On 22 March 2015 at 08:54, Patrick Schaaf p...@bof.de wrote:
Okay, that's easier to implement and probably sufficient, if everybody
play nice. Or, another idea and maybe a lot less work to implement: all
active release managers could have a want a vote button on pending RFC
pages.
+1 on RM
On 22 March 2015 at 07:00, Patrick Schaaf p...@bof.de wrote:
Hmm. Is that really the line to be drawn? An RFC, by itself, provides a
good point to spell out a change clearly, and anchor it for reference in
discussion. Discussion on internals itself cannot provide that, it is too
scattered,
Am 22.03.2015 09:45 schrieb Leigh lei...@gmail.com:
On 22 March 2015 at 07:00, Patrick Schaaf p...@bof.de wrote:
Hmm. Is that really the line to be drawn? An RFC, by itself, provides a
good point to spell out a change clearly, and anchor it for reference in
discussion. Discussion on internals
On 22/03/15 08:54, Patrick Schaaf wrote:
Sure, I can agree on RFC all the things.
Probably not all things, but surely everything visible at the language
level, that would need documentation. Syntax, functions, function argument
changes. Probably also changes of official C level API for module
On Mar 22, 2015 3:45 PM, Leigh lei...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 March 2015 at 07:00, Patrick Schaaf p...@bof.de wrote:
Hmm. Is that really the line to be drawn? An RFC, by itself, provides a
good point to spell out a change clearly, and anchor it for reference in
discussion. Discussion on
Am 22.03.2015 02:30 schrieb Leigh lei...@gmail.com:
Yep, this does look like another case of simply ignoring rules. The fact
that what does and does not require an RFC does not help, this probably
didn't need one, however one was created and the rules need to be stuck
to.
Hmm. Is that really
On Mar 22, 2015 2:01 PM, Patrick Schaaf p...@bof.de wrote:
Am 22.03.2015 02:30 schrieb Leigh lei...@gmail.com:
Yep, this does look like another case of simply ignoring rules. The fact
that what does and does not require an RFC does not help, this probably
didn't need one, however one was
Hey:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Xinchen Hui larue...@php.net wrote:
Hey:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Alain Williams a...@phcomp.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:46:58PM +1100, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Wei Dai zxcvda...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On 21 March 2015 at 08:14, Xinchen Hui larue...@php.net wrote:
Hey:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Xinchen Hui larue...@php.net wrote:
Hey:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Alain Williams a...@phcomp.co.uk
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:46:58PM +1100, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Fri,
I also had a question! Didn't you noticed it?
Am 20.03.2015 um 16:49 schrieb Marc Bennewitz:
Why not simply allow the callback to be an array, too?
Marc
Am 21.03.2015 um 09:14 schrieb Xinchen Hui:
Hey:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Xinchen Hui larue...@php.net wrote:
Hey:
On Fri, Mar
Hi,
2015-03-21 19:30 GMT+01:00 Marc Bennewitz dev@mabe.berlin:
I also had a question! Didn't you noticed it?
Am 20.03.2015 um 16:49 schrieb Marc Bennewitz:
Why not simply allow the callback to be an array, too?
Because arrays are valid callbacks. [$object, 'cb'] would call the the
'cb'
On 21 March 2015 at 12:30, Peter Cowburn petercowb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 March 2015 at 08:14, Xinchen Hui larue...@php.net wrote:
Hey:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 9:14 PM, Xinchen Hui larue...@php.net wrote:
Hey:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Alain Williams a...@phcomp.co.uk
Hi internals,
Hi internals,
The RFC to add a user-land function for an easy-to-use and reliable
preg_replace_callback_array() in PHP is up for discussion:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/preg_replace_callback_array
This proposes adding one function: `preg_replace_callback_array()` that
is
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Wei Dai zxcvda...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi internals,
Hi internals,
The RFC to add a user-land function for an easy-to-use and reliable
preg_replace_callback_array() in PHP is up for discussion:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/preg_replace_callback_array
This proposes
Hey:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Alain Williams a...@phcomp.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:46:58PM +1100, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Wei Dai zxcvda...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi internals,
Hi internals,
The RFC to add a user-land function for an
Am 20.03.2015 um 09:03 schrieb Wei Dai:
Hi internals,
Hi internals,
The RFC to add a user-land function for an easy-to-use and reliable
preg_replace_callback_array() in PHP is up for discussion:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/preg_replace_callback_array
This proposes adding one function:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 10:46:58PM +1100, Pierre Joye wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Wei Dai zxcvda...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi internals,
Hi internals,
The RFC to add a user-land function for an easy-to-use and reliable
preg_replace_callback_array() in PHP is up for discussion:
17 matches
Mail list logo
