Re: Upgrading Cyrus from 2.3.16, going to 2.5.11 or 3.0.2 ?

Eric, I know 3.0 compiles on Solaris 10 & 11; I think the only bit that didn’t work was the http section to provide caldav/carddav, as the implementation seems to depend on linux’isms. I got it compiled without the calendar and address book functionality (although that was a couple of months

Re: Update from cyrus-imapd 2.5 to 3.0

> "JLT" == Jason L Tibbitts writes: JLT> Maybe it would be better if you could provide more explicit JLT> information in some way. Like, a directory listing or something. To update the list, the issue was that the admins: line contained a regular user ID. When that user

Re: About upgrade and building without caldav/carddav server

Hi, > On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 16:41:48 +0200 > Egoitz Aurrekoetxea said: egoitz> Yes I'll build Cyrus IMAP as we run FreeBSD. The cyrus-imapd30 ports has HTTP option but off by default. So, the cyrus-imapd30 package is built without caldav/carddav server. Sincerely,

Re: About upgrade and building without caldav/carddav server

Thanks a lot Nic!!! Yes I'll build Cyrus IMAP as we run FreeBSD. Extremely helpful too your notes mate :) :) I just hoped to know if it was possible :) and you have give notes of incredibly huge useful info... Thanks a lot mates... I can say the same... please ask me if you needed

Re: About upgrade and building without caldav/carddav server

Thanks a lot Nicola!!! Very useful information El 28/6/17 a las 1:36, Nicola Nye escribió: By the way, when upgrading from a 2.3.1X server... can you directly install a 3.0 in the server and should it work?. Is it recommended to perhaps go thought the 2.5 version, reconvert

Re: About upgrade and building without caldav/carddav server

Thanks a lot for all Robert!! El 27/6/17 a las 10:44, Robert Stepanek escribió: Hi, On Fri, Jun 23, 2017, at 14:57, Egoitz Aurrekoetxea wrote: Is it possible to build Cyrus IMAP 3.0 without Caldav/Carddav server?. I say this because we have been using Davical from some time now, have all

Upgrading Cyrus from 2.3.16, going to 2.5.11 or 3.0.2 ?

Hi, Our environment is Solaris 10 / Intel. Are there good reasons to stay away from 3.0 ? We have a pretty impressive user count and mail spool volume but not a lot of complexity (no murder nor replication, no domains, and few, if any, access control extravaganza). Thank you in advance