On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 07:58:02PM -0800, Todd Lyons wrote:
at m4 code and trying to figure out what I can do to make sendmail check
the user at SMTP connect time the way it does if I configure sendmail to
deliver to a regular mbox mail spool.
Here's what a quick Google found:
Gary Mills wrote:
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 11:29:08PM +0100, Andrzej Adam Filip wrote:
Andrzej Adam Filip [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would like to know who is interested in helping to develop next
versions of advanced Sendmail and Cyrus IMAP integration methods.
I would like to further
Jo Rhett wrote:
Gary Mills wrote:
We've had excellent sendmail/cyrus integration for years, with
35,000 users. It's done by having all users in the NIS map on
the mail server. No modification to sendmail is necessary because
getpwnam() returns the passwd entry for the user. Users can't log
Todd Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
My rudimentary understanding of sendmail macros makes me think that
instead of checking for users locally, it's checking for user cyrus
locally (which always succeeds), so the email is accepted for any user.
If it's a problem with the older version
Hi !!!
We have a big email server with about 2000 mailboxes, over SuSE 10.1
with SuSE 2.2.12. In order to enhace reliability and performance (over
slow 64 kbps internet links) we are moving to a distributed server schema.
So we set up a new server, and then tried to move some mailboxes to the
In one of our serveres we found bouces in local delivery, cyrus 2.2.12
and Postfix2.2.9.
The problem happends randomly: sometimes a mail is not delivered to a
mailbox. Then we get this error:
Dec 4 10:41:15 mail-server postfix/lmtp[24330]: E9BEA3B04EC:
to=[EMAIL PROTECTED], orig_to=[EMAIL
Jo Rhett [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gary Mills wrote:
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 05:33:15PM -0800, Jo Rhett wrote:
Gary Mills wrote:
We've had excellent sendmail/cyrus integration for years, with
35,000 users. It's done by having all users in the NIS map on
the mail server. No modification to
Andrzej Adam Filip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) Methods you suggest do not give a chance to reject messages to over
quota mailboxes *in SMTP session*.
...which can be a good thing if you want to give users a chance to
clean up or request more space.
The trouble with smmapd is that it gives
Dear list,
I'm using Horde/Ingo for creating sieve rules and have activated a rule
for Spamassassin moving mails with X-Spam-Status: Yes to spamfolder.
Also, there's a rule to forward every mail to another address. Looks
like this:
require [imapflags, fileinto];
# Spam
if header
Hi cyrus-people,
I'm curious about the follwoing behaviour (this has not happened on
cyrus, but with courier):
A customer is sending a specific (bad) e-mail to 1000 mailboxes.
In courier I would write a little script, that greps in the
usermailboxes for something uniqe, move the file to
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 16:33 +0100, Wolfgang Hennerbichler wrote:
I guess I can't do this in courier, as I would mess up the internal
db-structure.
Is there a way to (easily) do this in cyrus, without calling
cyrreconstruct?
Why this strange limitation?
You can reconstruct specific
On Fri, 01 Dec 2006 12:28:56 -0500
Kevin Kruzich wrote:
Hi,
I recently had to migrate a sasl auth db from GNU DBM to Berkeley
DB. I used this:
http://dcs.nac.uci.edu/~strombrg/convert-database
Mmmm why do I need to migrate? I just wondered how to recover my
broken db file.
Also,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 09:23:47PM -0800, Jo Rhett wrote:
Error because the user doesn't exist. I have been googling and looking
at m4 code and trying to figure out what I can do to make sendmail check
the user at SMTP connect time the way it does
On Monday 04 December 2006 10:31 am, Todd Lyons wrote:
As I see it, a more sendmailish solution would be to use a little
sendmail-fu and make it so that sendmail checks for local user at smtp
time, but delivers to cyrus at deliver time. I don't have such fu, but
I see now as a good enough
On 04.12.2006, at 17:11, Mirosław Jaworski wrote:
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 16:33 +0100, Wolfgang Hennerbichler wrote:
I guess I can't do this in courier, as I would mess up the internal
db-structure.
Is there a way to (easily) do this in cyrus, without calling
cyrreconstruct?
Why this strange
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 11:22:10AM -0600, Dave McCracken wrote:
As I see it, a more sendmailish solution would be to use a little
sendmail-fu and make it so that sendmail checks for local user at smtp
time, but delivers to cyrus at deliver time. I don't have such fu, but
I see now as a good
Is it possible to set any option(s) in cyrus.conf to have the imap
listen only to calls from within the subnet?
I want to enable admin logins from another machine in the subnet, but
not from external calls.
Or is it simply easier to add another address to the NIC and have it
listen to that one?
On Mon, 2006-12-04 at 10:24 -0800, Todd Lyons wrote:
This solved my problem but it requires that I have a local machine account
for
each cyrus user. As a small domain that's not a problem for me, but others
might find it too restrictive.
I'll test it. As long as by local user you mean
On Dec 3, 2006, at 12:48 PM, Jo Rhett wrote:
Ken, it's been another month. How can I help move this along?
Just popping up here to say that I run another site affected by this
bug and would love to see it resolved. If I had more than rudimentary
C skills, I would take a stab at a patch.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 07:58:02PM -0800, Todd Lyons wrote:
I'm looking at a cyrus limitation right now. I'm really thinking this
is not cyrus' problem. I'm trying to figure out if it's actually a
sendmail limitation or a sendmail config error on
On Dec 4, 2006, at 6:09 AM, Gary Mills wrote:
In our case there's no export involved. All of the information comes
from the same SQL database. Somebody reinventing this scheme today
would probably use LDAP instead.
Really? Sendmail queries the SQL for each delivery recipient?
Clearly,
On Dec 4, 2006, at 7:22 AM, Joseph Brennan wrote:
Andrzej Adam Filip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) Methods you suggest do not give a chance to reject messages to
over
quota mailboxes *in SMTP session*.
...which can be a good thing if you want to give users a chance to
clean up or request
On Dec 4, 2006, at 8:31 AM, Todd Lyons wrote:
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 09:23:47PM -0800, Jo Rhett wrote:
Can you create a list of all of your users from some other
information?
If so,
1. Put a list of all of your domains in /etc/mail/virtual-domains
2. put each and every user in virtusertable
Joseph Brennan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andrzej Adam Filip [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) Methods you suggest do not give a chance to reject messages to over
quota mailboxes *in SMTP session*.
...which can be a good thing if you want to give users a chance to
clean up or request more space.
On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 12:35:23PM -0800, Jo Rhett wrote:
On Dec 4, 2006, at 6:09 AM, Gary Mills wrote:
In our case there's no export involved. All of the information comes
from the same SQL database. Somebody reinventing this scheme today
would probably use LDAP instead.
Really?
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Muenz, Michael wrote:
Dear list,
I'm using Horde/Ingo for creating sieve rules and have activated a rule for
Spamassassin moving mails with X-Spam-Status: Yes to spamfolder. Also,
there's a rule to forward every mail to another address. Looks like this:
require
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Anders Norrbring wrote:
Is it possible to set any option(s) in cyrus.conf to have the imap listen
only to calls from within the subnet?
I want to enable admin logins from another machine in the subnet, but not
from external calls.
Or is it simply easier to add another
On Dec 4, 2006, at 1:05 PM, Gary Mills wrote:
Really? Sendmail queries the SQL for each delivery recipient?
Potentially, but nscd caches the results. Sendmail also does
authenticated SMTP via SASL, just like Cyrus IMAP does it.
They are nicely integrated.
Clearly, there is an export
I recently moved all my users from proprietary wemail (using local sendmail) to
latest cyrus and sendmail using lmtp.
I used to use tivoli to backup the old server (which was ok since no data bases
were involved)... but since cyrus has databases and such, I am concern about
file-locking and
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Rafael Mahecha wrote:
I recently moved all my users from proprietary wemail (using local
sendmail) to latest cyrus and sendmail using lmtp.
I used to use tivoli to backup the old server (which was ok since no
data bases were involved)... but since cyrus has databases and
I have found a link to a process that might be helpful:
http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki/bin/view/Cyrus/Backup
Aside from this, we have done it the old fashion way: tar zip on a
live system late at night. We just had a major server failure on
10/25/2006 which we were able to recover from.
This usually happens because the lmtp connection got out of sync somehow.
There was a bug in older postfix's about this:
http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2004-04/1731.html
I haven't seen the problem since then since Wietse fixed it, but I'd try
setting lmtp_cache_connect=no in
Hi Ken
There's a bug with replication and renaming INBOX - INBOX.blah.
From http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3501.txt:
Renaming INBOX is permitted, and has special behavior. It moves
all messages in INBOX to a new mailbox with the given name,
leaving INBOX empty. If the server
Robert Mueller wrote:
Hi Ken
There's a bug with replication and renaming INBOX - INBOX.blah.
From http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3501.txt:
Renaming INBOX is permitted, and has special behavior. It moves
all messages in INBOX to a new mailbox with the given name,
leaving INBOX
On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 19:42:52 -0500, Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi Rob,
This is already a known problem (bug #2727?). I haven't come up with a
clean fix yet, although I haven't thought about it much.
My reading of this is that it affects SEEN state generally, not just
Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Mon, 04 Dec 2006 19:42:52 -0500, Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi Rob,
This is already a known problem (bug #2727?). I haven't come up with a
clean fix yet, although I haven't thought about it much.
My reading of this is that it affects SEEN state generally,
36 matches
Mail list logo
