On 9/22/11 4:39 AM, Charlie Clark wrote:
Hi Alex,
Am 22.09.2011, 00:37 Uhr, schrieb Alex Clark acl...@aclark.net:
Hi,
Can anyone comment on the following with any intelligence?
- https://github.com/collective/Pillow/issues/10
As Pillow is primarily a packaging fork, I don't really want to go
Am 22.09.2011, 14:20 Uhr, schrieb Alex Clark acl...@aclark.net:
Right, in other words if I understand you correctly any internal patches
should only be applied if they directly correspond to previous or
upcoming changes in PIL itself. Even then, the preferred approach would
be to
On 9/22/11 8:45 AM, Charlie Clark wrote:
Am 22.09.2011, 14:20 Uhr, schrieb Alex Clark acl...@aclark.net:
Right, in other words if I understand you correctly any internal
patches should only be applied if they directly correspond to previous
or upcoming changes in PIL itself. Even then, the
Hi,
Can anyone comment on the following with any intelligence?
- https://github.com/collective/Pillow/issues/10
As Pillow is primarily a packaging fork, I don't really want to go
changing the image code ;-). But, if it looks like a reasonable fix I
may consider it.
Thanks,
Alex
