On Thursday 14 August 2008 12:36:29 am Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Larry Garfield wrote:
I would also note that include up front and have a good autoload scheme
works great if you are writing all classes. If you're trying to use
namespaces and functions, there is no autoload. That makes the
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 03:35, Daniel Convissor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 06:32:37PM +0400, Antony Dovgal wrote:
On 13.08.2008 17:51, Daniel Convissor wrote:
43817 is definitely a regression bug. Things worked correctly in 5.2.1
and then got broken in 5.2.2.
Merging
Larry Garfield wrote:
On Thursday 14 August 2008 12:36:29 am Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
Larry Garfield wrote:
I would also note that include up front and have a good autoload scheme
works great if you are writing all classes. If you're trying to use
namespaces and functions, there is no autoload.
For better or worse 99% of the code I write runs on systems without an
opcode
cache 99% of the time so that's what I optimize for. That it is
apparently
impossible to optimize for both opcode caching and non-opcode caching
environments at the same time (the former hates conditional include,
On Thursday 14 August 2008 2:08:23 am Stan Vassilev | FM wrote:
For better or worse 99% of the code I write runs on systems without an
opcode
cache 99% of the time so that's what I optimize for. That it is
apparently
impossible to optimize for both opcode caching and non-opcode caching
Hello Stanislav,
Thursday, August 14, 2008, 12:25:35 AM, you wrote:
Hi!
I think Marcus is talking about files that are included that do not
specify a namespace explicitly. In this situation the context does matter.
No it does not. Would anybody check what they are talking about before
Hello Guilherme,
Thursday, August 14, 2008, 3:37:17 AM, you wrote:
I read parts of the thread and I'm curious about a situation that
seems Marcus' patch will deny.
It seems that it'll be denied the possibility to require/include a
file inside of a method of a class/function inside a
Hello Rasmus,
Thursday, August 14, 2008, 7:36:29 AM, you wrote:
Larry Garfield wrote:
I would also note that include up front and have a good autoload scheme
works great if you are writing all classes. If you're trying to use
namespaces and functions, there is no autoload. That makes the
Hi Hannes:
Doesn't look like there will be a new 5.2 release any time soon
I've heard THAT one before. :)
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M P A N Y
data intensive web and database programming
http://www.AnalysisAndSolutions.com/
Hi!
Start with yourself by checking out Zend/tests/ns_069.phpt and then come
back if you see no problem there. Since I am sure you will ignore the
issue here goes anyway.
I do not see any problem there, right.
The included file has a different scope. Hence a lot of stuff like
reflection
What do you mean are file-local?! So if I have a B.php, that includes
A.php, and in A.php I have a namespace called Foo, I can't call a function
from that namespace like Foo::someFunc () unless I call it from A.php?! So a
Foo:someFunc () from B.php would be illegal? Cause if you're suggesting
Marcus Boerger wrote:
Hello Rasmus,
Thursday, August 14, 2008, 7:36:29 AM, you wrote:
Larry Garfield wrote:
I would also note that include up front and have a good autoload scheme
works great if you are writing all classes. If you're trying to use
namespaces and functions, there is no
Hi,
At first time, it was a bug in the useful xdebug, and I follow it to
the PHP code http://bugs.xdebug.org/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=340.
When exception::$message, exception::$line are not of the initial
type, it segfaults (for strings) or display non-predictible data. The
next
Hello Lupus,
Thursday, August 14, 2008, 8:42:23 PM, you wrote:
Hi,
At first time, it was a bug in the useful xdebug, and I follow it to
the PHP code http://bugs.xdebug.org/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=340.
When exception::$message, exception::$line are not of the initial
type,
Hello Marcus,
Thursday, August 14, 2008, 9:17:34 PM, you wrote:
Hello Lupus,
Thursday, August 14, 2008, 8:42:23 PM, you wrote:
Hi,
At first time, it was a bug in the useful xdebug, and I follow it to
the PHP code http://bugs.xdebug.org/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=340.
When
Em Qui, 2008-08-14 às 21:18 +0200, Marcus Boerger escreveu:
Hello Marcus,
Thursday, August 14, 2008, 9:17:34 PM, you wrote:
Hello Lupus,
Thursday, August 14, 2008, 8:42:23 PM, you wrote:
Hi,
At first time, it was a bug in the useful xdebug, and I follow it to
the PHP
Marcus Boerger a écrit :
Thanks for letting us know. Can you provide the diff using 'cvs di -uwp'.
I'll do it in the future. Sorry for the inconvenient, I didn't found
what you're waiting for. So, I did a simple diff :)
Thanks to you and Felipe.
--
Mickaël Wolff aka Lupus Michaelis
Hello internals,
I use following configure script to build PHP 5.3.0alpha2-dev:
#! /bin/sh
#
# Created by configure
'./configure' \
'--with-apxs2=/usr/local/apache/current/bin/apxs' \
'--with-config-file-path=/etc' \
'--enable-maintainer-zts' \
$@
With this config (here's my real one:
Hi,
on the member side, there is __get, __set, __isset and __unset - on the
method side, there is __call (and now: __callstatic). I was wondering why
there was no __getstatic and friends, but failed to find a reason.
Attached you'll find an incomplete patch against PHP_5_3 to add this
Hi again,
Attached you'll find an incomplete patch against PHP_5_3 to add this
functionality. If you like it let me know and I can finish it.
Darn, seems the list didn't like my text/plain attachment. Well, here we go:
http://sitten-polizei.de/php/get-static.diff
- Timm
--
PHP
On Thursday 14 August 2008 02:59:48 Arnaud Le Blanc wrote:
Hi,
I made some changes to the patch:
http://arnaud.lb.s3.amazonaws.com/php-5.3.0-alarms-0808141122.patch
- Apache effectively seems to resets the signals after MINIT, so original
handlers are now saved in RINIT in the first
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Timm Friebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi again,
Attached you'll find an incomplete patch against PHP_5_3 to add this
functionality. If you like it let me know and I can finish it.
Darn, seems the list didn't like my text/plain attachment. Well, here we
go:
Nathan Nobbe wrote:
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 4:44 PM, Timm Friebe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi again,
Attached you'll find an incomplete patch against PHP_5_3 to add this
functionality. If you like it let me know and I can finish it.
Darn, seems the list didn't like my text/plain
23 matches
Mail list logo
