On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Stanislav Malyshev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah? in 3.6/8 it takes three arguments on my architecture (win xp,
32bit mode with amd64). Which version do you use?
I have ICU 3.6 AFAIK. Here's a quote from unistr.h:
/**
* UChar* constructor.
*
On 10.04.2008 21:19, Michael B Allen wrote:
Can anyone recommend a method for debugging this issue?
I'd start with --enable-debug and valgrind.
It seems to be this one particular server. I have not been able to
reproduce the issue here.
What's the difference between this server and the
Aim for RC10! :D
--Jani
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 18:42 -0400, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
We are hard at work on setting an RC record with 5.2.6, with the RC5.
Nothing too unusual, this time just a few fairly trivial fixes, so I
think we are finally ready for the stable release. I'd like to ask
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, Dmitry Stogov wrote:
dmitryFri Apr 11 09:43:31 2008 UTC
Modified files: (Branch: PHP_5_3)
/php-src NEWS
/ZendEngine2 zend.c zend_execute_API.c zend_vm_def.h
zend_vm_execute.h
Log:
Optimized
Contributing miscellaneous patches like I've been sending to the internals list
in the past. :-)
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hello Matt,
I've approved your account. Now what we do for the most is giving people
limited access to the extensions they work on or so. Just let us know what
you'll be fixing next :-)
marcus
Friday, April 11, 2008, 11:18:26 AM, you wrote:
Contributing miscellaneous patches like I've been
Edin, our previous Win32 build master appears to be indisposed at the
moment hence lack of win32 binaries. If someone else wants to produce
them great, if not, we'll go on without them.
On 11-Apr-08, at 8:17 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:14 PM, John Mertic [EMAIL
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Ilia Alshanetsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Edin, our previous Win32 build master appears to be indisposed at the moment
hence lack of win32 binaries. If someone else wants to produce them great,
if not, we'll go on without them.
We will manage to provide.
On Apr 11, 2008, at 8:29 AM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote:
Edin, our previous Win32 build master appears to be indisposed at
the moment hence lack of win32 binaries. If someone else wants to
produce them great, if not, we'll go on without them.
I'd be willing to take a bash at it. What's
Hi Marcus,
Thanks! Well, I don't have a specific extension to work on, just been
random stuff that I found to change in core PHP (so ZendEngine2/ and
different areas of php-src/), as anyone who's seen my different patches
could probably see. :-) So I don't know... I figured things wouldn't be
Thanks everyone!
I'd like to provide some help too with getting the the MSI installers
built. Especially on snaps.php.net where we haven't had a successful
MSI build in over 2 months ( some permissions issues ) and I know
there are some fixes for Vista and FastCGI configuration problems
solved.
Hi Gwynne,
I'd be willing to take a bash at it. What's required? I have access to a
Windows XP SP2 machine.
MSVC 6.0 - and up to date libraries for everything, which would be my
personal stumbling block right now. Elizabeth's probably best-placed to deal
with it, if she has time.
- Steph
Hi,
A quick update on Phar's API for those who are keeping score:
1) Phar-isWritable() now works properly and does what Liz was hoping:
tells you whether you can actually modify the phar archive by looking at
the archive's file perms as well as phar.readonly
2) PharFileInfo-getContent() added to
Have snapshots disappeared too? Just grab the latest snapshot and you
have the RC..
--Jani
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 08:53 -0400, John Mertic wrote:
Thanks everyone!
I'd like to provide some help too with getting the the MSI installers
built. Especially on snaps.php.net where we haven't had a
Steph Fox wrote:
Hi Gwynne,
I'd be willing to take a bash at it. What's required? I have access
to a Windows XP SP2 machine.
MSVC 6.0 - and up to date libraries for everything, which would be my
personal stumbling block right now. Elizabeth's probably best-placed to
deal with it, if she
Elizabeth M Smith escreveu:
Steph Fox wrote:
Hi Gwynne,
I'd be willing to take a bash at it. What's required? I have access
to a Windows XP SP2 machine.
MSVC 6.0 - and up to date libraries for everything, which would be my
personal stumbling block right now. Elizabeth's probably best-placed
I can do the builds until Edin appears - however before I roll the RC -
what libs need to be upgraded for windows? Speak now or wait until the
next release ;)
Everything libxml...
http://ctindustries.net/libxml/
- Steph
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To
Hi I can compile and test RC5 on windows.
What extensions should be enable when compiling to test on windows ?
Should all possible extenstions be compiled as shared ?
Steph Fox wrote:
I can do the builds until Edin appears - however before I roll the RC -
what libs need to be upgraded for
Hi,
Rui wrote:
Elizabeth M Smith escreveu:
Steph Fox wrote:
Hi Gwynne,
I'd be willing to take a bash at it. What's required? I have access
to a Windows XP SP2 machine.
MSVC 6.0 - and up to date libraries for everything, which would be my
personal stumbling block right now. Elizabeth's
I noticed, that http://www.php.net/~helly/php/ext/spl/ was updated
almost a year ago. Is the newer version available anywhere?
--
Alexey Zakhlestin
http://blog.milkfarmsoft.com/
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
On 11/04/2008, Alexey Zakhlestin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I noticed, that http://www.php.net/~helly/php/ext/spl/ was updated
almost a year ago. Is the newer version available anywhere?
Good point, there're so many new things in there. Marcus? Etienne?
Anyone up to do regenerate some docs ?
On 4/11/08, Antony Dovgal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10.04.2008 21:19, Michael B Allen wrote:
Can anyone recommend a method for debugging this issue?
I'd start with --enable-debug and valgrind.
It seems to be this one particular server. I have not been able to
reproduce the issue
Hi,
I've a more recent build that covers DLLists, but only Marcus is able to
upload it to ~helly.
I guess a new version will be online as soon as I finish documenting Heaps
and priority queues.
Regards
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 5:42 PM, David Coallier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 11/04/2008,
On 11/04/2008, Alexey Zakhlestin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I noticed, that http://www.php.net/~helly/php/ext/spl/http://www.php.net/%7Ehelly/php/ext/spl/
was updated
almost a year ago. Is the newer version available anywhere?
Good point, there're so many new things in there. Marcus?
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Elizabeth M Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steph Fox wrote:
Hi Gwynne,
I'd be willing to take a bash at it. What's required? I have access
to a Windows XP SP2 machine.
MSVC 6.0 - and up to date libraries for everything, which would be my
Hi Derick,
Sorry, but I think mainly about PHP performance, and of course I didn't
know that you trace return_values it in xdebug.
After the patch, in case if return value is not used we set
EG(return_value_ptr_ptr) to NULL before call to nested execute().
I assume you can just check for
I think all effort should go into writing real documentation within the
phpdoc cvs module instead of unreadable and unofficial doxygen output.
Personally I feel the link to the doxygen output should be removed from
php.net/spl (but won't) so anyway those are my feelings. Etienne is planning
Which VC do you use?
VS 2005.
--
Stanislav Malyshev, Zend Software Architect
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.zend.com/
(408)253-8829 MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hi!
I think all effort should go into writing real documentation within the
phpdoc cvs module instead of unreadable and unofficial doxygen output.
I think having core module that is documented by doxygen is a shame. And
if there's anybody working on docs, the work should be done first on
I think having core module that is documented by doxygen is a shame. And if
there's anybody working on docs, the work should be done first on official
docs in the manual, which right now are in the virtually non-existent
state. Doxygen is a nice thing but no replacement for real
David Coallier wrote:
The only thing that Alexey asked was if there was some regenerated
docs. Please, if you feel like you still have problems with SPL in the
core or any other problems with documentation of extensions because of
it's documentation, just start another thread. This one should be
I have been wondering the answer to this question for a while now. A LOT
of stuff has been backported from PHP 6 to PHP 5.3. So much in fact, why
don't you just call PHP 5.3 version 6?
What major new features are left for PHP 6? The big one I can think of
is unicode support and dropping some
On 11.04.2008, at 21:30, Ryan Panning wrote:
I have been wondering the answer to this question for a while now. A
LOT of stuff has been backported from PHP 6 to PHP 5.3. So much in
fact, why don't you just call PHP 5.3 version 6?
What major new features are left for PHP 6? The big one I
Sorry, guess I need to write a new message instead of replying with a
different subject.
David Coallier wrote:
The only thing that Alexey asked was if there was some regenerated
docs. Please, if you feel like you still have problems with SPL in the
core or any other problems with
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Native unicode is not big enough for you?
regards,
Lukas
If you're looking for good PR and reviews, no. I think if you have very
limited new features, the people writing reviews are going to say PHP 6
doesn't have much new and not worth the upgrade. IMO
Honestly,
On 11.04.2008, at 21:41, Ryan Panning wrote:
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Native unicode is not big enough for you?
regards,
Lukas
If you're looking for good PR and reviews, no. I think if you have
very limited new features, the people writing reviews are going to
say PHP 6 doesn't have much
Lukas Kahwe Smith:
On 11.04.2008, at 21:41, Ryan Panning wrote:
Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Native unicode is not big enough for you?
regards,
Lukas
If you're looking for good PR and reviews, no. I think if you have
very limited new features, the people writing reviews are going to
I've compiled with all extensions I use on my project.
phpinfo()
PHP Version = 5.2.6RC5
System = Windows NT JARISMAR 5.1 build 2600
Build Date = Apr 11 2008 15:50:57
=
TEST RESULT SUMMARY
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 16:07 -0400, (Wietse Venema) wrote:
According statistics at nexen.net, PHP4 is now 68% of the installed
base (8 years of deployment) and PHP5 is 32% (almost 4 years). The
lesson I draw from this is that a major release every couple years
would heavily fragment the
Johannes Schl?ter:
Hi,
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 16:07 -0400, (Wietse Venema) wrote:
According statistics at nexen.net, PHP4 is now 68% of the installed
base (8 years of deployment) and PHP5 is 32% (almost 4 years). The
lesson I draw from this is that a major release every couple years
Philip Olson wrote:
On 11/04/2008, Alexey Zakhlestin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I noticed, that
http://www.php.net/~helly/php/ext/spl/http://www.php.net/%7Ehelly/php/ext/spl/was
updated
almost a year ago. Is the newer version available anywhere?
Good point, there're so many new things in
On 12.04.2008 00:07, Wietse Venema wrote:
According statistics at nexen.net, PHP4 is now 68% of the installed
base (8 years of deployment) and PHP5 is 32% (almost 4 years). The
lesson I draw from this is that a major release every couple years
would heavily fragment the installed base, and
On 11.04.2008 23:30, Ryan Panning wrote:
I have been wondering the answer to this question for a while now. A LOT
of stuff has been backported from PHP 6 to PHP 5.3. So much in fact, why
don't you just call PHP 5.3 version 6?
What major new features are left for PHP 6? The big one I can think
On 11.04.2008 23:09, Ryan Panning wrote:
David Coallier wrote:
The only thing that Alexey asked was if there was some regenerated
docs. Please, if you feel like you still have problems with SPL in the
core or any other problems with documentation of extensions because of
it's documentation,
I'm thinking there must be a bug in the heart of php
causing this. I'll debug it, but I haven't looked at
php source code in a few years and would like a tip as
to which files are involved in evaluating ==. Here
is a fragment from my code and the output:
...
print pre\n;
var_dump($max);
There is no bug here. Please read:
http://docs.sun.com/source/806-3568/ncg_goldberg.html
-Rasmus
Todd Ruth wrote:
I'm thinking there must be a bug in the heart of php
causing this. I'll debug it, but I haven't looked at
php source code in a few years and would like a tip as
to which files
46 matches
Mail list logo
