Hi Nikita,
Very good list, thank you.
The only one I am totally not sure about is image(filled)polygon
$numpoints. There are really tons of codes out there using it. There
is little to no gain to remove it but create a load of 1st level
support requests to many packages and applications. A
En mar, 29 jun 2021 21:33:19 +0200 Michał Marcin Brzuchalski
escribió
> Hi Manuel,
> I think a Markdown document including PHP code snippet with above examples
> could cause issues while parsing.
> I can imagine parsers don't expect end-of-snippet tag "```" being not an
> end tag
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 12:05 PM Larry Garfield wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2021, at 1:00 PM, Larry Garfield wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 29, 2021, at 12:30 PM, Guilliam Xavier wrote:
> > > (Extracted from the "Pipe Operator, take 2" thread)
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 12:54 AM Larry Garfield
>
Hi Manuel,
wt., 29 cze 2021 o 18:16 Manuel Canga napisał(a):
> Hi, folks, here again with a new purpose: ``` as alternative to Nowdoc
> syntax.
>
> Currently, Nowdoc syntax is very "verbose":
>
> $string =<<<'CODE'
>
> Link: '%s'
>
> CODE;
>
> Why doesn't something like this?:
>
> $string
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021, at 1:00 PM, Larry Garfield wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2021, at 12:30 PM, Guilliam Xavier wrote:
> > (Extracted from the "Pipe Operator, take 2" thread)
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 12:54 AM Larry Garfield
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021, at 5:30 PM, Olle
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021, at 12:30 PM, Guilliam Xavier wrote:
> (Extracted from the "Pipe Operator, take 2" thread)
>
> On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 12:54 AM Larry Garfield
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 28, 2021, at 5:30 PM, Olle Härstedt wrote:
> >
> > > Would a slimmed down version have more support? How
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 11:04 AM Côme Chilliet <
come.chill...@fusiondirectory.org> wrote:
> Le Thu, 17 Jun 2021 08:30:43 -0500,
> "Larry Garfield" a écrit :
> > > > The ? character was chosen for the placeholder largely because it was
> > > > unambiguous and easy to implement. Prior, similar
(Extracted from the "Pipe Operator, take 2" thread)
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 12:54 AM Larry Garfield
wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021, at 5:30 PM, Olle Härstedt wrote:
>
> > Would a slimmed down version have more support? How about removing the
> > variadic operator, and let the user manually add
En mar, 29 jun 2021 18:40:05 +0200 Rowan Tommins
escribió
>
> The big advantage of heredoc and nowdoc syntax is that you can choose
> the delimiter to be something that you know won't occur in the string.
> For instance:
>
> $markdown = <<<'MD'
> PHP has lots of ways to
On 29/06/2021 17:15, Manuel Canga wrote:
Hi, folks, here again with a new purpose: ``` as alternative to Nowdoc syntax.
Currently, Nowdoc syntax is very "verbose":
$string =<<<'CODE'
Link: '%s'
CODE;
The big advantage of heredoc and nowdoc syntax is that you can choose
the delimiter to
Hi, folks, here again with a new purpose: ``` as alternative to Nowdoc syntax.
Currently, Nowdoc syntax is very "verbose":
$string =<<<'CODE'
Link: '%s'
CODE;
Why doesn't something like this?:
$string =```
Link: '%s'
```;
even as well:
$string =```Link: '%s'```;
I see a caveat: this
On Thu, Jun 24, 2021 at 1:20 AM Sara Golemon wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 5:02 PM Kamil Tekiela
> wrote:
>
> > I would like to propose a new simple RFC that aims to add a new function
> > called parse_query_string as an alternative to parse_str.
> >
> >
On Sat, Jun 26, 2021 at 2:40 AM Go Kudo wrote:
> Hello Internals.
>
> RFC has been reorganized for finalization.
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/rng_extension
>
> The changes from the previous version are as follows:
>
> - Changed again to a class-based approach. The argument can be omitted, in
>
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021, at 8:08 AM, Nikita Popov wrote:
> > You might not like the boilerplate, but that just works.
> >
> > Can this be considered Nikita?
> >
>
> Well, it's a nifty hack :) I don't think this is the solution we want to
> encourage though. It requires you pass extra information
Le 29/06/2021 à 15:08, Nikita Popov a écrit :
Well, it's a nifty hack :) I don't think this is the solution we want to
encourage though. It requires you pass extra information through a
side-channel -- I think I'd rather not use readonly than write that code.
Continuing along the same line, one
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 10:36 AM Nikita Popov wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 2:48 PM Nikita Popov wrote:
>
>> Hi internals,
>>
>> I'd like to present an RFC for a first-class callable syntax, which is
>> intended as a simpler alternative to the partial function application (PFA)
>> proposal:
On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 9:14 AM Nicolas Grekas
wrote:
> Le lun. 28 juin 2021 à 18:22, Larry Garfield a
>>> écrit :
>>>
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021, at 11:17 AM, Nicolas Grekas wrote:
> > > I'd like to open the discussion on readonly properties:
> > >
Le Thu, 17 Jun 2021 08:30:43 -0500,
"Larry Garfield" a écrit :
> > > The ? character was chosen for the placeholder largely because it was
> > > unambiguous and easy to implement. Prior, similar RFCs (such as the
> > > original Pipe Operator proposal from several years ago) used the $$
> > >
2021-05-20 14:48 GMT+02:00, Nikita Popov :
> Hi internals,
>
> I'd like to present an RFC for a first-class callable syntax, which is
> intended as a simpler alternative to the partial function application (PFA)
> proposal:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/first_class_callable_syntax
>
> See the
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 2:48 PM Nikita Popov wrote:
> Hi internals,
>
> I'd like to present an RFC for a first-class callable syntax, which is
> intended as a simpler alternative to the partial function application (PFA)
> proposal:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/first_class_callable_syntax
>
>
Hi!
Would anyone else be in favor of reusing the user_agent setting for cURL
despite the BC break?
At the moment all possibilities (user_agent, curl.user_agent (PHP_INI_ALL),
curl.user_agent (PHP_INI_SYSTEM)) seem to have negative votes attached.
I am unsure if it makes sense to go forward with
2021-06-29 0:54 GMT+02:00, Larry Garfield :
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021, at 5:30 PM, Olle Härstedt wrote:
>
>> Mm. Assoc arrays are by now known to be not so good. I hope...
>
> There are millions of PHP sites build on anonymous arrays today.
>
>> OCaml is strictly evaluated, not lazy like Haskell. So
>
> Le lun. 28 juin 2021 à 18:22, Larry Garfield a
>> écrit :
>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 28, 2021, at 11:17 AM, Nicolas Grekas wrote:
>>> > > > I'd like to open the discussion on readonly properties:
>>> > > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/readonly_properties_v2
>>> > > >
>>> > > > This proposal is similar to
23 matches
Mail list logo
