On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:37:23 -0600, Ed Gould wrote:
On Jan 9, 2008, at 10:49 PM, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
At 15:37 -0600 on 01/09/2008, Ed Gould wrote:
Thanks... do you remember which release of MFT this was? Did MFT
do the split cylinder data set creation?
While I can not name a release
On Jan 10, 2008, at 7:32 AM, Bill Godfrey wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:37:23 -0600, Ed Gould wrote:
On Jan 9, 2008, at 10:49 PM, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
At 15:37 -0600 on 01/09/2008, Ed Gould wrote:
Thanks... do you remember which release of MFT this was? Did MFT
do the split cylinder
On Jan 8, 2008, at 1:19 PM, Phil Payne wrote:
For around 18 months I supported a card input validation suite that
ran on a 24KB 360/25.
The backup system was a 360/50 under OS/360 MFT. The code was all
written quite deliberately
with this compatibility in mind, and it actually wasn't
-snip-
Thanks... do you remember which release of MFT this was? Did MFT do the
split cylinder data set creation?
--unsnip--
I can't give the first release, but it worked OK in release 14.6 of
OS/360. That was
On Jan 9, 2008, at 8:13 PM, Rick Fochtman wrote:
-snip-
Thanks... do you remember which release of MFT this was? Did MFT
do the split cylinder data set creation?
--unsnip--
I can't give the first release,
At 15:37 -0600 on 01/09/2008, Ed Gould wrote about Re: VTOC Fmt6
(just curious):
Thanks... do you remember which release of MFT this was? Did MFT do
the split cylinder data set creation?
While I can not name a release level, I can state that OS/360 JCL
supported the SPLIT Parm
On Jan 9, 2008, at 10:49 PM, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
At 15:37 -0600 on 01/09/2008, Ed Gould wrote about Re: VTOC Fmt6
(just curious):
Thanks... do you remember which release of MFT this was? Did MFT
do the split cylinder data set creation?
While I can not name a release level, I can
On Jan 7, 2008, at 4:09 PM, (IBM Mainframe Discussion List) wrote:
-
SNIP-
Next came compatibility between a DASD volume created on DOS/360
and being
able to access its data under OS/360. This is why
In a message dated 1/8/2008 7:57:10 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I do not remember the split parameter on JCL on(in) JCL from MFT 18.6
days but you say in was still there in MVS 2.0 are you sure it was
there(or when it was dropped)?
I probably erred. I
In a message dated 12/31/2007 12:47:22 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
What was Fmt6 for ?
Originally in DOS/360 you could, and in some cases were encouraged to,
allocate files so that more than one file would share the same cylinder
numbers as
another file.
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 19:46:39 +0100, R.S. wrote:
What was Fmt6 for ?
Disclaimer: I know it is obsolete and no longer used.
It was for split-cylinder allocation. It hasn't been supported (or needed) in
many years. Check the IBM-MAIN archives for additional information - it has
been discussed
At 12:46 PM 12/31/2007, you wrote:
What was Fmt6 for ?
I found two contradictory explanations
Disclaimer: I know it is obsolete and no longer used.
Happy New Year
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
It was used for SPLIT allocation (cylinders which were shared). Allocated by
SPLIT= instead of
On Dec 31, 2007, at 1:33 PM, Michael Stack wrote:
At 12:46 PM 12/31/2007, you wrote:
What was Fmt6 for ?
I found two contradictory explanations
Disclaimer: I know it is obsolete and no longer used.
Happy New Year
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
It was used for SPLIT allocation
My rather poor memory says it was DOS only. I don't recall it being
available at MFTII rel 18.6 (?).
Somebody pipe up if I am wrong, please.
...
I think it must not be just DOS because a B37-08 abend has as one
of its explanations:
o A split cylinder data set was located on cylinder zero,
14 matches
Mail list logo
