AW: [JBoss-dev] JBoss Group forks again.

2003-10-28 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
Such a sweety. Congrats and AMSAP (as many sleep as possible ;-). CU, CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Bill Burke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Sonntag, 26. Oktober 2003 18:46 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [JBoss-dev] JBoss Group

[JBoss-dev] Problems with 3.2.2 and remote JMS (RC4 works fine)

2003-10-28 Thread Dietmar Posselt
Hi folks, We have some problems with remote access to JMS in 3.2.2final on linux. If I try to access a queue on a remote host running 3.2.2final, the access fails with the following exception: org.jboss.mq.SpyJMSException: Cannot authenticate user; - nested throwable:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-828912 ] BigDecimal CMP scaled to 0

2003-10-28 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #828912, was opened at 2003-10-23 16:12 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sevenm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=828912group_id=22866 Category: JAWS (inactive) Group: v3.2 Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-831662 ] joxasPrep error in Oracle trace file

2003-10-28 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #831662, was opened at 2003-10-28 11:10 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=831662group_id=22866 Category: JBossTX Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-831662 ] joxasPrep error in Oracle trace file

2003-10-28 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #831662, was opened at 2003-10-28 10:10 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=831662group_id=22866 Category: JBossTX Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-831662 ] joxasPrep error in Oracle trace file

2003-10-28 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #831662, was opened at 2003-10-28 11:10 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by marcuseriksson You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=831662group_id=22866 Category: JBossTX Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-831662 ] joxasPrep error in Oracle trace file

2003-10-28 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #831662, was opened at 2003-10-28 10:10 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=831662group_id=22866 Category: JBossTX Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5

Re: [JBoss-dev] JBoss Group forks again.

2003-10-28 Thread danch
Congratulations, Bill! -danch Bill Burke wrote: October 26th. 12:36 AM. Proud dad and mom doing fine. http://www.jboss.org/bill/burke/baby.jpg Bill --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net

RE: [JBoss-dev] commit of jmx package done

2003-10-28 Thread marc fleury
Well done tom :) marcf -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom Elrod Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 10:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [JBoss-dev] commit of jmx package done (I sent this last night be never showed up in my

RE: [JBoss-dev] We need a 3.0.9 maintenance release

2003-10-28 Thread marc fleury
Won't introducing the same code require an incompatible change to the current datasource jboss-service.xml schema? Given the hideous nature of 3.0 format I can't say this is a bad thing. I am glad the clowns responsible for this configuration mess self-flushed themselves to apache

[JBoss-dev] And another JBoss fork

2003-10-28 Thread Rupp, Heiko
Hi, I am pleased to announce that another JBoss fork has happened. For details see: http://www.pilhuhn.de/orlando/ As you can see from the first picture, the young man will work on deamonish functions. Heiko

Re: [JBoss-dev] And another JBoss fork

2003-10-28 Thread julien viet
Title: Re: [JBoss-dev] And another JBoss fork Congratulations Heiko Hi, I am pleased to announce that another JBoss fork has happened. For details see: http://www.pilhuhn.de/orlando/ As you can see from the first picture, the young man will work on deamonish functions. Heiko

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (Branch_3_2/winxp/1.4.2_01) Compilation failed

2003-10-28 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

RE: [JBoss-dev] And another JBoss fork

2003-10-28 Thread marc fleury
oh my god, here goes the business. They are barely out of the womb and already they want to rule the world! Take our business away and ruin us too many forks, they are happening like rabbits. My twins will kick the butt of your deamons :) well done to everyone, babies are always good

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.1_05) Test Results: 94 % ( 1344 / 1417 ) - come on - pull your finger out

2003-10-28 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] Re; Letter

2003-10-28 Thread Mrs Jumai YOUSSEF
Dear Friend, Warmest greetings in the name of ALLAH,the most gracious. I pray that he may grant you the wisdom to understand the pathetic story i am about to tell and the courage to offer the much needed support i solicite for in this letter. I am a mother of two and the wife of late General

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.2_01) Test Results: 94 % ( 1316 / 1389 ) - come on - pull your finger out

2003-10-28 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.1_05) Test Results: 64 % ( 651 / 1009 ) - could do better

2003-10-28 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] build\build.xml and remoting

2003-10-28 Thread Tom Elrod
I started to remove remoting from the core modules needed for jboss (in the build\build.xml file) and see that remoting module is part of the 'core' group. Also looks as though the remoting jar should be copied into the root lib directory (build\output\jboss-4.0.0DR3\lib). However, when I do a

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.2_01) Test Results: 95 % ( 1347 / 1417 ) - nearly there - who is gonna get us to 100%!

2003-10-28 Thread chris
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===