) in a
boot script
David Lang
On
Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Jeremy Howard wrote:
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 22:08:50 +1000
From: Jeremy Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lawrence Greenfield [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Horst Lederhaas [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: limit of file descriptors
.
it's a problem, but it's far less of a problem then attempting to parse a
unix mail file to get the message you need, that starts to slow down
significantly at 1000 messages (on a much faster linux box)
David Lang
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Amos Gouaux wrote:
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 09:03:16 -0500
then that there is no way to do the user mapping at this layer.
David Lang
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Chris Gilbert wrote:
Hi,
I've just setup a system running cyrus for my own use (it's installed and
seems to be running fine 8).
However I've got a problem with unknown users. Having come from picking up
mail via POP
different structures that are
designed to handle the large numbers of directories problem better.
David Lang
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Andres Maduro wrote:
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 23:16:06 -0800
From: Andres Maduro [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Too many users with Cyrus IMAP
Hi,
I
think you will be able
to get away without needing to do the sync trick for the mailboxes
themselves.
if you need to do anything you may want to make the journal syncronous to
avoid the possibility that you accept the mail and crash before the
journal gets written to disk.
David Lang
what hardware do you use to support this load?
David Lang
On Sun, 24 Mar 2002, Nick Ustinov wrote:
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2002 11:52:32 +0200
From: Nick Ustinov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jonas Jacobsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cyrus and IMP
We are running cyrus 2.1.0
D.
you tell outlook that you have an IMAP server that you want it to connect
to and it works (at least it works as well as outlook ever works ;-)
you will have to look in your outlook documentation for where the option
is to tell it where your mail servers are.
David Lang
On 26 Mar 2002
have you attempted to configure SASL to just do plain passwords, it's
likly that outlook can't do anythign more sophisticated.
David Lang
On 26 Mar 2002, Chris Picton wrote:
Date: 26 Mar 2002 15:32:44 +0200
From: Chris Picton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Chris Picton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL
1. get a cert that is valid (otherwise you are vunerable to
man-in-the-middle attacks anyway, and it's a bad idea to get users used to
ignoring security warnings)
2. if they can disable SSL can't they disable 'secure passwords' and cause
it to revert to plain logins anyway?
David Lang
On 26
then if you could check.
David Lang
On 2 Apr 2002, Jim Levie wrote:
Date: 02 Apr 2002 13:59:18 -0600
From: Jim Levie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: removing banners from cyrus
On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 13:26, Ken Murchison wrote:
Clifford Thurber
message until they check it I need to at least be
able to throttle the messages to one per (whatever time period).
David Lang
of the
limitation more then the generic database two-way-sync problem
David Lang
On Tue, 4 Feb 2003, Phil Howard wrote:
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 03:19:12 -0600
From: Phil Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rob Siemborski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: looking for Cyrus mail format
on it, but don't stop maintaining the current version, the apache
core code may not be the right thing in the long run.
David Lang
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Rob Mueller wrote:
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:45:00 +1100
From: Rob Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lawrence Greenfield [EMAIL PROTECTED
I will also add that on current *nix systems the advantages of threads
over processes is a lot less then it used to be. In my case we are running
apache2 on AIX and found no noticable difference between the two (so we
are useing processes for the stability reasons you note below)
David Lang
list can loose data when there is a
crash and if one system goes haywire and starts scribbling on the shared
disk it will trash any filesystem.
David Lang
--On Friday, September 10, 2004 13:24 +0200 Paul Dekkers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
We're implementing a new mailplatform running on two
also take a look at the heartbeat package at linux-ha.org This works on
linux, *BSD, and solaris (there were people working on a AIX port, but
they apparently dropped it shortly before finishing)
David Lang
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004,
Jure [UTF-8] PeÄ~Mar wrote:
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 17:07:20
how much are you asking for?
David Lang
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 11:44:45 -0400
From: Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Paul Dekkers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: David Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Cyrus crashed on redundant platform
about it so that it can failover to the backup box(s)
as needed, but for now simply having the full data at the backup location
would be so far ahead of where we are now that the need to reconfigure
murder for a failover is realitivly trivial by comparison.
David Lang
--
There are two ways
there.
David Lang
Paul
---
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
--
There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to make it so simple
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
David Lang wrote:
On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Ken Murchison wrote:
Question: Are people looking at this as both redundancy and
performance, or just redundance?
for performance we already have murder, what we currently lack is
redundancy. once we have
that particular problem will use
it and it's likly to have issues with new changes.
David Lang
--
There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to make it so simple
that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other way is to make it so
complicated that there are no obvious
On Fri, 17 Sep 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David Lang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mike, one of the problems with this is that different databases have
different interfaces and capabilities.
if you design it to work on Oracle then if you try to make it work on
MySQL there are going
to be identified in the code and hooks put in place in
the code at those locations. the details of the hooks will differ slightly
David Lang
--
There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other way
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004, David Carter wrote:
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004, David Lang wrote:
5. Active/Active
designate one of the boxes as primary and identify all items in the
datastore that absolutly must not be subject to race conditions between
the two boxes (message UUID for example). In addition
to just happen (they are also much
more intrusinve to the code so there is some possibility of them not
getting merged into the core code quickly)
David Lang
-- There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to
make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004, David Carter wrote:
On Sun, 19 Sep 2004, David Lang wrote:
assiming that the simplest method would cost ~$3000 to code I would make a
wild guess that the ballpark figures would be
1. active/passive without automatic failover $3k
2. active/passive with automatic failover
not a problem to skip them.
#3 involves changes to the update code to have cyrus take special actions
with soem types of updates. there would need to be changes in the same
area for #5, but they would be different.
David Lang
--
There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way
(thousands of messages in the inbox)
David Lang
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, John
Madden wrote:
Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 13:12:57 -0500 (EST)
From: John Madden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: best filesystem for imap server
I dont want to start a religious battle
a bad taste behind.
also note that if you are useing IDE drives you have no way of really
knowing when the data has hit the platter (as opposed to just being in the
buffer of the drive) as many of the drives will lie to you and tell you
the write is complete once it hits the buffers.
David Lang
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Jules Agee wrote:
Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2004 10:11:21 -0800
From: Jules Agee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: best filesystem for imap server
David Lang wrote:
also note that if you are useing IDE drives you have no way of really
knowing when the data has hit
-end SCSI) drives
that could use their rotational energy to power their electronics to write
the data and adjust the dataclock as the spindle slowed, but I don't think
any drive does this anymore.
David Lang
--
There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to make it so
simple
Paul, I recently took a look at useing thunderbird 1.0 with IMAP and found
that it was storing a lot of info locally, is it really that good an IMAP
client?
David Lang
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Paul Dekkers wrote:
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 10:17:10 +0100
From: Paul Dekkers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Thomas
Take a look at Popfile (on sourceforge) it will train when you move a
message into a folder and retrain when you move a message to another
folder.
the current version is single user (you would need to run one copy per
user), but the development version is adding multi-user capability)
David
of the slower clients to start
with)
David Lang
--
There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies.
-- C.A.R. Hoare
---
Cyrus Home Page
I would be interested in this, thanks.
David Lang
On Wed, 11 May 2005, ¿øÅÂȯ wrote:
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 23:29:55 +0900
From: ¿øÅÂȯ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Markus Heller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Subject: RE: Database backend?
Hi,
I had an experience to implement
and
new folders.
beyond that do some testing with huge message folders on different
filesystems. you may find that other filesystems handle huge folders
better then what you're useing.
David Lang
On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Jared Watkins wrote:
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 13:26:31 -0400
From: Jared
dirs of 1000 1K files) the time to read them
went from ~5 min with the old allocator useed in ext2 to 40 min for the
one that's the default for ext3.
David Lang
--
There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to make it so
simple that there are obviously no deficiencies
On Mon, 7 Nov 2005, Sergio Devojno Bruder wrote:
David Lang wrote:
(..)
I was recently doing some testing of lots of small files on the various
filesystems, and I ran into a huge difference (8x) depending on what
allocator was used for ext*. the default allocator changed between ext2
lookups.
this also means that cyrus continues to be a black box to the outside
world and you can move users from server to server without having to
reconfigure anything (it's just a simple command on the murder server(s))
David Lang
--
There are two ways of constructing a software design. One
line I've been useing at
home.
David Lang
-- Rob
On 08/21/2006 05:21 PM, David Lang wrote:
I'm working with it to copy some things currently, I'm doing it a user
at a time, and found that I needed to set --prefix2 INBOX. (note the
. ) to get things to copy properly. it looks like you may
from 2.1 to 2.3, there were a handful of messages it
didn't like (~30 out of a few hundred thousand messages) but it appears to have
worked well enough to fix the last few messages manually.
most of the errors were cases of invalid headers that 2.3 wouldn't accept, but
2.1 obviously did.
David
to configure things on a per-folder basis, possibly
with a 'no, don't allow + addressing to this folder' override.
David Lang
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
.
at least if it's arriving via the lmtp interface you have reason to believe that
it's been (somewhat) validated by your MTA.
David Lang
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing
the
messages, (but would need other permissions to check for messages, set flags,
etc)
I'll play around with things a bit while waiting for clarification.
David Lang
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http
!)
David Lang
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
. you cannot getany
more granular then that.
David Lang
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
than this, since they have no collision risk - but if you had
that many delivering you would hit the limits and start getting blank UUIDs
anyway.
does the IMAP spec specify how large a UUID can be?
David Lang
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http
and this might be an option for you but it'll be a lot of work
what you could do as a work-around is make a subfolder 'read' and configure
your
clients to move messages that have been read into that folder.
David Lang
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http
the authentication pass through the domain the user typed in.
David Lang
my cyrus.conf is
asgard dlang # cat /etc/cyrus.conf
# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/net-mail/cyrus-imapd/files/cyrus.conf,v 1.4
2004/07/18 04:02:23 dragonheart Exp $
# Standard standalone server configuration.
START
email I just wrote... but you seemed to have the basics...
if not reply all.
thanks.
David Lang
Scott
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I lost my OS drive on my home server, the mail partition was on a raid array
and survived, I have some of the rest of the config info, but it looks like I
lost
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
David Lang wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, David Lang wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Scott M. Likens wrote:
Hi,
If you have a dump of the mailbox's (ctl_mboxlist) then you can restore
those, personally I back those up weekly as well as /var/spool/imap
that have this problem don't execute any iptables
commands when running in mixed mode.
David Lang
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
allocate a
chink of ram and write to it after the fork), while on other OSs the overhead of
multiple mappings of a page will dominate.
David Lang
--On Tuesday, October 16, 2007 3:39 PM -0700 Vincent Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Omen Wild (University of California Davis)
The root
at acceptable performance on very
large databases, their code is BSD so anything relavent coudl be merged into
cyrus. it may be worth someone looking into their logic.
David Lang
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives
is
frequently larger then the OS readahead, the OS throws much of the data away
immediatly.
if we can identify the files that are the bottlenecks it would be very
interesting to see the result of puttng them on a solid-state drive.
David Lang
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu
journal ed filesystems as
alternatives to zfs and the claim that doing a fsync on one of them required
flushing the entire journal. sorry if I wasn't clear enough about this.
David Lang
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Gabor Gombas wrote:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 09:56:37AM -0800, David Lang wrote:
for cyrus you should have the same sort of requirements that you would have
for
a database server, including the fact that without a battery-backed disk
cache
(or solid state drive
a single drive failure, what I would look at
is either 3x1TB drives in raid 1, or 4x500G drives in raid 6 to get the ability
to survive 2 drives failing.
it takes long enough to rebuild an array with large drives that the chances of
a
second drive failing during the rebuild become noticable.
David
of a machine with 4 SATA drives it's the difference
between
useing the machine you have or buying a new one)
if that's not enough, what about 8 disks to 5? (6 if you do raid 6 or want a
hot-spare)
what is the point that you would consider the difference valid?
David Lang
Cyrus Home Page: http
to the actual
platfrom and I don't understand why it behaves so badly.
were you virtualized before? adding virtualization causes a fairly significant
overhead.
David Lang
We abandoned all Linux for our Cyrus Servers and switched to Solaris
10 with Zoning and ZFS. We have less concurrent
with the cyrus imapd community, perhaps your sample size is too small.
Or perhaps you're thinking of paid support? Because I know very well
that you can get that for cyrus imap.
can you provide links to where from?
David Lang
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ
of known problems for a set
of unknown problems (plus it severly limits what OS you can run, which can
bring
it's own set of problems along)
David Lang
Vincent Fox wrote:
Wesley Craig wrote:
Maildir and cyrus both suffer from the same
disadvantages (huge needs in terms of inodes etc
any good ideas, but I do disagree
with people who seem to think that ZFS is perfect, and is so much better then
any other filesystem that the availablity of ZFS should be the only
consideration on what OS to run.
David Lang
Scott
David Lang wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Scott M. Likens wrote
On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 21:12 -0700, David Lang wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, Wesley Craig wrote:
On 17 Sep 2008, at 11:40, Jens Hoffrichter wrote:
Why does cyrus need it's own
structure for the mailboxes, which is similar, but not wholly
still
running on ext3 and I definantly see it as a user in the performance.
David Lang
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
drives, you can get a good balance of
space/speed.
how do you move the cyrus* files onto other drives?
David Lang
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
backups) on a central server than on everybody's
individual desktops/laptops.
as for the concerns about laxer data security in other juristictions, that's
something that needs to be addressed when you outsource your mail (via contract
with whoever you are having host your mail for you)
David
://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/archive/mailbox.php?mailbox=archive.info-cyrus
if you send mail to a public mailing list it can be harvested by spammers.
David Lang
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu
(unless I am running something that
doesn't work with 64 bit userspace), but there the benifit is more hit-and-miss
David Lang
ATT1922831.dat
Description: ATT1922831.dat
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http
the attached messages were posted to the mulberry mailing list
short version, in order to do s/mime verification the client must retreive the
entire message to do the verification client-side.
is there any way to do this server-side?
David Lang---BeginMessage---
Hi.
I've finally identified
the fetchmail run.
David Lang
Maybe you should just eliminate fetchmail from the picture and then see
if things make more sense. Just point your MUA at the originating IMAP
server and eliminate everything in between.
If you're using an IMAP capable client, and you're using IMAP to read
your e
firewalls for years. it sounds more complicated than it is.
David Lang
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009, Greg A. Woods wrote:
At Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:54:12 +0200, Xavier Bestel xavier.bes...@free.fr wrote:
Subject: Re: Exec'ing a script from Cyrus when imapd has a client
Le mardi 20 octobre 2009 à 13:00 -0700, David Lang a écrit :
On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Greg A. Woods wrote
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009, Greg A. Woods wrote:
At Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:00:34 -0700 (PDT), David Lang
david.l...@digitalinsight.com wrote:
Subject: Re: Exec'ing a script from Cyrus when imapd has a client
as long as you are willing to limit yourself to a single MUA on a single
desktop/laptop
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Greg A. Woods wrote:
At Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT), David Lang
david.l...@digitalinsight.com wrote:
Subject: Re: Exec'ing a script from Cyrus when imapd has a client
I possibly missed it, but I didn't see anything that said that fetchmail was
grabbing things
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Xavier Bestel wrote:
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 10:07 -0700, David Lang wrote:
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009, Greg A. Woods wrote:
At Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:37:30 -0700 (PDT), David Lang
david.l...@digitalinsight.com wrote:
Subject: Re: Exec'ing a script from Cyrus when imapd has
the system accordingly.
David Lang
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu
. :-)
Thunderbird? my understanding (from watching people use it) is that it wants to
pull a copy of all your mail to the local box before processing it. how is this
a proper IMAP client?
David Lang
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Gabor Gombas wrote:
On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 11:55:25AM -0800, David Lang wrote:
Use SMTP to breech the unreliable link! It's safe, proven, and designed
for that very task!
no, SMTP only works if you have network connectivity that is up most of the
time. it will handle
disagreements.
most of the rest of us see situations where the basic approach he's doing could
be the best possible approach. we may quibble over exact details of some of the
things (use fetchmail vs UUCP vs other), but that doesn't make the basic
approach invalid.
David Lang
Cyrus Home Page: http
On Thu, 12 Nov 2009, Greg A. Woods wrote:
At Thu, 12 Nov 2009 11:55:25 -0800 (PST), David Lang
david.l...@digitalinsight.com wrote:
Subject: Re: Exec'ing a script from Cyrus when imapd has a client
no, SMTP only works if you have network connectivity that is up most of the
time
of the search
response to be able to indicate the quality of each match returned.
David Lang
On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, Bron Gondwana wrote:
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 20:01:52 -0800
From: Bron Gondwana br...@fastmail.fm
To: cyrus-de...@lists.andrew.cmu.edu, cyrus-proj...@lists.andrew.cmu.edu
Cc
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 09:56 -0800, David Lang david.l...@digitalinsight.com
wrote:
one thing that I saw mentioned elsewhere as a limitation of IMAP (and
therefor I
don't know if there is a way to address it reasonably) is the lack of a
fuzzy
search
. (it would still need a
RFC for the new mode, but does this sound like a solution to what you are
looking for?
David Lang
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
it. On the other hand this is a very fast operation on XFS.
David Lang
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010, Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:40 -0800, David Lang david.l...@digitalinsight.com
wrote:
Absolutely - two issues.
1: how to you give folders UIDs?
I thought that there was mention in your list of addressing folders by
UID for
replication purposes
any problems.
So what can I do to solve this problem?
Silly question (since I haven't been following this thread), have you checked
the subscribed status of the folders?
David Lang
Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List
not have reverse DNS properly setup (not an uncommon
situation)
David Lang
Guilherme
Em 09/09/2010, às 08:38, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) escreveu:
Guilherme Manika wrote:
This patch adds a disablereverselookups option to imapd.conf that
disables reverse DNS lookups in imapd
setup,
it depends on if your murder substatute will show you the folders across
back-ends or not in a listing.
you can always connect directly to the back-end (bypassing murder or it's
replacement) to see all other users for that back-end.
David Lang
How do you investigate users' mailboxes
I'm happy to see this.
Is there anyone packaging this up for the common linux distros?
David Lang
On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Ken Murchison wrote:
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 17:48:54 -0400
From: Ken Murchison mu...@andrew.cmu.edu
To: Cyrus Mailing List info-cyrus@lists.andrew.cmu.edu,
cyrus-annou
.
probably what's happening is that something is taking long enough that the
delivery to the subfolder 'fails' and it falls back to delivering to the main
inbox instead.
how many files do you have in the problem folders?
David Lang
Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives
On Fri, 5 Nov 2010, Ross Boylan wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
On 11/5/2010 6:18 PM, David Lang wrote:
I have a narrow question and a broader one. Narrowly, if I create some
other folders and move some of the messages into them, will it help? My
understanding is that cyrus tries to avoid
remember exactly why.
alpine and mulberry have no problem with huge numbers of messages.
David Lang
Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
20.000
messages in one folder.
the nice thing is that this is per-folder, and generally shows up as a slowdown
as you get large, so the user can just create a subfolder and move messages in
to it to work around the client issues.
This should mostly be self-regulating as a result.
David Lang
On Tue, 16 Nov 2010, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 11:25 -0800, David Lang wrote:
I don't actually know what sort of problems I'm referring to, hence the
question. The big problem I can imagine would be opendir() and
readdir() with a huge number of files in a directory
, if they are checking things
frequently, forcing them to reconnect each time will just eat up more resources.
David Lang
Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
into
some corner case that the ext4 developers just haven't run into yet, but that
the XFS developers have handled.
David Lang
Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/
List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010, Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 06:09:58PM -0800, David Lang wrote:
On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Lucas Zinato Carraro wrote:
I know that this question is controversy and there is no exact answer.
But currently what is the best file system in Linux to handle
with creating 'extra' mailboxes if
there are extra directories, it's easy enough for the user to delete them.
saying that there needs to be a message or a cyrus.* file is a huristic that
sounds like it will work most of the time, but not always.
David Lang
Cyrus Home Page: http
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011, Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 01:07:00AM +0200, Bron Gondwana wrote:
3) add the mailbox if there's a directory, don't require
cyrus.header.
4) like (3) - but check that there's at least one cyrus.* file
OR at least one message file in the directory
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
