[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13244206#comment-13244206
]
Gary D. Gregory commented on CODEC-96:
--
OK, I see the Clirr errors now after applying
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13244472#comment-13244472
]
Sebb commented on CODEC-96:
---
The mark/reset patch should really be on a separate JIRA, as it is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13243740#comment-13243740
]
Gary D. Gregory commented on CODEC-96:
--
The patch CODEX-96-2.patch applies cleanly on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13243742#comment-13243742
]
Sebb commented on CODEC-96:
---
codec-96-3rd-attempt.patch is very old (2010). I think it can be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13240530#comment-13240530
]
Thomas Neidhart commented on CODEC-96:
--
I have reviewed the patch, which looks good in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13240542#comment-13240542
]
Sebb commented on CODEC-96:
---
bq. BaseNCodec has a member xcontext which is never used
Sorry, looks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13240566#comment-13240566
]
Thomas Neidhart commented on CODEC-96:
--
{quote}
That's a separate issue; this patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13233310#comment-13233310
]
Jochen Wiedmann commented on CODEC-96:
--
I agree with Henri: Document the facts and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13233362#comment-13233362
]
Sebb commented on CODEC-96:
---
I think it might be possible to move the mutable fields out of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13234003#comment-13234003
]
Sebb commented on CODEC-96:
---
I've got a prototype which passes all the tests.
Basically I put all
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13233234#comment-13233234
]
Matt Ryall commented on CODEC-96:
-
I'm happy to have it resolved if there's Javadoc saying
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12851037#action_12851037
]
Jochen Wiedmann commented on CODEC-96:
--
Excuse me, but have an instance create another
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12850769#action_12850769
]
Matt Ryall commented on CODEC-96:
-
Patch looks to me like it would work. Unfortunately, I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12838758#action_12838758
]
Jochen Wiedmann commented on CODEC-96:
--
The problem is not in the Base64 code, but in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CODEC-96?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12838924#action_12838924
]
Julius Davies commented on CODEC-96:
I agree I should have documented (or even thought
15 matches
Mail list logo