Re: [IRCA] [ABDX] 1710 possible

2015-09-28 Thread George Sherman via IRCA
--- Begin Message --- I tried 1710 just before sunrise & nothing, yet 1610 further east was still in. I noticed their website said the coverage of these transmitters was a shorter distance than what a cell phone tower could provide, so 100mw possible. I don't have outside antennas right now.

Re: [IRCA] [ABDX] 1710 possible

2015-09-27 Thread Les Rayburn
A Part 15 signal on 1710 KHz in the US would be illegal regardless of power level, correct? If I'm not mistaken, Part 15 only allows transmissions up to 1705 KHz. Many amateurs operated Part 15 CW beacons on LF frequencies in the 1980's and 90's called "Lowfer" beacons. We also deployed Part

Re: [IRCA] [ABDX] 1710 possible

2015-09-27 Thread neilkaz
Their website has a link for streamed audio which I checked and it works. If a part 15, perhaps they are running more than legal part 15 power as I suspect a few here in the US do. Your noise floor with the DKAZ aimed N is so low, that getting a part 15 via skip wouldn't shock me. 73 KAZ

Re: [IRCA] [ABDX] 1710 possible

2015-09-27 Thread Tim Tromp
Mystery solved. With a little help from some underground radio friends, I've learned this was a test transmission originating somewhere around Timmins, Ontario (roughly 480 miles NNE). The transmitter was 35 watts into an inverted L antenna. The testing is for CHIM-FM's future 1710 transmitter