Hi Flávio
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 12:17 PM Flávio Heleno
wrote:
>> > I recently discovered some unfortunate behavior of the coalesce
>> > assignment operator (??=) in combination with function calls.
>
> Great catch Ilija!
>
> Do you mind sharing how did you stumble upon it?
Oh, it's
Ben Ramsey in php.internals (Wed, 5 Jul 2023 10:44:12 -0500):
>> On Jun 13, 2023, at 15:06, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
>>
>> Hi Christoph,
>>
snip
>>>
>>> So, if there are no unforeseen problems, I suggest to build PHP
>>> 8.1.16RC1 with OpenSSL 3.0 (PHP 8.1.15RC1 has already been built with
>>>
Hey Fabio,
On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 at 18:14, Fabio Carpi wrote:
> I'm new here on the list... Hello everyone!
>
> I use ::class sometimes to check some classes, but it works with any
> keyword, even if the class doesn't exist.
> The IDE doesn't show the error, and I only detect the error when the
>
I'm new here on the list... Hello everyone!
I use ::class sometimes to check some classes, but it works with any keyword,
even if the class doesn't exist.
The IDE doesn't show the error, and I only detect the error when the specific
piece of code is running...
> On Jun 13, 2023, at 15:06, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
>
> Hi Christoph,
>
> "Christoph M. Becker" in php.internals (Wed, 18 Jan 2023 13:20:41 +0100):
>> While the official builds for PHP 8.2 already use OpenSSL 3.0, the PHP
>> 8.1 builds are still using OpenSSL 1.1.1. However, OpenSSL 1.1.1 is
>>
On Wed, 5 Jul 2023 at 01:36, Kalle Sommer Nielsen wrote:
> Hi Nuno
>
> Den tirs. 4. jul. 2023 kl. 22.30 skrev Nuno Maduro >:
> >
> > Hi Internals,
> >
> > I am writing to request karma privileges to vote on PHP RFCs.
> >
> > For those who don't know me, my name is Nuno Maduro
> >
Great catch Ilija!
Do you mind sharing how did you stumble upon it?
Thank you!
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023, 06:31 Dmitry Stogov wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 1:15 AM Ilija Tovilo
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone
> >
> > I recently discovered some unfortunate behavior of the coalesce
> > assignment
On Wed, Jul 5, 2023 at 1:15 AM Ilija Tovilo wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> I recently discovered some unfortunate behavior of the coalesce
> assignment operator (??=) in combination with function calls. Here's
> the TL;DR:
>
> foo()['bar'] ??= 42;
>
> Currently, this code calls foo() twice. This seems
