Dear Ifeffit community,
a short reaction from the FEFFgroup.
1/ It's true that we don't follow up on the ifeffit ML 100%. Important
issues usually do get through to us. We highly value the ifeffit
community. We can also be contacted directly for problems that are FEFF
related rather than
Hi Bruce,
thanks for your answer.
I'm glad that we seem to be in agreement about the main point, which is
that a FEFF9L is the best way forward (integrates with analysis tools; has
all improvements and bugfixes; free). I'll fire up developer communication
about this (including you).
Thank
Hi all,
I think that several of the points raised in the last few replies will be
better addressed off-ML. (See above)
As for the benefits of FEFF9:
* calculation of potentials is more stable and more accurate
* improved self-energy (- better peak positions and widths)
* ability to use
