AW: [JBoss-dev] [JBoss.net] - JBoss.net HTTP Basic Authentication problem

2004-02-03 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Hi Curt, From http://www.jboss.org/developers/guides/jboss.net/security p Hint: Some web service implementations, such as the M$ Soap Toolkit do not send basic authentication data until the server will present them a 401 message. To ensure that the JBossAuthenticationHandler will not route an

AW: [JBoss-dev] Cvs head build error

2004-02-02 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Shame on me and incremental recompilation through Eclipse! Sorry, CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Scott M Stark Gesendet: Freitag, 30. Januar 2004 21:43 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: RE: [JBoss-dev] Cvs head build error I

AW: [JBoss-dev] WSDL generation broken in =3.2.2?

2004-01-26 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Marek, How does the wsdl look like under 3.0.6 or 3.2.1? There is indeed some jboss.net specific code that builds service meta-data from the JMX introspection API, but this code should just drive the Axis WSDL-Emitter (which then generates the seemingly invalid xsd fragment). CGJ

AW: [JBoss-dev] Playing a part in the JBoss development effort

2003-12-03 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Get a sourceforge account and subscribe to the mailing-list on the http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/jboss page (there is also the description of how to access the cvs and the list of open tasks). Best, CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Meghshyam Jagannath [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[JBoss-dev] AW: Security in JBoss.net

2003-12-02 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
x-posting to jboss-dev/scott in order to get the community/security specialists up-to-date. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jason Essington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 2. Dezember 2003 01:08 An: Dr.Christoph Jung; Thomas Diesler Betreff: Security in JBoss.net Hi

AW: [JBoss-dev] WebServer: howto obtain the host and port generic ally

2003-11-25 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Thomas Diesler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Montag, 24. November 2003 15:12 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: RE: [JBoss-dev] WebServer: howto obtain the host and port generically Hallo Christoph, do we realy? In case of JSR109 is it not

AW: [JBoss-dev] WebServer: howto obtain the host and port generic ally

2003-11-24 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
somebody needs it'. I thought, I share this one :-) -thomas -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jung , Dr. Christoph Sent: Freitag, 21. November 2003 10:38 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: AW: [JBoss-dev] WebServer: howto obtain

AW: [JBoss-dev] WebServer: howto obtain the host and port generic ally

2003-11-21 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Hi, -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Thomas Diesler (E-mail) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 21. November 2003 10:13 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [JBoss-dev] WebServer: howto obtain the host and port generically Hi all, during webservice deployment the WSDL

Sharing classes between WebContainer and JSR109Deployer *was* AW: [JBoss-dev] Re: deployment classloader in AbstractWebContaine r

2003-11-21 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. November 2003 15:34 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [JBoss-dev] Re: deployment classloader in AbstractWebContainer The deployment localCl is only for

AW: [JBoss-dev] Re: deployment classloader in AbstractWebContaine r

2003-11-20 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. November 2003 15:34 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [JBoss-dev] Re: deployment classloader in AbstractWebContainer The deployment localCl is only for finding

AW: [JBoss-dev] JNDI binding for J2EE1.4 compliant webservices

2003-11-20 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. November 2003 16:07 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: [JBoss-dev] JNDI binding for J2EE1.4 compliant webservices I agree with that, so what is the confusion? From my reading, I

[JBoss-dev] AW: JBoss.NET: web service components as web module

2003-11-18 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Hi Thomas, I´m just about to commit a pragmatic solution to that issue (need only to get the testcase running ;-). Since we have the JSR109 sub-deployment solution, we have access to the parent deployment info including the local installation dir of the war. JSR109Service (or better the

AW: AW: [JBoss-dev] 3.2.3RC1

2003-11-18 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Ok, you owe me a beer ;-) CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Bernd Koecke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Montag, 17. November 2003 17:23 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: AW: [JBoss-dev] 3.2.3RC1 Thanks a lot to Christoph Jung! I checked the redeploy problem of Axis

AW: [JBoss-dev] JNDI lookup problem with webservice client

2003-11-12 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Thomas, Another possibility of binding webservices into JNDI is using references and an associated ServiceFactory (see the behaviour of external web service references in jboss.net). With that approach, you have more control about the serialisation process, classloading issues and engine

[JBoss-dev] [Q: Testsuite] Howto temporarily reconfigure the other security domain

2003-11-11 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Hi (Scott)! On my way for integrating the yet isolated jboss.net testsuite into the global testsuite, I ran into a particular question: Some (server-side) security features of jboss.net/uddi can only be tested when being provided with some reasonable demo authentication data in the associated

AW: [JBoss-dev] 3.2.3RC1

2003-11-06 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
There were two fixes related to axis classloading and discovery that need to be backported. What is your timeframe? I could submit the stuff on Friday. CU, CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 5. November 2003 16:24 An:

AW: [JBoss-dev] 3.2.3RC1

2003-11-06 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Bernd Koecke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. November 2003 09:43 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: [JBoss-dev] 3.2.3RC1 Hi, Christoph Jung made a bugfix for the redeploy bug of webservices. But he made it for JBoss 4. Will

AW: [JBoss-dev] JBoss Group forks again.

2003-10-28 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Such a sweety. Congrats and AMSAP (as many sleep as possible ;-). CU, CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Bill Burke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Sonntag, 26. Oktober 2003 18:46 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [JBoss-dev] JBoss Group

AW: AW: [JBoss-dev] 3.2.2 Issues to resolve

2003-10-17 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
says at deployment that ws is not bound. Please send me a mail, when I missed something. Thanks a lot, Bernd Jung , Dr. Christoph wrote: Bernd, Could you please resend the symptoms(wsr content, dd, detailed steps you undertake, stacktrace ...) such that I can check

AW: [JBoss-dev] 3.2.2 Issues to resolve

2003-10-15 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Bernd, Could you please resend the symptoms(wsr content, dd, detailed steps you undertake, stacktrace ...) such that I can check whether it is a bug or a config error? CU, CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Bernd Koecke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Oktober

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss.NET] revised schedule, seeking for volunteers *was* RE: [JBoss-dev] 4.0 rollback 1st phase complete

2003-08-29 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Ivelin ( others), Wrt the rollback and how this will affect JB.net, Anil, Bill and me came to the conclusion that the 3.2 code [that already builds upon Axis1.1Final] would be a sufficient base for the next 4 weeks [in which I am on baby holiday and most likely neither online nor sitting on a

AW: [JBoss-dev] JBoss.net::WSDL to UDDI Converter added to JBoss

2003-07-24 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Anil, This is great work. It will enable us to finally attach the deployment process automatically to uddi registration! Cool, CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Anil Saldhana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 24. Juli 2003 06:17 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff:

[JBoss-dev] [Ann] [JBoss.net] Axis 1.1 final in *head*

2003-06-29 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
subject says it all. In addition, jws file support (web service code that is compiled on the fly, similar to jsps) has been enabled in the default conf. CGJ ### This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange. For more

AW: [JBoss-dev] jboss-head/testsuite/build has 100 errors for me

2003-06-17 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Have you checked that all relevant thirdparty modules have been obtained through cvs? BTW: I got no jdo.jar on my workspace either ... Must be some recent addition, I guess. sun-jdo? CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Anil Saldhana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 17.

[JBoss-dev] AW: How to run testcases in jboss.net UDDI Related

2003-06-06 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Hi Anil, Sorry for not answering earlier. Needed to do some in-house priority 1 support. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Anil Saldhana [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Montag, 2. Juni 2003 06:49 An: christoph Betreff: UDDI Related Dr.CGJ, here are some new factoids after

AW: [JBoss-dev] JB4DR1 Deadline MAY 26

2003-04-03 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Until 26th of May, I will have a version of W2EE deployment ready (at least the subset of the webservices.xml and jaxrpc-mapping.xml that can be easily mapped via a XSL-driven WebServiceDeployer to the existing web-service.xml/AxisService; deployer hooks in

AW: [JBoss-dev] JDT compiler was: php5 is coming

2003-04-01 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Phil, others, There is even a more official batch interface to the eclipse compiler in the org.eclipse.jdt.core plugin which is much like the original Java compiler: package org.eclipse.jdt.internal.compiler.batch; public class Main implements ProblemSeverities { public

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss.net] Bugfixes and updates in 3.2 and HEAD

2003-03-28 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Title: Nachricht Hi, before 3.2 final will be built, thefollowing bugs have been addressed in Branch_3_2 and HEAD: Bug#638994 - JBossAuthenticationHandler can now handle null-passwords if the associated SecurityDomain does. Bug#594137 - A special HttpActionHandler has been installed in

AW: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net xdoclet subtask

2003-03-24 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Are you a mail-list-bot or what? If that is the case, you seem to be able to do useful programming in your sparetime ;-) But your parsing subsystem seems not to cope with non-native English emails ... As written in a separate response to your first of the three equivalent emails a week ago

AW: AW: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net xdoclet subtask

2003-03-24 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
have no idea what it was doing in the meantime. So, I did see your response - to the second message that arrived first :-) Steve Coy On Monday, March 24, 2003, at 07:45 PM, Jung , Dr. Christoph wrote: Are you a mail-list-bot or what? If that is the case, you seem to be able to do useful

AW: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net xdoclet subtask

2003-03-21 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
I will cater for backporting the jboss.net 1.2 module into the 3.2 branch. It is used (in CVS) in the jboss.net testsuite which is still decoupled from the main testsuite as long as J2EE1.4 is not mandatory. CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

[JBoss-dev] Jboss.net Xdoclet1.2 module now in 3.2 branch *was* AW: [JBoss-dev] Branch_3_2 has been updated to xdoclet 1.2

2003-03-21 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Hi, Stephens noteworthy effort finally triggered me to backport the current jboss.net xdoclet facilities from HEAD to the 3.2 branch (and to fix the bloody view-type=both problem). Best, CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Stephen Coy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Freitag, 21.

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss.net] allowedMethods=* EJBProvider WSDL-Bug resolved in 3.2 and Head *was* AW: [JBoss-user] Remote Beans as Web Services

2003-03-18 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Title: Nachricht Hi, thanks to Mark and Kevin, we could now trace that the WSDL-Emitter driver code in the Axis1.1 EJBProvider is flawed. It has the "stopClasses" meta-attribute not set such thatthe wsdl generator also tries to build wsdl descriptions formethods declared in EJB interfaces

[JBoss-dev] FYI [JBoss.net]: Integrated Uddi Server submitted into HEAD

2003-03-13 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Hi, I just submitted another step towards J2EE1.4 Web Service compliance. The jboss-net.sar now additionally hosts a uddi-v2 compliant server (currently jUddi0.6.2). It is published upon startup as a web service itself (currently running under http://hostname/axis/services/uddi) via the

AW: [JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

2003-03-13 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Chris, The original build problem was indeed caused by my submission in two stages (the libraries.ent was in the latter stage). Could you please check that you have the thirdparty/juddi-juddi module on the build machine? Thx, CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

AW: [JBoss-dev] FYI [JBoss.net]: Integrated Uddi Server submitted into HEAD

2003-03-13 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jung , Dr. Christoph Sent: 13 March 2003 13:23 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [JBoss-dev] FYI [JBoss.net]: Integrated Uddi Server submitted into HEAD Hi, I just submitted another step towards J2EE1.4 Web Service compliance. The jboss-net.sar now

AW: [JBoss-dev] Jboss.net undeployment

2003-02-06 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
John, Which version of jboss/Jboss.net do you use? What error do you get? Jboss.net automatically builds an in-memory undeployment descriptor for Axis from the web-service.xml (it is simply changing the root element name) in order to tear down the web service on undeployment, so this should

AW: [JBoss-dev] Jboss.net undeployment -- false alarm

2003-02-06 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: John Fawcett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 6. Februar 2003 18:22 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: RE: [JBoss-dev] Jboss.net undeployment -- false alarm Sorry, we had some unrelated transient config errors that I mistakenly attributed to

AW: [JBoss-dev] JBoss-IDE next steps

2003-02-04 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Hans, First congratulations for getting started such a badly needed feature around JBoss. I just saw the package Xdoclet-View in your plan and this reminded me of some unfinished prototype that I did last year. It was an experiment of how to write some extensible view for editing meta-data

AW: [JBoss-dev] Axis/Jboss bug parsing soap calls using Oracle XDK9?

2003-01-17 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
The axis version in the 3.0 branch is a beta. From 3.2 on, we have axis release 1 (it is no more located in the system lib directory, but an integral part of the jboss.net sar) In head, we have axis 1.1beta integrated. Since you seem not to use jboss.net, why don´t you simply update the jar in

AW: [JBoss-dev] Axis/Jboss bug parsing soap calls using Oracle XDK9?

2003-01-17 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
at 3.2RC1 and see if it fixes the problem... Kev -Original Message- From: Jung , Dr. Christoph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2003 10:34 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: AW: [JBoss-dev] Axis/Jboss bug parsing soap calls using Oracle XDK9? The axis version in the 3.0 branch

AW: [JBoss-dev] Axis/Jboss bug parsing soap calls using Oracle XDK9?

2003-01-17 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
the AXIS service URL doesn't work if I upgrade the version of AXIS in Jboss 3.0. Kev -Original Message- From: Jung , Dr. Christoph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 17 January 2003 14:03 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: AW: [JBoss-dev] Axis/Jboss bug parsing soap calls using Oracle XDK9

AW: AW: [JBoss-dev] Updating to use Axis 1.1 beta

2003-01-08 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
They have also changed the signature of the serializer´s xsd-emitter methods. It´s in now. CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jung , Dr. Christoph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. Januar 2003 08:26 An: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Betreff: AW: AW: [JBoss-dev] Updating to use

AW: [JBoss-dev] patch for axis1.1beta upgrade

2003-01-08 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
John, Thanks. Just applied them (semantically). CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: John Fawcett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. Januar 2003 02:22 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [JBoss-dev] patch for axis1.1beta upgrade Hi, Below is a patch to upgrade the jboss

AW: [JBoss-dev] Updating to use Axis 1.1 beta

2003-01-07 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
projects (other than the e-mail sent out previously), so if you are using any of these, please verify it does not break any of your code. Thanks. -Tom -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jung , Dr. Christoph Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003

AW: AW: [JBoss-dev] Updating to use Axis 1.1 beta

2003-01-07 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
certainly should have done a clean build before the update and apologize. I also am sorry that I misunderstood I would also give my ok for putting the 1.1 binaries into head as meaning that it would be ok for me to update the binaries into head. -Tom. Jung , Dr. Christoph wrote: You should have tried

AW: [JBoss-dev] Updating to use Axis 1.1 beta

2003-01-02 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Tom, There is already a patch for jboss.net submitted which addresses some additional exceptions raised in the Axis1.1 beta. I think that I will be able to apply it such that jboss.net will cope with both 1.0 and 1.1 ... I would also give my ok for putting the 1.1 binaries into head, but I would

AW: [JBoss-dev] jbossnet ant task

2002-12-12 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Not yet. I tweaked it ~3 weeks ago to somehow run through, but there may have been changes such that I should change it. CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: John Fawcett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. Dezember 2002 22:21 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: RE: [JBoss-dev]

[JBoss-dev] [Ann] [JBoss.Net] Axis Release 1 + SOAP over SMTP support in *Head*

2002-11-09 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Title: Nachricht Fellow Web-Service-Geeks, as always beforetaking 3 weeks off, I tried to break thebuild ;-) no, just kidding. I just managed to integrate into head (finally!) the 1.0 release of Axisincluding some jboss.net extensions wrt e-mail transport of soap messages as

AW: [JBoss-dev] JBoss.net and performance tuning

2002-11-08 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Matt, Currently we just do prototyping with the stuff, no profiling at all. I´m away three weeks for holiday. Let us Discuss this when I come back, ok? It´s crucial and your measures should help a lot in that respect. CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Matt Munz

AW: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net status

2002-11-08 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Title: Nachricht 3.0 is still a beta version 3.2 should be rc1 head will be release 1 when I manage to checkin the stuff over the weekend. I´m going on holidays for the next three weeks, so no promise on that. But I´ll try. CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-Von: Finn, Michael

[JBoss-dev] [Ann] [JBoss.Net] Axis RC2 + Extended Jboss-Net-Xdoclet-Module now in head

2002-10-02 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Title: Nachricht Hi, Axis RC2has just been successfully integrated into Jboss.Net@cvs-head.The testsuite has been added a chapter for the different ways of dealingwith stateful services through the web-service scope (thanks Kevin Connor for the inspiration).Thatpart of the testsuite now

AW: [JBoss-dev] writing a jboss.net (jmx.net?) client

2002-09-25 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
in this case? Do you find the generated code reasonable, easy to maintain, scalable, reliable, etc.? - Matt -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jung , Dr. Christoph Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2002 10:06 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: AW: [JBoss

AW: [JBoss-dev] writing a jboss.net (jmx.net?) client

2002-09-24 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Matt, For getting the client-side invocations and stub classes right, we recommend The following steps: A) generate wsdl from the deployed web services. B) generate stub classes from the wsdl using wsdl2java. Using Axis/MbeanInvocationHandler lacks a lot of deployment information

AW: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net and catalina

2002-09-18 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Bruce, which jboss version do you refer to. It works for me from 3.2Beta on even in an exploded fashion. CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Bruce Scharlau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. September 2002 11:31 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net and

AW: AW: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net and catalina

2002-09-18 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
If I´m not totally out of mind, yes. CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Bruce Scharlau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 18. September 2002 12:17 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: AW: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net and catalina At 11:58 18/09/2002 +0200, you wrote: Bruce, which

AW: [JBoss-dev] JBoss.net now supports Axis RC1

2002-09-12 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Thanks scott, That saves me a lot of headaches ;-) CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 12. September 2002 11:36 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss.net now supports Axis RC1 I saw the NPE while testing

[JBoss-dev] AW: jboss 4 build system changes, possible jboss.net and catalinaimpact.

2002-09-11 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
David, Thanks for the notice. Unfortunately, I have no exact idea about the differences of the jboss-xdoclet and the version that Frederick was getting by the xdoclet guys (must have been something between 1.1 and 1.2 with some bugs fixed?). Frederick, could you please synchronize with David

AW: AW: [JBoss-dev] JBoss.net now supports Axis RC1 - update

2002-09-11 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Bruce, Thanks for the hint. IMHO, the whole stuff should deploy packed as well as unpacked. I will have a look at the Catalina/unpacked variant when I have some spare time this afternoon. CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Bruce Scharlau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Dienstag,

[JBoss-dev] WG: thirdParty mess at head? *Was* AW: JBoss.net compilation fails on HEAD

2002-09-11 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jung , Dr. Christoph Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. September 2002 09:49 An: 'Juha-P Lindfors' Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Betreff: thirdParty mess at head? *Was* AW: JBoss.net compilation fails on HEAD Juha, others I cannot get head to compile at various points

AW: [JBoss-dev] JBoss.net now supports Axis RC1

2002-09-10 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Bruce, That is strange. Could you please try to debug the exact Null variable that causes the Exception. In EmbeddedCatalinaServiceSX, it says: private void createWebContext(final WebApplication appInfo, URL warUrl, final WebDescriptorParser webAppParser) throws Exception {

AW: [JBoss-dev] Another CVS tagging question

2002-09-09 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Frederick, I´m not sure, but I guess you need to integrate your changes manually against Branch_3_2 ? I hope we didn´t collide wrt. to the AxisRC1 migration I checked into head on Friday? I´d like to backport the changes to 3_2 this week. Btw: The web application part of jboss.net is now

AW: [JBoss-dev] JBoss.net now supports Axis RC1

2002-09-09 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Is the problem with empty soapaction fixed (see buglist under jboss.net-category). On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 06:49:35PM +0200, Jung , Dr. Christoph wrote: One of the most requested features is now in head (along with some bugfixes and some nice deployment structure changes that remove the dependency

[JBoss-dev] JBoss.net now supports Axis RC1

2002-09-06 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Title: Nachricht One of the most requested features is now in "head" (along with some bugfixes and some nice deployment structure changes that remove the dependency of AxisService to the WebContainer). Axis will go 1.0 in a week or so which should be trivial to incorporate then. Are there

AW: AW: [JBoss-dev] Just how hard is polymorphic cmp?

2002-08-28 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
ould not be too hard to extend an existing non-polymorphic engine without performance drawbacksfor the standard mappings (without having completely looked through the cmp code in detail). Jung , Dr. Christoph wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] type="cite">David, Dain, othersCurrently, we u

[JBoss-dev] Java is not dead! *was* AW: [jboss-group] Bug 4670071 Updated: java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(String) is too restrictive

2002-06-21 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Juha, This is extremely good news as SUN seems to have accepted two bug-requests at the same time. Let´s see how they resolve it ... CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Juha-P Lindfors [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Freitag, 21. Juni 2002 13:50 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff:

AW: [JBoss-dev] AxisService behavior is questionable

2002-05-31 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Hi Scott, The reason was that I wanted the security context under which the transport servlet is deployed (and I suspect there will be further such issue in the future) to be a configurable parameter of the AxisService. Hence, I must generate the jboss-web.xml at runtime. I could easily

AW: [JBoss-dev] AxisService behavior is questionable

2002-05-31 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
- Original Message - From: Jung , Dr. Christoph [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 1:00 AM Subject: AW: [JBoss-dev] AxisService behavior is questionable Hi Scott, The reason was that I wanted the security context under which

[JBoss-dev] Sun has just reacted to our RFE-4670071 ...

2002-05-29 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Title: Nachricht ... ok, they sort of reacted ... Evaluation x@x 2002-05-28 We will revisit this decision (from bug 4406709). 563 votes is not enough! Let them state Evaluation x@x 2002-05-28 We will revisit this decision (from bug

AW: [JBoss-dev] Anyone doing https in JBoss using jsse ?

2002-05-13 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Great, Thanks scott. F*ck Class.forName()! CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. Mai 2002 08:49 An: 'Jboss-Development' Betreff: Re: [JBoss-dev] Anyone doing https in JBoss using jsse ? This is done in now in the 3.0 and

AW: [JBoss-dev] getContextClassLoader() vs. Class.forName(x,y,z)

2002-05-03 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
That is true, arrays are not constructed by loadClass() calls. Class.forName() does it, but has this ugly and uneblievably stupid in-VM cache. Maybe a solution would be to have a surrogate method that does array construction but does not rely on Class.forName, like this not at all tested,

AW: [JBoss-dev] Anyone doing https in JBoss using jsse ?

2002-05-03 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
packagePrefix+.protocol+.+Handler It´s still early and the lingual part of brain is still sleeping. Does this make sense? CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Peter Braswell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Freitag, 3. Mai 2002 02:43 An: Jung , Dr. Christoph; 'David Jencks' Cc: 'Jboss-Development

[JBoss-dev] Anyone doing https in JBoss using jsse ?

2002-05-02 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Title: Nachricht Hi there, in the jboss.net module, wecurrently play around with establishing secure https access to remote UDDI registries. Unfortunately, we seem to have problems installing the https handlers inside the jsse.jar in the default URL.getStreamHandler(String protocol)

AW: [JBoss-dev] Anyone doing https in JBoss using jsse ?

2002-05-02 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
- Von: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Mai 2002 18:03 An: Dan Christopherson Cc: Jung , Dr. Christoph; 'Jboss-Development' Betreff: Re: [JBoss-dev] Anyone doing https in JBoss using jsse ? How about the existing org.jboss.net.protocol.URLStreamHandlerFactory david

AW: [JBoss-dev] [JL] Is it time for a new enterprise solution?

2002-04-26 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
He, he. Volunteers? In the meantime, I heard from my colleagues who had actually done some MMC programming that it would be a real nightmare indeed :-( So much for expectations. Wonder if VS.net makes it more handy ... CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL

[JBoss-dev] 528 votes and 4th place in the TOP25!

2002-04-26 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Title: Nachricht This is theregular, non-automizedbug-voting reminder for those of you who haven´t pulled up their asses yet to visit JDC at: http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4670071.html (all others, great effort, we will make it number #1). FYI: ThisRFE tries to

AW: [JBoss-dev] Workaround for JUNG's RFE and load deadlock

2002-04-25 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Strike! CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Alarik Myrin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. April 2002 06:24 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: RE: [JBoss-dev] Workaround for JUNG's RFE and load deadlock WAIT! EVERYTHING WORKS FINE! Don't i feel like a dumb ass.

AW: [JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] Save the Rabbit Hole UnifiedClassLoaders - Vote and Argue at the BugParade! - Spread the Word!

2002-04-24 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Yes, that´s what the deadlock (hopefully) was about ... two threads loading classes simultaneously ... I think that Marc now has a promising (and ingenious, I didn´t think about the synchronized - synchronized() relation the whole time!) workaround. CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von:

AW: [JBoss-dev] Workaround for JUNG's RFE and load deadlock

2002-04-24 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
I hope this patch will also meet your scenario of having 2 threads coming through a single UnifiedClassLoader ... http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=548098group_id=228 66atid=376687 Weird, CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Dave Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

AW: [JBoss-dev] Are these CVS modules still in use anywhere?

2002-04-23 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
I would appreciate deletion of ZOAP as an evidence of my once evil programming skills ;-) CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Jason Dillon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Dienstag, 23. April 2002 04:31 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [JBoss-dev] Are these CVS modules still in use

[JBoss-dev] AW: Workaround for CL stuff

2002-04-23 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
As a quick work-around while I´m busy today with doing business (buaaeeeh:-( Patch the java.lang.ClassLoader class ... Either remove the synchronized keyword from loadClassInternal (should be safe) or make it protected and remove the synchronized keyword in an overriding method of

AW: [JBoss-dev] AW: Workaround for CL stuff

2002-04-23 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Apr 2002, Jung , Dr. Christoph wrote: As a quick work-around while I´m busy today with doing business (buaaeeeh:-( Patch the java.lang.ClassLoader class ... Either remove the synchronized keyword from loadClassInternal (should be safe) or make it protected and remove the synchronized

AW: [JBoss-dev] Workaround for CL stuff

2002-04-23 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Actually, it´s more complicated: Thread 1: VM detects that it needs bar, calls UCL A.loadClassInternal() and hence synchronizes on A Thread 2: VM detects that it needs foo, calls UCL B.loadClassInternal() and hence synchronizes on B Thread 1: UCL A delegates to

AW: [JBoss-dev] Workaround for CL stuff

2002-04-23 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
AFAIK, a thread will only release the lock in the closest synchronization scope. If you can make sure that the UCL itself is the last lock before entering ULR, then it should IMHO work. Since we are not in control of loadClassInternal, but of loadClass, there is the chance that this will do as

[JBoss-dev] 414 Votes for the RFE 4670071 ... We are in the Top25! ... Go ahead ...

2002-04-23 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Title: Nachricht Ilet it be recatecorizedunder RFE. Now we are in the Top25! The shown ranking is slightly behind the actual votes (414!). We should be 6th place now. http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/top25rfes.html You are a great bunch of Java connaisseurs ;-) Go ahead,

[JBoss-dev] We got now 183 votes for Bug/Eou 4670071 ... But you can surely do better!

2002-04-22 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Title: Nachricht Thanks for the massive support of this IMPORTANT, IMPORTANT issue...IfSun(TM) would count the Eou section in their TOP-Bug list, we would be IMHO already in the upper half. But let´s be sure about this! Don´t let them assign some freshman on this bug! Make it a prime

AW: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net tests

2002-04-22 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Hmm, well ... Problem is that we introduce a lot of additional dependencies (Axis, wsdl4j, commons-logging, tt-bytecode, etc.) on the testsuite then. Problem is that we would have to make jboss.net a standard-module, but honestly we are behind the main release cycle: If everything goes ok, we

AW: [JBoss-dev] Re: [JBoss-user] Save the Rabbit Hole UnifiedClassLoaders - Vote and Argue at the BugParade! - Spread the Word!

2002-04-22 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
I just asked the responsible guy at SUN why it doesn´t show up on any of the TOP lists ... In case that EOU´s are not RFE´s, I asked him to change the status such that we will show up. Let´s see. Continue voting! Hi,Hi CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Randall Parker [mailto:[EMAIL

[JBoss-user] AW: [JBoss-dev] Save the Rabbit Hole UnifiedClassLoaders - Vote a nd Argue at the BugParade! - Spread the Word!

2002-04-21 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
does it happen?), or something that isn't implemented because of this. ( 1 voted 3 votes on this, I think :-) Marius On fre, 2002-04-19 at 12:41, Jung , Dr. Christoph wrote: Hi guys, as promised, I have refiled our spurious deadlock problem that comes from private synchronized Class

Jar in sar policy; client deployment *was* AW: [JBoss-dev] Reason for castor?

2002-04-19 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
I would highly appreciate that, we could have the upcoming jboss-net release in there two. While we are at it, I now put the axis.jar/wsdl4j.jar/tt-bytecode.jar/axis-config.xml into the jboss-net.sar not to potentially pollute the distro. However these libraries would also be needed by any

[JBoss-dev] Save the Rabbit Hole UnifiedClassLoaders - Vote and Argue at theBugParade! - Spread the Word!

2002-04-19 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Title: Nachricht Hi guys, as promised, I have refiledour spurious deadlock problemthat comes fromprivate synchronized Class java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClassInternal(String) in the Bug Parade under http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4670071.html If you feel you can

AW: [JBoss-dev] Save the Rabbit Hole UnifiedClassLoaders - Vote and Argue at the BugParade! - Spread the Word!

2002-04-19 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
does it happen?), or something that isn't implemented because of this. ( 1 voted 3 votes on this, I think :-) Marius On fre, 2002-04-19 at 12:41, Jung , Dr. Christoph wrote: Hi guys, as promised, I have refiled our spurious deadlock problem that comes from private synchronized Class

AW: [JBoss-dev] Old servlet.jar vs. jboss.net/jetty dependency?

2002-04-18 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Me too ;-) No objections against depending on jetty ;-) CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Scott M Stark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. April 2002 06:15 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: [JBoss-dev] Old servlet.jar vs. jboss.net/jetty dependency? Yes. We

AW: [JBoss-dev] JBoss.net idea for Macromedia Flash support

2002-04-17 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Frederik, Great vision, good analysis, nice solution. Think of animated puppet cartoons in Flash steered by a remote Jboss-story-server via SOAP ;-) I guess you proposed having a dedicated AxisService/PatchedAxisServlet for Flash (i.e. a customized jboss-net-service.xml that could be installed

AW: AW: [JBoss-dev] Thread deadlock in class loader

2002-04-11 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Did you prepend the bootclasspath with the patched class using the Xbootclasspath/p:patch.jar option? CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Dave Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. April 2002 23:22 An: Jung , Dr. Christoph Betreff: Re: AW: [JBoss-dev] Thread deadlock

AW: AW: AW: [JBoss-dev] Thread deadlock in class loader

2002-04-11 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
I will reissue the bug report immediately. The Jboss will hopefully back it up. Let´s see how this develops ;-) CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Dave Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. April 2002 16:37 An: Jung , Dr. Christoph Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [JBoss-dev

AW: [JBoss-user] RE: Bomb the bug parade! was AW: [JBoss-dev] Thread deadlock in class loader

2002-04-11 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
I just filed an EOU-request with reference to the Bug-Id and a priority of can´t do without it. Maybe that was a fault, because I just got a review id and it is not yet visible officially? Anyone knows how this works? Will they publish the thing not until it reviewed, or what? CGJ

AW: [JBoss-user] RE: Bomb the bug parade! was AW: [JBoss-dev] Thr ead deadlock in class loader

2002-04-11 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Ok, so please guys, save your powder a bit for the upcoming real bug id which I will send as soon as I have it ... CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Juha-P Lindfors [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. April 2002 18:04 An: Jung , Dr. Christoph Cc: 'marc fleury'; Eric

AW: [JBoss-dev] RE: AW: Patches to jboss.net

2002-04-10 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Addendum: 4.5 you have to first utter a jboss-all/testsuite/build because there are some basic testcase classes which do the server deployment for us. Maybe these were the unresolved symbols you were seeing. I added that hint to the jboss.net/docs/Readme ... Martin and Marius, any help in

AW: [JBoss-dev] RE: AW: Patches to jboss.net

2002-04-10 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
This means that the testsuite does not find the jboss.net classes, could you please check That the class-path at the javac/ task points to jboss-all/jboss.net/output/lib/jboss-net.sar and that that file Exists. CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Marius [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]

  1   2   >