David, I'd be happy to get you going on OpenSSL for Windows off the list.
It's actually quite easy and Windows is not a "step-child" but fully
supported.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: "David Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 19:58
Subject
On Thu, 6 Jun 2002, David Harris wrote:
> This section, and a reading of IMAP-TLS, appears to be saying that an
> IMAP implementation can only be considered compliant if it implements
> SSL (sorry for the old terminology - I'm using it to be specific).
Hi David -
Your fears are correct. IESG is
On 4 Jun 2002 at 17:13, Mark Crispin wrote:
> Network Working Group M. Crispin
> INTERNET-DRAFT: IMAP4rev1 University of Washington
> Obsoletes: 2060June 2002
>
> Client and server
On Wed, 05 Jun 2002 03:37:24 -0600, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> > If you are foolish^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hpublic-spirited enough to be willing to
> > take it on, I can send you copies of both Rob's document and Bill Yeager's
> > commentary on it. :-)
> I am willing to take this one.
That's great! Attached
Mark Crispin wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> > > [IMAP-DISC] Austein, R., "Synchronization Operations for Disconnected
> > > IMAP4 Clients", Work in Progress.
> > I don't recognize this document. It either became an RFC or expired a long time
> > ago.
>
> Yes, it did exp
