORE.

Regards,
Tom Conley

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN


Re: Transferring stuff from Mainframe to a RDz/UT clone of itself

2012-05-25 Thread McKown, John
Another, possibly too weird, technique would be to use GIMZIP. GIMZIP supports 
the packaging of both z/OS datasets and z/OS UNIX files into a container 
file. It is also compressed and needs to be transferred in BINary mode. And 
then there is the CBT tape method. Use TSO XMIT for all the z/OS datasets. Put 
each XMIT in a separate member of a PDS. Use z/OS UNIX pax to make an archive 
of all the UNIX files. pax can output that directly into another member in the 
same PDS. Then either XMIT that PDS and transfer it, or TERSE it.

Just pointing out some alternatives. I, personally, have done the latter (XMIT) 
but only because I submitted it to the CBT Tape and that's how they wanted it 
done.

-- 
John McKown 
Systems Engineer IV
IT

Administrative Services Group

HealthMarkets(r)

9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010
(817) 255-3225 phone * 
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com

Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message may contain confidential or 
proprietary information. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact 
the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 
HealthMarkets(r) is the brand name for products underwritten and issued by the 
insurance subsidiaries of HealthMarkets, Inc. -The Chesapeake Life Insurance 
Company(r), Mid-West National Life Insurance Company of TennesseeSM and The 
MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company.SM

 -Original Message-
 From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List 
 [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Thomas Conley
 Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 7:10 AM
 To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
 Subject: Re: Transferring stuff from Mainframe to a RDz/UT 
 clone of itself
 
 On 5/25/2012 2:03 AM, mpjac...@comcen.com.au wrote:
  Hi all
 
  Can't readily see how to search the group, so apologies if 
 this info is in here somewhere
 
  I'm just after opinion as to the best way to transfer files 
 across from a normal MF Lpar , including some USS 
 directories, to a copy of this Lpar running on RDz/UT under 
 RedHat linux on a VM server. I'm told that shared DASD is not 
 possible between the MF Lpar  the RDz instance,  we have 
 FTP or NJE (don't know which is quicker). The basic scenario 
 is to do regular incremental refreshes of the RDz/UT 
 environment from it's big brother MF instance
 
  I'm posting this last thing on a Fri arvo, so may not get 
 back to it before Monday (it's just gone 4pm here in Sydney)
 
  Thx
 
  Melvyn Jacobs
 
 Melvyn,
 
 I would run DFDSS DUMP, TERSE, FTP binary, DETERSE, then 
 DFDSS RESTORE.
 
 Regards,
 Tom Conley
 
 --
 For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
 send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
 
 

--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN