Re: [JAVA2D] Retiring the package com.sun.image.codec.jpeg

2007-04-25 Thread java2d
I would vote for #1 - get rid of the classes entirely in Java 7. The warning is already out there when compiling in Java 6.. there is no sense in dragging it on. I would also vote for rewriting the JPEG loaders in Image I/O as they are quite poor performance-wise (and so is

Re: [JAVA2D] Retiring the package com.sun.image.codec.jpeg

2007-04-12 Thread java2d
My results are 18,250ms for ImageIO and 15,172 for JpegEncode. I will try to make a more thorough test and will try JAI. Thank, Carl [Message sent by forum member 'carcour' (carcour)] http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?messageID=212065

Re: [JAVA2D] Retiring the package com.sun.image.codec.jpeg

2007-04-11 Thread Phil Race
I received the test image from Carl and it does have an APP2 marker with an ICC profile so its as I suspected. com.sun.image.codec.jpeg is faster mainly because its not processing this. On my XP PC for 50 loads of the sample image I have ImageIO : 32 seconds JPEGDecoder : 13 seconds But if I

Re: [JAVA2D] Retiring the package com.sun.image.codec.jpeg

2007-04-11 Thread java2d
Thanks Phil. I tried it. It it is a faster but not as fast as the old library. It still looks to me that at 400ms this is slow. Shouldn't it be possible to make a multi threaded image reader. Do you know what is really taking most of this time? I have read somewhere that the C library used is

Re: [JAVA2D] Retiring the package com.sun.image.codec.jpeg

2007-04-11 Thread Phil Race
I tried it. what is the percentage differential you measure? I trust you ran a benchmark which ran a loop of (say) 50 times? I have read somewhere that the C library used is not efficient and that the Intel library is faster. no idea what that's about. Both APIs use the same C lib. Its the IJG

Re: [JAVA2D] Retiring the package com.sun.image.codec.jpeg

2007-04-10 Thread Phil Race
There may be some differences in the way that the two APIs process the image. For example I noted recently that the old com.sun.image.codec,jpeg is completely ignorant of an APP2 marker with an ICC profile in which case its faster, but produces incorrect results. So for many photographic images

Re: [JAVA2D] Retiring the package com.sun.image.codec.jpeg

2007-04-09 Thread java2d
I've run some tests and concluded that JPEGCodec.createJPEGDecoder(new FileInputStream(file)).decodeAsBufferedImage() is faster than ImageIO.read(new File(file)) . I have a test image that's 1978x2500 that loads in 375ms using JPEGCodec and 735 ms using ImageIO. I set

[JAVA2D] Retiring the package com.sun.image.codec.jpeg

2007-02-22 Thread Phil Race
The package com.sun.image.codec.jpeg was added in JDK 1.2 (Dec 1998) as a non-standard way of controlling the loading and saving of JPEG format image files. It has never been part of the platform specification and is not part of any compatibility test suite and so compatible Java implementations